Caungula fire, 18 July 2026 Caungula, Lubalo
The fire started on 18 July 2026 in Caungula, Angola, and satellites saw it burning for 47 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 34,398 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
This page is probably a fire complex, not a single fire. GWIS merges into one perimeter the fires that touch over weeks, which in large burning seasons can join dozens of separate fires. The total area is reliable; the origin and dates refer to the whole complex.
Other fire pages in the same area and on the same dates:
- 143,587 haLubalo16 July 2026 · 52 days
- 16,569 haCaungula22 July 2026 · 30 days
- 15,324 haCaungula24 July 2026 · 29 days
- 14,058 haLubalo23 July 2026 · 25 days
- 13,455 haCuangoJuly 2026 · 31 days
- 8,878 haCaungula22 July 2026 · 18 days
- 7,344 haCaungula23 July 2026 · 29 days
- 5,727 haCaungula17 August 2026 · 7 days
It is the 11th largest in Lunda Norte since 2016 (of 411 with a page). Number 28 in Angola in 2026, of 487.
Compare with…
- Burnt area
- 34,398ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 47days
- 18 Jul 2026 – 2 Sept 2026
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- municipalities
- Started on
- 18 Jul
- 2026
- Heat detections
- 1,367
- in a single hotspot: 267 MW
- Danger at start
- 40
- Very high · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 529MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 22.3 mm on 3 Sept.
This area had burned before
96% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 15,473 ha in 2016, 15,976 ha in 2017, 4,646 ha in 2018, 17,074 ha in 2019, 16,902 ha in 2020, 6,675 ha in 2021, 8,247 ha in 2022, 12,642 ha in 2023, 8,550 ha in 2024, 12,405 ha in 2025. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 33,126 ha that had burned before.
- 7,104 ha Lubalo fire, July 2019 12,907 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 3,530 ha Caungula fire, July 2019 6,504 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,488 ha Caungula fire, July 2022 5,753 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,165 ha Lubalo fire, July 2023 7,178 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 243 ha Caungula fire, July 2020 6,193 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 161 ha Caungula fire, August 2016 7,689 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 4 ha Lubalo fire, July 2019 21,376 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Caungula where it started21,206 ha reached on 18 Jul1.9 %
-
13,409 ha reached on 18 Jul0.9 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2025Inside the perimeter there were about 1.1 hectares of built-up land and about 200 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Jul | 29.2 °C | 19 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 19 Jul | 29.8 °C | 22 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 20 Jul | 28.2 °C | 32 % | 21 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 21 Jul | 30.0 °C | 33 % | 19 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 22 Jul | 32.5 °C | 17 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 23 Jul | 32.5 °C | 15 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 24 Jul | 31.8 °C | 23 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 25 Jul | 30.9 °C | 25 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 26 Jul | 30.8 °C | 26 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 27 Jul | 30.7 °C | 29 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 28 Jul | 30.6 °C | 23 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 29 Jul | 30.6 °C | 21 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 30 Jul | 28.9 °C | 27 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 31 Jul | 30.4 °C | 24 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 1 Aug | 30.8 °C | 22 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 2 Aug | 31.1 °C | 20 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 3 Aug | 29.8 °C | 23 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 4 Aug | 30.3 °C | 27 % | 17 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 5 Aug | 31.1 °C | 21 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 6 Aug | 32.1 °C | 16 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 7 Aug | 31.4 °C | 20 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 8 Aug | 31.2 °C | 24 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 9 Aug | 30.5 °C | 27 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 10 Aug | 31.2 °C | 28 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 11 Aug | 30.3 °C | 32 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 12 Aug | 33.3 °C | 15 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 13 Aug | 31.7 °C | 27 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 14 Aug | 31.9 °C | 29 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 15 Aug | 32.0 °C | 28 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 16 Aug | 31.1 °C | 26 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 17 Aug | 32.4 °C | 18 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 18 Aug | 32.7 °C | 14 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 19 Aug | 32.3 °C | 16 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 20 Aug | 30.9 °C | 19 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 21 Aug | 30.0 °C | 26 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 22 Aug | 31.6 °C | 31 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 23 Aug | 32.8 °C | 24 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 24 Aug | 33.0 °C | 24 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 25 Aug | 32.0 °C | 31 % | 17 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 26 Aug | 29.7 °C | 42 % | 30 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 31 |
| 27 Aug | 33.8 °C | 27 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 28 Aug | 31.9 °C | 30 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 29 Aug | 31.7 °C | 30 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 30 Aug | 31.0 °C | 36 % | 32 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 32 |
| 31 Aug | 30.9 °C | 36 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 1 Sept | 31.6 °C | 40 % | 32 km/h | 0.9 mm | High 22 |
| 2 Sept | 33.4 °C | 30 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 3 Sept after | 31.2 °C | 43 % | 33 km/h | 22.3 mm | Very low 5 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 8 August 2026 the air beside the fire reached 174 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 108: 7.2 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 1,367Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 12,907 haLubalo17 July 2019 · 17 days · 13 km away
- 21,376 haLubalo10 July 2019 · 24 days · 31 km away
- 16,569 haCaungula22 July 2026 · 30 days · 31 km away
- 16,128 haCaungula12 July 2019 · 23 days · 33 km away
- 143,587 haLubalo16 July 2026 · 52 days · 37 km away
- 15,324 haCaungula24 July 2026 · 29 days · 38 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Caungula fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 18 July 2026 to 2 September 2026 (47 days). The perimeter dates it from 23 July 2026 to 27 August 2026.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 34,398 hectares (344.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Caungula (21,206 ha, 1.9 %); Lubalo (13,409 ha, 0.9 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 33.8 °C, humidity dropped to 14 % and gusts hit 45 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 50, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Angola (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 3 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 23 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. 1,367 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.