Skip to content
worldfires
CD · Democratic Republic of the Congo · →

Faradje fire, January 2022 Faradje, Dungu

Out · last detection 31 Jan 2022, 10:46 UTC

The fire started on 26 January 2022 in Faradje, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and satellites saw it burning for 6 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,719 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 84th largest in Upper Uele since 2016 (of 101 with a page). Number 75 in Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2022, of 106.

Compare with…
Burnt area
5,719ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
6days
26 Jan 2022 – 31 Jan 2022
Municipalities hit
2
territories
Started on
26 Jan
2022
Heat detections
237
in a single hotspot: 130 MW
Danger at start
30
High · FWI index
Average daily power
391MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 26 Jan31 Jan
31 Jan 2022

How it evolved, day by day

26 Jan 2022 · 18 MW · 15 27 Jan 2022 · 509 MW · 71 28 Jan 2022 · 1,608 MW · 99 29 Jan 2022 · 90 MW · 16 30 Jan 2022 · 67 MW · 8 31 Jan 2022 · 54 MW · 11
26 Jan 27 Jan 28 Jan 29 Jan 30 Jan 31 Jan

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

34°high
46km/h · peak gust
18%lowest humidity

It had gone 8 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

99% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 2,971 ha in 2016, 3,939 ha in 2017, 2,893 ha in 2018, 3,213 ha in 2019, 858 ha in 2020, 4,018 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 5,636 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 3.6% of the area of London (57 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Faradje where it started
    5,561 ha reached on 26 Jan
    0.4 %
  2. 202 ha reached on 27 Jan
    0.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
26 Jan 33.6 °C 21 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
27 Jan 33.6 °C 21 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
28 Jan 31.2 °C 22 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
29 Jan 32.8 °C 20 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
30 Jan 32.9 °C 18 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
31 Jan 32.7 °C 19 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
1 Feb after 33.0 °C 22 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
2 Feb after 33.5 °C 19 % 22 km/h 0.1 mm High 30
3 Feb after 34.7 °C 20 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
4 Feb after 34.2 °C 20 % 19 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
5 Feb after 32.4 °C 19 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
6 Feb after 32.0 °C 15 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
7 Feb after 32.3 °C 19 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
8 Feb after 34.1 °C 15 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
9 Feb after 34.8 °C 19 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
10 Feb after 35.9 °C 19 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 19 Jan 2022
After · 7 Feb 2022

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 237Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Democratic Republic of the Congo ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Faradje fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 26 January 2022 and 31 January 2022: 6 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,719 hectares (57.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Faradje (5,561 ha, 0.4 %); Dungu (202 ha, 0.0 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 33.6 °C, humidity dropped to 18 % and gusts hit 46 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 33, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Democratic Republic of the Congo (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

No changes since 24 October 2026.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 237 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.