Burned area
satellite only130ha
Perimeter published by EFFIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- EFFIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- perimeter revised on 14 August 2022
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
BG · Bulgaria ·
Haskovo fire, August 2022 Хасково · Harmanli, Haskovo
Out · last detection 10 Aug 2022, 12:06 UTC
The fire started on 10 August 2022 in Haskovo, Bulgaria, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 130 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 43th largest in Haskovo since 2016 (of 46 with a page). Number 34 in Bulgaria in 2022, of 41.
The power measured by the satellite is low (20.6 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-24matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only1day
10 Aug 2022 to 10 Aug 2022: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- EFFIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 10 Aug 2022, 12:06 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only10 Aug 2022
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- EFFIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 10 Aug 2022
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Hotspots
satellite only6
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 21 MW.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP + NOAA-20)
- Date
- 10 Aug 2022 – 10 Aug 2022
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only55MW
Total radiative power on 10 August 2022; hotspots that day: 6.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 10 Aug 2022
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model44.9FWI · very high
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 22.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 10 Aug 2022, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model31.3°C · 36% RH
High of 31.3 °C and minimum humidity of 36% on 10 August 2022; gusts of 50 km/h on 10 August 2022.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 10 Aug 2022 – 10 Aug 2022
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
· reconstructed perimeterEFFIS (Copernicus) revises the perimeter
What was saved on 24 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 130 ha
- Dates
- 10 Aug 2022 – 10 Aug 2022
- Name
- Haskovo
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/haskovo-2022-08?v=2026-10-24A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire haskovo-2022-08.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | 6 | 55 | 31.3 | 22.6 | 36 | 22.7 | 49.7 | 0 | 44.9 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2022-08-11 | 0 | 0 | 31.8 | 20.6 | 32 | 14.7 | 34.6 | 0 | 37.3 | alto | 0 |
| 2022-08-12 | 0 | 0 | 32.3 | 19.3 | 29 | 13.5 | 32.4 | 0 | 36.5 | alto | 0 |
| 2022-08-13 | 0 | 0 | 31.4 | 19.1 | 35 | 21.3 | 27.7 | 0 | 42.9 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2022-08-14 | 0 | 0 | 30.4 | 20.1 | 42 | 12.6 | 34.6 | 5.8 | 6.7 | bajo | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: EFFIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 130ha
- Copernicus perimeter
- Duration
- 1day
- 10 Aug 2022 – 10 Aug 2022
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- municipalities
- Started on
- 10 Aug
- 2022
- Heat detections
- 6
- in a single hotspot: 21 MW
- Danger at start
- 45
- Very high · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 55MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
10 Aug10 Aug
How it evolved, day by day
10 Aug 2022 · 55 MW · 6
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
31°high
50km/h · peak gust
36%lowest humidity
It had gone 22 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 5.8 mm on 14 Aug.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
What happened to each town
-
130 ha reached on 10 Aug0.2 %
-
0 ha0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
What burned
- Other natural land46 %
- Agricultural areas29 %
- Scrub and transitional woodland24 %
- Broadleaved forest1.5 %
Natura 2000 protected area affected: 94 %
- ZEPA Harmanliyska reka BG0002092
- LIC Ostar kamak BG0001034
Natura 2000 sites (European Environment Agency, 2024 release) crossed by the perimeter.
Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug | 31.3 °C | 36 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 11 Aug after | 31.8 °C | 32 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 12 Aug after | 32.3 °C | 29 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 13 Aug after | 31.4 °C | 35 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 14 Aug after | 30.4 °C | 42 % | 35 km/h | 5.8 mm | Low 7 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 44.9, a minimum humidity of 36% and 22 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 22.
FWI at the start
44.9
Minimum humidity
36 %
Days without rain
22
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Haskovo fire, August 2022
130 ha
1 day
FWI 44.9
Min. humidity 36 %
Svilengrad fire, August 2017
540 ha
3 days
FWI 49.9
Min. humidity 36 %
62 km away, in 2017
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 3.2 mm on 21 Aug.
Svilengrad fire, August 2020
143 ha
2 days
FWI 46.2
Min. humidity 36 %
59 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.3 mm on 16 Aug.
Elhovo fire, August 2020
1,167 ha
3 days
FWI 44.3
Min. humidity 33 %
63 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.5 mm on 13 Aug.
Straldzha fire, July 2025
220 ha
1 day
FWI 44.2
Min. humidity 38 %
95 km away, in 2025
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.9 mm on 29 Jul.
Gelibolu fire, July 2025
553 ha
3 days
FWI 43.0
Min. humidity 35 %
165 km away, in 2025
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
What happened to them
- 2 days
- median duration
- 413 ha
- median area
- 23 %
- went past 1,000 ha
- 1.9 mm
- rain at the end (median; 16 of 22 had it)
It stayed below its twins: 130 ha against a median of 413 ha. It lasted 1 day, against 2 days.
In 6 of 22, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.9 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
5.8 mmfirst rain
14 Aug4 days after it ended
50km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 10 Aug, and on 14 Aug 5.8 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 16 of 22, with a median of 1.9 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 3 Aug 2022
After · 17 Aug 2022
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 13 August 2022 the air beside the fire reached 10 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but no daily average passed the WHO guideline (15).
PM2.5 peak10 µg/m³
Days over the guideline0 days
PM1018 µg/m³
Optical depth0.28
8 Aug10 Aug12 Aug
Good
Fair
Moderate
Poor
Very poor
Extremely poor
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 6Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 2,719 haHarmanli ХарманлиAugust 2025 · 5 days · 22 km away
- 1,446 haHarmanli ХарманлиJune 2024 · 2 days · 30 km away
- 1,168 haLyubimets ЛюбимецAugust 2016 · 3 days · 30 km away
- 1,374 haSvilengrad СвиленградAugust 2023 · 2 days · 33 km away
- 1,259 haTopolovgrad Тополовград30 August 2016 · 3 days · 33 km away
- 1,109 haMineralni Bani Минерални баниJuly 2023 · 2 days · 34 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Haskovo fire last?
- Copernicus dates it between 10 August 2022 and 10 August 2022: 1 day between the first and last image with fire.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 130 hectares (1.3 km²). Official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Harmanli (130 ha, 0.2 %); Haskovo (0 ha, 0.0 %).
- Did the fire reach a town?
- The fire came within 8.3 km of the centre of Harmanli, the closest of the areas it touched. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 31.3 °C, humidity dropped to 36 % and gusts hit 50 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 45, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Bulgaria (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 22. Their median duration was 2 days and their median area 413 ha; 23 % went past 1,000 ha. In 6 of 22, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.9 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 6 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.