Skip to content
worldfires
IR · Iran · –

Khoramshahr fire, September 2016 Khoramshahr

Out · last detection 9 Sept 2016, 22:14 UTC

The fire started on 1 September 2016 in Khoramshahr, Iran, and satellites saw it burning for 9 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,261 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 10th largest in Khuzestan since 2016 (of 20 with a page). Number 8 in Iran in 2016, of 15.

Burnt area
1,261ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
9days
1 Sept 2016 – 9 Sept 2016
Municipalities hit
1
counties
Started on
1 Sept
2016
Heat detections
149
in a single hotspot: 182 MW
Danger at start
66
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
611MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 1 Sept9 Sept
9 Sept 2016

How it evolved, day by day

1 Sept 2016 · 52 MW · 6 2 Sept 2016 · 1,477 MW · 30 3 Sept 2016 · 477 MW · 13 4 Sept 2016 · 160 MW · 5 5 Sept 2016 · 1,245 MW · 26 6 Sept 2016 · 1,415 MW · 43 7 Sept 2016 · 552 MW · 14 8 Sept 2016 · 64 MW · 7 9 Sept 2016 · 56 MW · 5
2 Sept 5 Sept 7 Sept 9 Sept

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

48°high
72km/h · peak gust
7%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.8% of the area of London (13 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Khoramshahr where it started
    1,268 ha reached on 1 Sept
    0.6 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with 60 days without rain: 27 % of the area in Iran

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
1 Sept 46.3 °C 19 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
2 Sept 48.3 °C 10 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 65
3 Sept 47.9 °C 10 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 69
4 Sept 48.3 °C 10 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 87
5 Sept 45.8 °C 8 % 62 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 110
6 Sept 45.6 °C 7 % 72 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 122
7 Sept 42.1 °C 9 % 63 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 112
8 Sept 42.3 °C 10 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 87
9 Sept 41.5 °C 11 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 62
10 Sept after 41.9 °C 12 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 60
11 Sept after 43.7 °C 9 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 62
12 Sept after 44.9 °C 7 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 77
13 Sept after 43.6 °C 8 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 77
14 Sept after 43.3 °C 8 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
15 Sept after 44.3 °C 9 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
16 Sept after 45.0 °C 10 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 68
17 Sept after 44.9 °C 7 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 76
18 Sept after 43.0 °C 14 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 84
19 Sept after 39.1 °C 10 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 82

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 66.0, a minimum humidity of 19% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 11.

FWI at the start 66.0
Minimum humidity 19 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Al-Kahla fire, September 2025
1,582 ha 41 days FWI 69.2 Min. humidity 15 % 102 km away, in 2025

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

Fires in the area that started in similar weather: 11. With fewer than 15 we give no figures: they would be more noise than signal.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
72km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 9 Sept, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 25 Aug 2016
After · 16 Sept 2016

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 149Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Iran

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Khoramshahr fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 1 September 2016 and 9 September 2016: 9 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,261 hectares (12.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Khoramshahr (1,268 ha, 0.6 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 48.3 °C, humidity dropped to 7 % and gusts hit 72 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 122, class Very extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Iran (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 125 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 125.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 149 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.