Chitambo fire, 29 July 2026 Chitambo
The fire started on 29 July 2026 in Chitambo, Zambia, and satellites saw it burning for 37 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 19,155 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 20th largest in Central since 2016 (of 400 with a page). Number 38 in Zambia in 2026, of 604.
- Burnt area
- 19,155ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 37days
- 29 Jul 2026 – 3 Sept 2026
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- districts
- Started on
- 29 Jul
- 2026
- Heat detections
- 574
- in a single hotspot: 66 MW
- Danger at start
- 35
- High · FWI index
- Energy released
- 5.0GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
85% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,918 ha in 2016, 5,067 ha in 2017, 5,043 ha in 2018, 5,373 ha in 2019, 2,811 ha in 2020, 6,348 ha in 2021, 6,323 ha in 2022, 4,412 ha in 2023, 5,528 ha in 2024, 5,774 ha in 2025. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 16,296 ha that had burned before.
- 2,965 ha Chitambo fire, July 2024 6,692 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,815 ha Chitambo fire, August 2025 4,497 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,322 ha Chitambo fire, July 2021 3,230 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,908 ha Chitambo fire, August 2020 3,971 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,125 ha Chitambo fire, August 2023 3,401 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,069 ha Chitambo fire, August 2025 3,443 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 242 ha Chitambo fire, August 2018 3,117 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
What happened to each town
-
Chitambo where it started19,230 ha reached on 29 Jul1.6 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Jul | 27.2 °C | 26 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 30 Jul | 27.2 °C | 28 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 31 Jul | 26.1 °C | 25 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 1 Aug | 24.4 °C | 31 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 2 Aug | 24.2 °C | 32 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 3 Aug | 24.8 °C | 33 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 4 Aug | 25.5 °C | 32 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 5 Aug | 26.1 °C | 31 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 6 Aug | 27.1 °C | 33 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 7 Aug | 27.5 °C | 36 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 8 Aug | 26.8 °C | 37 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 9 Aug | 27.7 °C | 33 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 10 Aug | 29.5 °C | 29 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 11 Aug | 29.7 °C | 28 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 12 Aug | 28.0 °C | 31 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 13 Aug | 24.2 °C | 45 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 14 Aug | 22.8 °C | 46 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 15 Aug | 24.3 °C | 35 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 16 Aug | 24.9 °C | 30 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 17 Aug | 26.1 °C | 26 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 18 Aug | 27.1 °C | 24 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 19 Aug | 26.4 °C | 27 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 20 Aug | 26.3 °C | 32 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 21 Aug | 27.0 °C | 30 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 22 Aug | 27.6 °C | 32 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 23 Aug | 27.8 °C | 34 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 24 Aug | 28.1 °C | 34 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 25 Aug | 29.1 °C | 34 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 26 Aug | 29.3 °C | 37 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 27 Aug | 27.4 °C | 40 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 28 Aug | 26.3 °C | 37 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 29 Aug | 28.2 °C | 32 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 30 Aug | 29.6 °C | 26 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 31 Aug | 29.8 °C | 25 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 1 Sept | 29.8 °C | 28 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 2 Sept | 29.3 °C | 31 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 3 Sept | 29.9 °C | 31 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 4 Sept after | 30.5 °C | 30 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 5 Sept after | 29.1 °C | 36 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 6 Sept after | 29.7 °C | 36 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 7 Sept after | 29.2 °C | 36 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 8 Sept after | 27.0 °C | 36 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 9 Sept after | 25.3 °C | 41 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 10 Sept after | 28.1 °C | 34 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 11 Sept after | 29.4 °C | 30 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 12 Sept after | 30.8 °C | 26 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 13 Sept after | 30.1 °C | 29 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 5 September 2026 the air beside the fire reached 71 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 42: 2.8 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 574Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 6,692 haChitamboJuly 2024 · 16 days · 2 km away
- 8,084 haLavushimanda23 August 2017 · 13 days · 39 km away
- 7,224 haChitambo1 August 2024 · 16 days · 39 km away
- 5,979 haLavushimanda16 August 2026 · 27 days · 39 km away
- 12,058 haSerenjeAugust 2024 · 14 days · 40 km away
- 6,408 haLavushimanda26 August 2023 · 4 days · 40 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Chitambo fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026 (37 days). The perimeter dates it from 31 July 2026 to 31 August 2026.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 19,155 hectares (191.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Chitambo (19,230 ha, 1.6 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 29.9 °C, humidity dropped to 24 % and gusts hit 48 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 41, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Zambia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.