Skip to content
worldfires
BR · Brazil · –

Lagoa do Piauí fire, September 2025 Lagoa do Piauí, Monsenhor Gil

Out · last detection 18 Sept 2025, 16:28 UTC

The fire started on 1 September 2025 in Lagoa do Piauí, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 18 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,552 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 508th largest in Piaui since 2016 (of 665 with a page). Number 421 in Brazil in 2025, of 526.

Burnt area
3,552ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
18days
1 Sept 2025 – 18 Sept 2025
Municipalities hit
2
municipalities
Started on
1 Sept
2025
Heat detections
95
in a single hotspot: 44 MW
Danger at start
46
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
47MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 1 Sept18 Sept
18 Sept 2025

How it evolved, day by day

1 Sept 2025 · 13 MW · 2 2 Sept 2025 · 144 MW · 12 3 Sept 2025 · 86 MW · 11 4 Sept 2025 · 15 MW · 2 5 Sept 2025 · 6 MW · 3 6 Sept 2025 · 1 MW · 1 7 Sept 2025 · 15 MW · 4 8 Sept 2025 · 41 MW · 7 9 Sept 2025 · 15 MW · 4 10 Sept 2025 · 46 MW · 11 11 Sept 2025 · 183 MW · 15 12 Sept 2025 · 27 MW · 10 13 Sept 2025 · 8 MW · 2 16 Sept 2025 · 18 MW · 4 18 Sept 2025 · 80 MW · 7
1 Sept 4 Sept 7 Sept 11 Sept

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

38°high
48km/h · peak gust
20%lowest humidity

It had gone 18 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

4% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 145 ha in 2017.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2.2% of the area of London (36 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Lagoa do Piauí 4,810 inhabitants where it started
    3,026 ha reached on 1 Sept
    7.0 %
  2. Monsenhor Gil 10,255 inhabitants
    550 ha reached on 3 Sept
    1.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area7.1 ha
Residents≈ 350

Inside the perimeter there were about 7.1 hectares of built-up land and about 350 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
1 Sept 36.4 °C 28 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
2 Sept 36.5 °C 25 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
3 Sept 36.5 °C 21 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
4 Sept 36.2 °C 24 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
5 Sept 36.5 °C 25 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
6 Sept 36.4 °C 27 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
7 Sept 37.4 °C 22 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
8 Sept 37.2 °C 20 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
9 Sept 36.6 °C 26 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
10 Sept 38.3 °C 21 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
11 Sept 37.8 °C 26 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
12 Sept 37.3 °C 24 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
13 Sept 36.1 °C 29 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
14 Sept 36.6 °C 26 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
15 Sept 37.4 °C 25 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
16 Sept 36.4 °C 29 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
17 Sept 37.3 °C 25 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
18 Sept 38.4 °C 22 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
19 Sept after 37.9 °C 24 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
20 Sept after 37.0 °C 24 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
21 Sept after 36.9 °C 28 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
22 Sept after 36.3 °C 32 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
23 Sept after 38.2 °C 26 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
24 Sept after 38.2 °C 24 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
25 Sept after 37.2 °C 25 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
26 Sept after 37.1 °C 26 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
27 Sept after 36.6 °C 25 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
28 Sept after 36.7 °C 25 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 46.4, a minimum humidity of 28% and 18 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 26.

FWI at the start 46.4
Minimum humidity 28 %
Days without rain 18
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Floriano fire, August 2018
3,269 ha 8 days FWI 47.0 Min. humidity 28 % 176 km away, in 2018

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 2.5 mm on 6 Sept.

What happened to them

15 days
median duration
4,549 ha
median area
8 %
went past 10,000 ha
2.8 mm
rain at the end (median; 9 of 26 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (3,552 ha against a median of 4,549 ha) and lasted 18 days, against 15 days.

In 17 of 26, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.8 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
48km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 18 Sept, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 9 of 26, with a median of 2.8 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 25 Aug 2025
After · 25 Sept 2025

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 11 September 2025 the air beside the fire reached 46 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 27: 1.8 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak46 µg/m³
Days over the guideline5 days
PM1046 µg/m³
Optical depth0.38
30 Aug4 Sept9 Sept14 Sept19 Sept
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 95Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Brazil

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Lagoa do Piauí fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 1 September 2025 to 18 September 2025 (18 days). The perimeter dates it from 1 September 2025 to 16 September 2025.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,552 hectares (35.5 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Lagoa do Piauí (3,026 ha, 7.0 %); Monsenhor Gil (550 ha, 1.0 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 38.4 °C, humidity dropped to 20 % and gusts hit 48 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 47, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 26. Their median duration was 15 days and their median area 4,549 ha; 8 % went past 10,000 ha. In 17 of 26, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.8 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 193 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 16 September 2025 → 18 September 2025.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 193.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 1 September 2025 to 16 September 2025. 95 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.