Ezo fire, 27 December 2022 Ezo, Nagero
The fire started on 27 December 2022 in Ezo, South Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 20 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 34,202 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 29th largest in Western Equatoria since 2016 (of 361 with a page). Number 6 in South Sudan in 2022, of 124.
Compare with…
Suggestions: Ezo · 2019Ezo · 2020Ezo · 2020Ezo · 2021
- Burnt area
- 34,202ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 20days
- 27 Dec 2022 – 15 Jan 2023
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- counties
- Started on
- 27 Dec
- 2022
- Heat detections
- 1,417
- in a single hotspot: 134 MW
- Danger at start
- 37
- High · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 605MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 7 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
92% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 18,217 ha in 2016, 10,755 ha in 2017, 607 ha in 2018, 11,013 ha in 2019, 19,593 ha in 2020, 16,460 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 31,311 ha that had burned before.
- 7,798 ha Ezo fire, December 2019 72,777 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 6,201 ha Ezo fire, January 2020 10,339 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 3,519 ha Ezo fire, December 2020 6,117 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 3,494 ha Ezo fire, December 2021 5,729 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 3,394 ha Ezo fire, December 2020 13,110 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 3,359 ha Ezo fire, December 2016 7,078 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,676 ha Ezo fire, December 2016 21,896 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,556 ha Ezo fire, January 2016 5,810 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Ezo where it started34,198 ha reached on 21 Dec4.2 %
-
256 ha reached on 3 Jan0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Dec | 34.6 °C | 22 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 22 Dec | 35.1 °C | 21 % | 21 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 23 Dec | 34.9 °C | 18 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 24 Dec | 33.7 °C | 21 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 25 Dec | 33.1 °C | 17 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 26 Dec | 32.4 °C | 16 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 27 Dec | 31.7 °C | 16 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 28 Dec | 33.2 °C | 15 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 29 Dec | 33.6 °C | 15 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 30 Dec | 33.8 °C | 19 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 31 Dec | 34.2 °C | 21 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 1 Jan | 35.1 °C | 19 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 2 Jan | 35.0 °C | 23 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 3 Jan | 34.9 °C | 26 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 4 Jan | 35.1 °C | 22 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 5 Jan | 34.6 °C | 21 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 6 Jan | 35.4 °C | 17 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 7 Jan | 34.7 °C | 16 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 8 Jan | 34.4 °C | 15 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 9 Jan | 36.4 °C | 14 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 10 Jan | 33.0 °C | 14 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 11 Jan | 33.4 °C | 11 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 12 Jan | 34.0 °C | 12 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 13 Jan | 34.3 °C | 16 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 14 Jan | 35.0 °C | 16 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 15 Jan | 35.5 °C | 15 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 16 Jan after | 36.5 °C | 13 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 17 Jan after | 36.0 °C | 15 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 18 Jan after | 36.6 °C | 15 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 19 Jan after | 36.8 °C | 16 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 20 Jan after | 37.4 °C | 14 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 21 Jan after | 37.2 °C | 11 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 22 Jan after | 37.0 °C | 13 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 23 Jan after | 37.0 °C | 13 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 24 Jan after | 37.3 °C | 10 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 25 Jan after | 36.4 °C | 16 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 26 Jan after | 35.5 °C | 18 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 27 Jan after | 37.9 °C | 12 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 28 Jan after | 38.8 °C | 12 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 29 Jan after | 38.0 °C | 13 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 30 Jan after | 37.4 °C | 14 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 1,417Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 91,824 haNagero20 December 2024 · 29 days · 8 km away
- 35,433 haEzo20 December 2021 · 22 days · 14 km away
- 26,389 haEzo7 January 2024 · 10 days · 15 km away
- 72,777 haEzo22 December 2019 · 25 days · 22 km away
- 88,595 haNagero10 December 2025 · 20 days · 28 km away
- 22,203 haEzo30 December 2025 · 10 days · 32 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Ezo fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 27 December 2022 and 15 January 2023: 20 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 34,202 hectares (342.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Ezo (34,198 ha, 4.2 %); Nagero (256 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 37.4 °C, humidity dropped to 11 % and gusts hit 44 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 54, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of South Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 1,417 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.