Skip to content
worldfires
BR · Brazil · –

Formoso do Araguaia fire, 3 July 2016 Formoso do Araguaia, Lagoa da Confusão

Out · last detection 5 Jul 2016, 17:03 UTC

The fire started on 3 July 2016 in Formoso do Araguaia, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 3 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,144 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 474th largest in Tocantins since 2016 (of 1036 with a page). Number 265 in Brazil in 2016, of 648.

Burnt area
5,144ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
3days
3 Jul 2016 – 5 Jul 2016
Municipalities hit
2
municipalities
Started on
3 Jul
2016
Heat detections
119
in a single hotspot: 0 MW
Danger at start
42
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
381MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 3 Jul5 Jul
5 Jul 2016

How it evolved, day by day

3 Jul 2016 · 1,082 MW · 100 4 Jul 2016 · 34 MW · 10 5 Jul 2016 · 26 MW · 9
3 Jul 4 Jul 5 Jul

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

35°high
42km/h · peak gust
27%lowest humidity

It had gone 25 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 3.2% of the area of London (51 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Formoso do Araguaia where it started
    3,962 ha
    0.3 %
  2. Lagoa da Confusão 15,288 inhabitants
    1,208 ha
    0.1 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
3 Jul 33.9 °C 28 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
4 Jul 34.7 °C 27 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
5 Jul 34.7 °C 32 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
6 Jul after 35.1 °C 27 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
7 Jul after 35.3 °C 24 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
8 Jul after 36.4 °C 23 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
9 Jul after 37.2 °C 21 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
10 Jul after 36.2 °C 26 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
11 Jul after 36.4 °C 24 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
12 Jul after 35.8 °C 23 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
13 Jul after 36.6 °C 22 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
14 Jul after 37.2 °C 22 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
15 Jul after 35.5 °C 24 % 19 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 42.4, a minimum humidity of 28% and 25 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 4.

FWI at the start 42.4
Minimum humidity 28 %
Days without rain 25
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Pium fire, September 2016
6,650 ha 7 days FWI 42.8 Min. humidity 26 % 149 km away, in 2016

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

Fires in the area that started in similar weather: 4. With fewer than 15 we give no figures: they would be more noise than signal.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
42km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 5 Jul, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 26 Jun 2016
After · 12 Jul 2016

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 0Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Brazil

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Formoso do Araguaia fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 3 July 2016 and 5 July 2016: 3 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,144 hectares (51.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Formoso do Araguaia (3,962 ha, 0.3 %); Lagoa da Confusão (1,208 ha, 0.1 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 34.7 °C, humidity dropped to 27 % and gusts hit 42 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 43, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 193 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Start date: 28 June 2016 → 3 July 2016.
  2. Start date: 3 July 2016 → 28 June 2016.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 193.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.