Skip to content
worldfires
CN · China · –

Gongzhuling City fire, October 2017 公主岭市 · Gongzhuling City, Luyuan District

Out · last measured on 6 Nov 2017

The fire started on 27 October 2017 in Gongzhuling City, China, and satellites saw it burning for 11 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 4,392 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 33th largest in Jilin Province since 2016 (of 394 with a page). Number 15 in China in 2017, of 243.

We have the GWIS perimeter for this fire, but the VIIRS sensors did not capture it in enough detail: no day-by-day evolution, but the split by municipality is there.

Burnt area
4,392ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
11days
27 Oct 2017 – 6 Nov 2017
Municipalities hit
2
counties
Started on
27 Oct
2017
Danger at start
17
Moderate · FWI index

Where it burned

The weather it burned in

18°high
56km/h · peak gust
20%lowest humidity

It had gone 6 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2.8% of the area of London (44 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Gongzhuling City 公主岭市 where it started
    4,381 ha
    1.1 %
  2. Luyuan District 绿园区
    58 ha
    0.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area89 ha
Residents≈ 5,200

Inside the perimeter there were about 89 hectares of built-up land and about 5,200 residents (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
27 Oct 17.8 °C 45 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
28 Oct 14.7 °C 26 % 54 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
29 Oct 5.8 °C 24 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
30 Oct 10.1 °C 21 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 18
31 Oct 15.5 °C 25 % 53 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
1 Nov 12.2 °C 20 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
2 Nov 3.8 °C 43 % 26 km/h 1.0 mm Low 7
3 Nov 2.7 °C 32 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Low 10
4 Nov 7.0 °C 26 % 51 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
5 Nov 14.7 °C 38 % 56 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
6 Nov 15.7 °C 44 % 51 km/h 0.2 mm Moderate 20
7 Nov after 12.6 °C 54 % 53 km/h 0.9 mm Moderate 12
8 Nov after 5.4 °C 34 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Low 11
9 Nov after 9.1 °C 33 % 58 km/h 0.4 mm Moderate 21
10 Nov after 8.5 °C 48 % 56 km/h 0.8 mm Moderate 14
11 Nov after 3.6 °C 42 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Low 11
12 Nov after 9.1 °C 50 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 15
13 Nov after 4.7 °C 31 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
14 Nov after -1.2 °C 25 % 54 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
15 Nov after -3.5 °C 39 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
16 Nov after -2.3 °C 29 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 13

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 17.4, a minimum humidity of 45% and 6 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 16.

FWI at the start 17.4
Minimum humidity 45 %
Days without rain 6
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Yushu City fire, November 2020
1,162 ha 4 days FWI 10.3 Min. humidity 44 % 188 km away, in 2020

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 7.1 mm on 17 Nov.

What happened to them

4 days
median duration
1,416 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
7.0 mm
rain at the end (median; 14 of 16 had it)

It was 3.1 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 11 days, against 4 days.

Only 3 of its 16 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 2 of 16, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 7.0 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
56km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 6 Nov, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 14 of 16, with a median of 7.0 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 20 Oct 2017
After · 13 Nov 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Other fires nearby

All fires in China

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Gongzhuling City fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 27 October 2017 and 6 November 2017: 11 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 4,392 hectares (43.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Gongzhuling City (4,381 ha, 1.1 %); Luyuan District (58 ha, 0.2 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 17.8 °C, humidity dropped to 20 % and gusts hit 56 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 27, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of China (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 16. Their median duration was 4 days and their median area 1,416 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 3 of its 16 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 2 of 16, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 7.0 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 119 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 119.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.