Burned area
satellite only5,487ha
Perimeter published by GWIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 5 Sept 2020 – 19 Sept 2020
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
BR · Brazil · –
Gaúcha do Norte fire, 5 September 2020 Querência, Gaúcha do Norte
Out · last detection 19 Sept 2020, 16:43 UTC
The fire started on 5 September 2020 in Gaúcha do Norte, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 15 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,487 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 921th largest in Mato Grosso since 2016 (of 1874 with a page). Number 458 in Brazil in 2020, of 957.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-27matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only15days
5 Sept 2020 to 19 Sept 2020: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 19 Sept 2020, 16:43 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only5 Sept 2020
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 5 Sept 2020
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
The worst day
satellite only1,713MW
Total radiative power on 13 September 2020; hotspots that day: 44.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 13 Sept 2020
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model42.4FWI · very high
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 60.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 5 Sept 2020, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model37.3°C · 24% RH
High of 37.3 °C and minimum humidity of 24% on 18 September 2020; gusts of 40 km/h on 13 September 2020.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 5 Sept 2020 – 19 Sept 2020
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
-
logStart date: 29 August 2020 → 5 September 2020.
-
logName: Querência → Gaúcha do Norte.
-
logStart date: 5 September 2020 → 29 August 2020.
Area logged each night
Move the slider to see which area the page published each day.
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/gaucha-do-norte-2020-09-6?v=2026-10-27A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire gaucha-do-norte-2020-09-6.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-05 | 5 | 20 | 35.6 | 19.1 | 23 | 12.9 | 31 | 0 | 42.4 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-06 | 6 | 21 | 37 | 18.6 | 23 | 10.5 | 24.8 | 0 | 40.4 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-07 | 12 | 56 | 35.7 | 19.8 | 27 | 10.5 | 24.8 | 0 | 39.7 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-08 | 11 | 68 | 36.5 | 19.4 | 24 | 11.3 | 30.6 | 0 | 40.8 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-09 | 4 | 16 | 36 | 19.6 | 27 | 11.5 | 26.3 | 0 | 41 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-10 | 12 | 200 | 36.7 | 21.6 | 26 | 12.3 | 28.1 | 0 | 42 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-11 | 64 | 316 | 36.6 | 19.9 | 23 | 12 | 29.5 | 0 | 42 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-12 | 53 | 564 | 36.6 | 19 | 24 | 12.4 | 32 | 0 | 42.7 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-13 | 44 | 1,713 | 35.8 | 19.9 | 20 | 16.2 | 40.3 | 0 | 46.9 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-14 | 19 | 195 | 34.7 | 18.7 | 24 | 11.8 | 29.5 | 0 | 42.6 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-15 | 2 | 15 | 35.7 | 21.1 | 24 | 12.9 | 31 | 0 | 43.9 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-16 | 6 | 52 | 34.6 | 20.7 | 29 | 9.3 | 22 | 0 | 37.7 | alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-17 | 11 | 60 | 35.2 | 22 | 30 | 8.3 | 20.2 | 0 | 36.2 | alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-18 | 10 | 62 | 37.3 | 21.1 | 24 | 10.6 | 25.2 | 0 | 38.4 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-19 | 2 | 10 | 35.7 | 20.8 | 35 | 9 | 22.7 | 0 | 34.4 | alto | 1 |
| 2020-09-20 | 0 | 0 | 34.6 | 22.6 | 40 | 13.7 | 35.3 | 0 | 34.9 | alto | 0 |
| 2020-09-21 | 0 | 0 | 34.8 | 22.3 | 40 | 11.4 | 25.9 | 0.2 | 32.8 | alto | 0 |
| 2020-09-22 | 0 | 0 | 28.3 | 21.7 | 69 | 11.8 | 30.6 | 8.8 | 1.7 | muy_bajo | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 5,487ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 15days
- 5 Sept 2020 – 19 Sept 2020
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- municipalities
- Started on
- 5 Sept
- 2020
- Heat detections
- 261
- in a single hotspot: 0 MW
- Danger at start
- 42
- Very high · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 224MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
5 Sept19 Sept
19 Sept 2020
How it evolved, day by day
5 Sept
8 Sept
13 Sept
17 Sept
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
37°high
40km/h · peak gust
20%lowest humidity
