Skip to content
worldfires
TH · Thailand · →

Li fire, 24 January 2020 ลี้ · Li

Out · last detection 29 Jan 2020, 19:00 UTC

The fire started on 24 January 2020 in Li, Thailand, and satellites saw it burning for 6 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,411 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 225th largest in Chiang Mai Province since 2016 (of 399 with a page). Number 263 in Thailand in 2020, of 457.

Compare with…
Burnt area
1,411ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
6days
24 Jan 2020 – 29 Jan 2020
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
24 Jan
2020
Heat detections
36
in a single hotspot: 37 MW
Danger at start
21
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
34MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 24 Jan29 Jan
29 Jan 2020

How it evolved, day by day

24 Jan 2020 · 12 MW · 7 25 Jan 2020 · 5 MW · 3 26 Jan 2020 · 25 MW · 7 27 Jan 2020 · 131 MW · 8 28 Jan 2020 · 26 MW · 7 29 Jan 2020 · 6 MW · 3
24 Jan 25 Jan 26 Jan 27 Jan 28 Jan 29 Jan

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

33°high
38km/h · peak gust
17%lowest humidity

It had gone 20 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

84% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 238 ha in 2016, 717 ha in 2017, 786 ha in 2018, 458 ha in 2019. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 1,191 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.9% of the area of London (14 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Li ลี้ where it started
    1,417 ha
    0.8 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
19 Jan 31.2 °C 41 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
20 Jan 30.6 °C 45 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
21 Jan 32.0 °C 39 % 19 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
22 Jan 33.1 °C 35 % 14 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
23 Jan 32.9 °C 30 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
24 Jan 31.9 °C 25 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
25 Jan 30.8 °C 22 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
26 Jan 29.3 °C 17 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
27 Jan 28.7 °C 27 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
28 Jan 29.1 °C 23 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
29 Jan 30.2 °C 29 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
30 Jan after 28.8 °C 42 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
31 Jan after 30.7 °C 34 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
1 Feb after 30.8 °C 33 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
2 Feb after 31.6 °C 30 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
3 Feb after 32.0 °C 28 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
4 Feb after 31.8 °C 27 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
5 Feb after 31.8 °C 28 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
6 Feb after 31.7 °C 28 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
7 Feb after 32.9 °C 28 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
8 Feb after 31.8 °C 34 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 29

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 17 Jan 2020
After · 5 Feb 2020

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 36Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Thailand ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Li fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 24 January 2020 and 29 January 2020: 6 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,411 hectares (14.1 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Li (1,417 ha, 0.8 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 33.1 °C, humidity dropped to 17 % and gusts hit 38 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 31, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Thailand (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 199 · 191 · Emergency number and official warnings ›

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

No changes since 24 October 2026.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 199 · 191.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 36 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.