Skip to content
worldfires
PT · Portugal · →

Gralhas fire, 5 February 2023 Gralhas, Meixedo e Padornelos

Out · last detection 5 Feb 2023, 13:43 UTC

The fire started on 5 February 2023 in Gralhas, Portugal, and satellites saw it burning for 2 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 114 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across 2 municipalities.

This entry is most likely a pasture burn or a prescribed winter burn in northern Portugal, not a wildfire. In these hills scrub is burnt to renew grazing, and this fire is not in the ICNF register of rural fires. This is our assumption, based on the time of year and the lack of an official record; it is not confirmed. That is why it is left out of the wildfire rankings.

The power measured by the satellite is low (8.1 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Compare with…
Burnt area
114ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
2days
5 Feb 2023 – 6 Feb 2023
Municipalities hit
2
freguesias
Started on
5 Feb
2023
Heat detections
7
in a single hotspot: 8 MW
Danger at start
3
Very low · FWI index
Average daily power
30MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 5 Feb6 Feb

How it evolved, day by day

5 Feb 2023 · 30 MW · 7

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

9°high
43km/h · peak gust
39%lowest humidity

It had gone 16 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

70% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 24 ha in 2016, 70 ha in 2019, 1 ha in 2021, 2 ha in 2022. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 80 ha that had burned before.

What happened to each town

  1. Gralhas 186 inhabitants · 2.2 km from the centre where it started
    90 ha reached on 5 Feb
    4.2 %
  2. Meixedo e Padornelos 265 inhabitants · 1.0 km from the centre
    24 ha reached on 5 Feb
    0.7 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Other natural land88 %
  • Broadleaved forest12 %

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
5 Feb 8.5 °C 40 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 3
6 Feb 8.7 °C 39 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 3
7 Feb after 6.7 °C 41 % 34 km/h 0.1 mm Very low 3
8 Feb after 6.9 °C 47 % 47 km/h 0.4 mm Very low 4
9 Feb after 7.4 °C 41 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 3
10 Feb after 6.9 °C 37 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 3
11 Feb after 6.7 °C 39 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 3
12 Feb after 6.6 °C 46 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 3
13 Feb after 9.2 °C 49 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 3
14 Feb after 9.7 °C 47 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 4
15 Feb after 11.4 °C 45 % 21 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 3
16 Feb after 12.2 °C 45 % 19 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 3

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 29 Jan 2023
After · 13 Feb 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 6 February 2023 the air beside the fire reached 15 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but no daily average passed the WHO guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak15 µg/m³
Days over the guideline0 days
PM1019 µg/m³
Optical depth0.11
3456789
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 7Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Portugal ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Gralhas fire last?
Copernicus dates it between 5 February 2023 and 6 February 2023: 2 days between the first and last image with fire.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 114 hectares (1.1 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Gralhas (90 ha, 4.2 %); Meixedo e Padornelos (24 ha, 0.7 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire came within 1.0 km of the centre of Meixedo e Padornelos, the closest of the areas it touched. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 8.7 °C, humidity dropped to 39 % and gusts hit 43 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 3, class Very low.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Portugal (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings ›

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

No changes since 24 October 2026.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 7 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Probably a vegetation burn: not counted in the totals.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.