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 8.8 mm on 22 Sept.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Querência 26,769 inhabitants4,698 ha0.3 %
-
815 ha0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Started with 60 days without rain: 55 % of the area in Brazil
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept | 35.6 °C | 23 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 6 Sept | 37.0 °C | 23 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 7 Sept | 35.7 °C | 27 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 8 Sept | 36.5 °C | 24 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 9 Sept | 36.0 °C | 27 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 10 Sept | 36.7 °C | 26 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 11 Sept | 36.6 °C | 23 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 12 Sept | 36.6 °C | 24 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 13 Sept | 35.8 °C | 20 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 14 Sept | 34.7 °C | 24 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 15 Sept | 35.7 °C | 24 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 16 Sept | 34.6 °C | 29 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 17 Sept | 35.2 °C | 30 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 18 Sept | 37.3 °C | 24 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 19 Sept | 35.7 °C | 35 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 20 Sept after | 34.6 °C | 40 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 21 Sept after | 34.8 °C | 40 % | 26 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 33 |
| 22 Sept after | 28.3 °C | 69 % | 31 km/h | 8.8 mm | Very low 2 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 42.4, a minimum humidity of 23% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 22.
FWI at the start
42.4
Minimum humidity
23 %
Days without rain
60+
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Gaúcha do Norte fire, 5 September 2020
5,487 ha
15 days
FWI 42.4
Min. humidity 23 %
São Félix do Araguaia fire, August 2021
7,737 ha
21 days
FWI 42.2
Min. humidity 23 %
111 km away, in 2021
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.0 mm on 13 Sept.
Marcelândia fire, September 2024
3,086 ha
8 days
FWI 41.3
Min. humidity 23 %
123 km away, in 2024
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 2.8 mm on 30 Sept.
União do Sul fire, August 2022
3,206 ha
13 days
FWI 42.5
Min. humidity 24 %
121 km away, in 2022
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Nova Ubiratã fire, September 2019
6,500 ha
18 days
FWI 43.0
Min. humidity 23 %
165 km away, in 2019
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.5 mm on 28 Sept.
Nova Ubiratã fire, September 2019
3,652 ha
10 days
FWI 42.0
Min. humidity 23 %
190 km away, in 2019
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.6 mm on 29 Sept.
What happened to them
- 16 days
- median duration
- 5,600 ha
- median area
- 23 %
- went past 10,000 ha
- 3.1 mm
- rain at the end (median; 15 of 22 had it)
It burned an area similar to its twins (5,487 ha against a median of 5,600 ha) and lasted 15 days, against 16 days.
In 7 of 22, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.1 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
8.8 mmfirst rain
22 Sept3 days after it ended
40km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 19 Sept, and on 22 Sept 8.8 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 15 of 22, with a median of 3.1 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 29 Aug 2020
After · 26 Sept 2020
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 0Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Gaúcha do Norte fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 5 September 2020 and 19 September 2020: 15 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,487 hectares (54.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Querência (4,698 ha, 0.3 %); Gaúcha do Norte (815 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 37.3 °C, humidity dropped to 20 % and gusts hit 40 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 47, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 22. Their median duration was 16 days and their median area 5,600 ha; 23 % went past 10,000 ha. In 7 of 22, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.1 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 193 · Emergency number and official warnings
Satellite cross-check
History of this page · 3 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
- Start date: 29 August 2020 → 5 September 2020.
- Name: Querência → Gaúcha do Norte.
- Start date: 5 September 2020 → 29 August 2020.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.