Skip to content
worldfires
IR · Iran · –

Khoramshahr fire, March 2017 Khoramshahr

Out · last detection 21 Mar 2017, 21:54 UTC

The fire started on 2 March 2017 in Khoramshahr, Iran, and satellites saw it burning for 20 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,114 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 15th largest in Khuzestan since 2016 (of 20 with a page). Number 12 in Iran in 2017, of 16.

Burnt area
1,114ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
20days
2 Mar 2017 – 21 Mar 2017
Municipalities hit
1
counties
Started on
2 Mar
2017
Heat detections
166
in a single hotspot: 174 MW
Danger at start
46
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
112MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 2 Mar21 Mar
21 Mar 2017

How it evolved, day by day

2 Mar 2017 · 173 MW · 29 3 Mar 2017 · 227 MW · 13 4 Mar 2017 · 94 MW · 4 5 Mar 2017 · 408 MW · 21 6 Mar 2017 · 212 MW · 18 7 Mar 2017 · 56 MW · 9 8 Mar 2017 · 27 MW · 5 9 Mar 2017 · 354 MW · 9 10 Mar 2017 · 54 MW · 4 13 Mar 2017 · 48 MW · 9 14 Mar 2017 · 87 MW · 9 15 Mar 2017 · 69 MW · 7 16 Mar 2017 · 62 MW · 8 17 Mar 2017 · 42 MW · 8 18 Mar 2017 · 11 MW · 2 19 Mar 2017 · 61 MW · 4 20 Mar 2017 · 18 MW · 5 21 Mar 2017 · 4 MW · 2
2 Mar 5 Mar 10 Mar 16 Mar 20 Mar

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

32°high
79km/h · peak gust
8%lowest humidity

It had gone 6 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 16.2 mm on 24 Mar.

This area had burned before

86% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 955 ha in 2016.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.7% of the area of London (11 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Khoramshahr where it started
    1,120 ha reached on 2 Mar
    0.6 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Strong wind: 12 % of the area in Iran

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
2 Mar 25.6 °C 20 % 58 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
3 Mar 26.4 °C 30 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
4 Mar 27.5 °C 18 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
5 Mar 27.5 °C 18 % 41 km/h 0.1 mm High 34
6 Mar 24.5 °C 24 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
7 Mar 27.3 °C 15 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
8 Mar 28.8 °C 13 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
9 Mar 28.2 °C 10 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
10 Mar 30.0 °C 9 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
11 Mar 24.8 °C 26 % 71 km/h 0.9 mm Very high 45
12 Mar 30.0 °C 31 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
13 Mar 31.7 °C 15 % 72 km/h 0.4 mm Very extreme 71
14 Mar 27.3 °C 17 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
15 Mar 27.9 °C 17 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
16 Mar 28.8 °C 14 % 55 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56
17 Mar 26.9 °C 13 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
18 Mar 30.8 °C 8 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
19 Mar 25.8 °C 29 % 79 km/h 7.5 mm Moderate 20
20 Mar 25.8 °C 34 % 53 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
21 Mar 26.1 °C 19 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
22 Mar after 27.5 °C 21 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
23 Mar after 25.7 °C 33 % 74 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
24 Mar after 22.0 °C 64 % 45 km/h 16.2 mm Very low 1

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 46.3, a minimum humidity of 20% and 6 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 10.

FWI at the start 46.3
Minimum humidity 20 %
Days without rain 6
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Al-Mejar Al-Kabir fire, April 2023
1,003 ha 2 days FWI 47.3 Min. humidity 19 % 116 km away, in 2023

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

Fires in the area that started in similar weather: 10. With fewer than 15 we give no figures: they would be more noise than signal.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

16.2 mmfirst rain
24 Mar3 days after it ended
79km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 21 Mar, and on 24 Mar 16.2 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 23 Feb 2017
After · 28 Mar 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 166Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Iran

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Khoramshahr fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 2 March 2017 and 21 March 2017: 20 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,114 hectares (11.1 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Khoramshahr (1,120 ha, 0.6 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 31.7 °C, humidity dropped to 8 % and gusts hit 79 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 71, class Very extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Iran (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 125 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 125.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 166 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.