Champotón fire, 1 April 2023 Champotón
The fire started on 1 April 2023 in Champotón, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 16 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,519 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 10th largest in Campeche since 2016 (of 138 with a page). Number 37 in Mexico in 2023, of 286.
- Burnt area
- 5,519ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 16days
- 1 Apr 2023 – 16 Apr 2023
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- municipalities
- Started on
- 1 Apr
- 2023
- Heat detections
- 438
- in a single hotspot: 106 MW
- Danger at start
- 37
- High · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 207MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 9 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.2 mm on 29 Apr.
This area had burned before
2% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 107 ha in 2017.
What happened to each town
-
5,545 ha0.8 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Mar | 37.2 °C | 23 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 30 Mar | 37.2 °C | 27 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 31 Mar | 37.1 °C | 32 % | 52 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 1 Apr | 38.1 °C | 29 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 2 Apr | 37.7 °C | 30 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 3 Apr | 39.9 °C | 25 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 4 Apr | 40.5 °C | 24 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 5 Apr | 40.4 °C | 27 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 6 Apr | 39.7 °C | 28 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 7 Apr | 37.9 °C | 29 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 8 Apr | 37.3 °C | 24 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 9 Apr | 37.4 °C | 25 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 10 Apr | 36.5 °C | 30 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 11 Apr | 35.6 °C | 33 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 12 Apr | 33.6 °C | 33 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 13 Apr | 36.1 °C | 30 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 14 Apr | 40.3 °C | 22 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 15 Apr | 41.3 °C | 22 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 16 Apr | 39.3 °C | 27 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 17 Apr after | 33.8 °C | 35 % | 35 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 36 |
| 18 Apr after | 36.4 °C | 31 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 19 Apr after | 38.1 °C | 28 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 20 Apr after | 39.4 °C | 27 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 21 Apr after | 39.7 °C | 25 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 22 Apr after | 38.6 °C | 32 % | 37 km/h | 0.1 mm | Very high 40 |
| 23 Apr after | 40.7 °C | 25 % | 42 km/h | 0.1 mm | Very high 47 |
| 24 Apr after | 35.9 °C | 34 % | 38 km/h | 0.2 mm | Very high 42 |
| 25 Apr after | 37.3 °C | 36 % | 31 km/h | 0.3 mm | High 35 |
| 26 Apr after | 40.4 °C | 24 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 27 Apr after | 41.1 °C | 25 % | 41 km/h | 0.5 mm | Very high 45 |
| 28 Apr after | 38.9 °C | 36 % | 34 km/h | 0.1 mm | Very high 42 |
| 29 Apr after | 38.8 °C | 36 % | 50 km/h | 1.2 mm | Very high 40 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 9 April 2023 the air beside the fire reached 76 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 34: 2.3 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 438Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 5,097 haChampotón19 March 2017 · 17 days · 18 km away
- 10,263 haChampotón21 March 2023 · 27 days · 23 km away
- 3,115 haChampotón25 March 2023 · 18 days · 25 km away
- 3,371 haChampotónMarch 2020 · 24 days · 26 km away
- 4,570 haChampotónFebruary 2020 · 19 days · 27 km away
- 4,016 haChampotónMarch 2021 · 20 days · 27 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Champotón fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 1 April 2023 and 16 April 2023: 16 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,519 hectares (55.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Champotón (5,545 ha, 0.8 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 41.3 °C, humidity dropped to 22 % and gusts hit 54 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 54, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 911
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 438 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.