Cuangar fire, 16 August 2026 Cuangar
The fire started on 16 August 2026 in Cuangar, Angola, and satellites saw it burning for 25 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 15,653 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 75th largest in Cuando Cubango since 2016 (of 658 with a page). Number 84 in Angola in 2026, of 485.
- Burnt area
- 15,653ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 25days
- 16 Aug 2026 – 9 Sept 2026
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- municipalities
- Started on
- 16 Aug
- 2026
- Heat detections
- 330
- in a single hotspot: 60 MW
- Danger at start
- 49
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 3.6GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
91% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 3,521 ha in 2016, 5,052 ha in 2017, 2,124 ha in 2018, 4,051 ha in 2019, 3,166 ha in 2020, 3,939 ha in 2021, 3,822 ha in 2022, 3,905 ha in 2023, 250 ha in 2024, 5,345 ha in 2025. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 14,259 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
Cuangar where it started15,753 ha reached on 16 Aug0.8 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug | 27.7 °C | 18 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 17 Aug | 28.9 °C | 12 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 18 Aug | 30.6 °C | 11 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 19 Aug | 32.0 °C | 7 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 61 |
| 20 Aug | 32.3 °C | 10 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 63 |
| 21 Aug | 31.3 °C | 13 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 66 |
| 22 Aug | 31.3 °C | 12 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 23 Aug | 32.5 °C | 15 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 66 |
| 24 Aug | 33.0 °C | 12 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 65 |
| 25 Aug | 32.3 °C | 13 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 26 Aug | 32.7 °C | 12 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 27 Aug | 32.8 °C | 12 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 62 |
| 28 Aug | 30.9 °C | 13 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 65 |
| 29 Aug | 30.6 °C | 13 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 61 |
| 30 Aug | 32.8 °C | 8 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 31 Aug | 34.4 °C | 14 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 1 Sept | 34.6 °C | 12 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 2 Sept | 34.1 °C | 12 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 3 Sept | 35.1 °C | 11 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 4 Sept | 32.9 °C | 7 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 5 Sept | 31.2 °C | 10 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 6 Sept | 33.1 °C | 10 % | 19 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 7 Sept | 35.1 °C | 10 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 8 Sept | 34.1 °C | 20 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 62 |
| 9 Sept | 31.5 °C | 23 % | 55 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 62 |
| 10 Sept after | 31.1 °C | 20 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 11 Sept after | 32.5 °C | 14 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 12 Sept after | 34.4 °C | 12 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 13 Sept after | 35.8 °C | 15 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 14 Sept after | 33.5 °C | 21 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 15 Sept after | 35.9 °C | 14 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 16 Sept after | 36.9 °C | 17 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 17 Sept after | 36.7 °C | 11 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 18 Sept after | 35.1 °C | 17 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 70 |
| 19 Sept after | 30.5 °C | 23 % | 37 km/h | 0.3 mm | Very high 50 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 29 August 2026 the air beside the fire reached 78 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 39: 2.6 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 330Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Cuangar fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 16 August 2026 to 9 September 2026 (25 days). The perimeter dates it from 16 August 2026 to 5 September 2026.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 15,653 hectares (156.5 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Cuangar (15,753 ha, 0.8 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 35.1 °C, humidity dropped to 7 % and gusts hit 55 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 66, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Angola (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.