Corumbá fire, 14 July 2020 Corumbá, Ladário
The fire started on 14 July 2020 in Corumbá, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 24 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 41,691 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 25th largest in Mato Grosso do Sul since 2016 (of 506 with a page). Number 31 in Brazil in 2020, of 957.
- Burnt area
- 41,691ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 24days
- 14 Jul 2020 – 6 Aug 2020
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- municipalities
- Started on
- 14 Jul
- 2020
- Heat detections
- 3,983
- in a single hotspot: 286 MW
- Danger at start
- 33
- High · FWI index
- Energy released
- 47.3GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 9 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.1 mm on 16 Aug.
This area had burned before
13% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,554 ha in 2017, 4,930 ha in 2019. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 5,217 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
41,587 ha reached on 14 Jul0.6 %
-
Ladário 21,522 inhabitants276 ha reached on 15 Jul0.8 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Jul | 32.8 °C | 32 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 8 Jul | 20.5 °C | 66 % | 48 km/h | 0.9 mm | Moderate 14 |
| 9 Jul | 22.1 °C | 56 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 13 |
| 10 Jul | 29.8 °C | 46 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 23 |
| 11 Jul | 32.5 °C | 32 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 12 Jul | 33.7 °C | 34 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 13 Jul | 33.4 °C | 37 % | 31 km/h | 0.4 mm | High 29 |
| 14 Jul | 30.1 °C | 53 % | 27 km/h | 0.9 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 15 Jul | 32.0 °C | 47 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 18 |
| 16 Jul | 33.9 °C | 25 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 17 Jul | 34.1 °C | 23 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 18 Jul | 33.5 °C | 28 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 19 Jul | 33.3 °C | 29 % | 52 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 20 Jul | 33.0 °C | 29 % | 53 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 21 Jul | 32.6 °C | 27 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 22 Jul | 32.8 °C | 24 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 23 Jul | 33.6 °C | 26 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 24 Jul | 33.1 °C | 34 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 25 Jul | 22.8 °C | 44 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 26 Jul | 28.1 °C | 40 % | 18 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 27 Jul | 32.0 °C | 32 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 28 Jul | 32.4 °C | 33 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 29 Jul | 22.6 °C | 43 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 30 Jul | 28.1 °C | 36 % | 21 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 31 Jul | 32.3 °C | 35 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 1 Aug | 34.7 °C | 22 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 2 Aug | 33.9 °C | 21 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 3 Aug | 33.9 °C | 21 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 4 Aug | 33.9 °C | 20 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 5 Aug | 33.8 °C | 16 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 6 Aug | 33.7 °C | 21 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 7 Aug after | 33.5 °C | 20 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 8 Aug after | 34.2 °C | 20 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 9 Aug after | 34.4 °C | 17 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 10 Aug after | 34.4 °C | 22 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 11 Aug after | 34.6 °C | 25 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 12 Aug after | 28.6 °C | 29 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 13 Aug after | 33.1 °C | 35 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 14 Aug after | 37.1 °C | 24 % | 55 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 15 Aug after | 36.4 °C | 32 % | 53 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 16 Aug after | 30.8 °C | 53 % | 36 km/h | 1.1 mm | Moderate 18 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 3,983Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 122,759 haCorumbá12 September 2021 · 25 days · 16 km away
- 43,561 haCorumbá2 March 2020 · 18 days · 16 km away
- 48,746 haCorumbá4 June 2024 · 26 days · 17 km away
- 147,481 haCorumbá5 June 2024 · 32 days · 22 km away
- 22,659 haCorumbá30 July 2020 · 15 days · 24 km away
- 21,988 haCorumbá17 July 2024 · 22 days · 27 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Corumbá fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 14 July 2020 and 6 August 2020: 24 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 41,691 hectares (416.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Corumbá (41,587 ha, 0.6 %); Ladário (276 ha, 0.8 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 34.7 °C, humidity dropped to 16 % and gusts hit 54 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 57, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 193
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.