Skip to content
worldfires
ZW · Zimbabwe · –

Hurungwe fire, 18 September 2022 Kariba, Hurungwe

Out · last detection 29 Sept 2022, 23:12 UTC

The fire started on 18 September 2022 in Hurungwe, Zimbabwe, and satellites saw it burning for 11 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 33,783 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 2th largest in Mashonaland West since 2016 (of 644 with a page). Number 4 in Zimbabwe in 2022, of 346.

Burnt area
33,783ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
11days
18 Sept 2022 – 28 Sept 2022
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
18 Sept
2022
Heat detections
1,015
in a single hotspot: 80 MW
Danger at start
62
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
586MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 18 Sept28 Sept
29 Sept 2022

How it evolved, day by day

18 Sept 2022 · 630 MW · 60 19 Sept 2022 · 488 MW · 82 20 Sept 2022 · 726 MW · 109 21 Sept 2022 · 746 MW · 103 22 Sept 2022 · 1,275 MW · 190 23 Sept 2022 · 1,302 MW · 200 24 Sept 2022 · 1,136 MW · 129 25 Sept 2022 · 393 MW · 48 26 Sept 2022 · 103 MW · 25 27 Sept 2022 · 181 MW · 44 28 Sept 2022 · 14 MW · 7 29 Sept 2022 · 41 MW · 18
18 Sept 23 Sept 27 Sept

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

35°high
57km/h · peak gust
17%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

80% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 12,664 ha in 2016, 11,029 ha in 2017, 9,491 ha in 2018, 13,922 ha in 2019, 8,200 ha in 2020, 3,829 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 26,956 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 21% of the area of London (338 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. 23,760 ha reached on 19 Sept
    2.9 %
  2. Hurungwe where it started
    10,149 ha reached on 18 Sept
    0.5 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with 60 days without rain: 63 % of the area in Zimbabwe

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
18 Sept 32.6 °C 19 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 62
19 Sept 34.6 °C 19 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 73
20 Sept 35.2 °C 17 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 70
21 Sept 34.4 °C 20 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 67
22 Sept 34.2 °C 22 % 57 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 76
23 Sept 34.0 °C 21 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 72
24 Sept 33.1 °C 19 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 77
25 Sept 32.0 °C 24 % 55 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 72
26 Sept 33.8 °C 21 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 63
27 Sept 34.9 °C 20 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 68
28 Sept 33.4 °C 21 % 54 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 78
29 Sept after 31.6 °C 19 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 62
30 Sept after 32.4 °C 19 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 63
1 Oct after 33.4 °C 20 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 65
2 Oct after 34.3 °C 15 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 72
3 Oct after 34.4 °C 19 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 64
4 Oct after 35.5 °C 16 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
5 Oct after 36.1 °C 16 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 78
6 Oct after 34.5 °C 15 % 56 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 91
7 Oct after 35.8 °C 12 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 84
8 Oct after 34.4 °C 15 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 90

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 61.5, a minimum humidity of 19% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 16.

FWI at the start 61.5
Minimum humidity 19 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Hurungwe fire, August 2020
1,066 ha 2 days FWI 61.8 Min. humidity 20 % 22 km away, in 2020

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

4 days
median duration
1,582 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
5.5 mm
rain at the end (median; 4 of 16 had it)

It was 21.4 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 11 days, against 4 days.

None of its 16 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 12 of 16, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.5 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
57km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 28 Sept, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 4 of 16, with a median of 5.5 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 11 Sept 2022
After · 5 Oct 2022

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 20 September 2022 the air beside the fire reached 68 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 37: 2.5 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak68 µg/m³
Days over the guideline8 days
PM1097 µg/m³
Optical depth1.14
16 Sept19 Sept22 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 1,015Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Zimbabwe

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Hurungwe fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 18 September 2022 to 28 September 2022 (11 days). The perimeter dates it from 18 September 2022 to 27 September 2022.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 33,783 hectares (337.8 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Kariba (23,760 ha, 2.9 %); Hurungwe (10,149 ha, 0.5 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 35.2 °C, humidity dropped to 17 % and gusts hit 57 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 78, class Very extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Zimbabwe (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 16. Their median duration was 4 days and their median area 1,582 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. None of its 16 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 12 of 16, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.5 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 27 September 2022 → 28 September 2022.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 18 September 2022 to 27 September 2022. 1,015 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.