The fire started on 15 January 2019 in Casamaccioli, France, and satellites saw it burning for 2 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 129 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 23th largest in Haute-Corse since 2016 (of 27 with a page). Number 22 in France in 2019, of 26.
The power measured by the satellite is low (16.4 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Burned area
matches the official record
129ha
Perimeter published by EFFIS (Copernicus).
This page129BDIFF106
Source
EFFIS (Copernicus)
Date
perimeter revised on 2 March 2022
+− cross-check
BDIFF: 106 ha (matched records: 1). Difference between the page and the official record: +21.5%. Matched on 1 November 2026.
Duration by satellite
satellite only
2days
15 Jan 2019 to 16 Jan 2019: first and last day with fire on the page.
Source
EFFIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
Date
last detection: 16 Jan 2019, 11:29 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
matches the official record
14 Jan 201920:15
Alert according to BDIFF: 14 January 2019 at 20:15.
Source
BDIFF · 2019-6164
Date
matched to the page on 1 November 2026
+− cross-check
First day with fire on the page (satellite or perimeter): 15 January 2019.
Hotspots
satellite only
24
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 16 MW.
Source
NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP)
Date
15 Jan 2019 – 16 Jan 2019
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only
113MW
Total radiative power on 15 January 2019; hotspots that day: 19.
Source
NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
Date
15 Jan 2019
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model
1.8FWI · very low
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 26.
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings ›
Weather during the fire
model
5.2°C · 25% RH
High of 5.2 °C and minimum humidity of 25% on 15 January 2019; gusts of 41 km/h on 15 January 2019.
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
ⓘThis page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
· reconstructedweather
Weather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
· reconstructedofficial
Matched with the official BDIFF record
Matches: 106 ha in the official record (records: 1).
A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
5°high
41km/h · peak gust
25%lowest humidity
It had gone 26 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.0 mm on 17 Jan.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
What happened to each town
Casamaccioli115 inhabitants · 2.5 km from the centrewhere it started
129 hareached on 15 Jan
3.5 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
What burned
Other natural land100 %
Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.
Official record
According to BDIFF, a fire of 106 ha was recorded in Casamaccioli on 14 January 2019 (the satellite measured 129 ha). The record has no coordinates, so it was matched by municipality and date.
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Day
High
Min. humidity
Peak gust
Rain
Danger (FWI)
15 Jan
5.2 °C
25 %
41 km/h
0.0 mm
Very low 2
16 Jan
3.9 °C
48 %
35 km/h
0.0 mm
Very low 2
17 Jan after
2.9 °C
69 %
36 km/h
1.0 mm
Very low 2
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 1.8, a minimum humidity of 25% and 26 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 7.
FWI at the start1.8
Minimum humidity25 %
Days without rain26
this firechosen twinsrest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Casamaccioli fire, January 2019
129 ha2 daysFWI 1.8Min. humidity 25 %
Tende fire, January 2022
108 ha1 dayFWI 3.5Min. humidity 22 %235 km away, in 2022
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Fires in the area that started in similar weather: 7. With fewer than 15 we give no figures: they would be more noise than signal.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
1.0 mmfirst rain
17 Janthe day after it ended
41km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 16 Jan, and on 17 Jan 1.0 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 8 Jan 2019
After · 23 Jan 2019
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · Copernicus
On 15 January 2019 the air beside the fire reached 16 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but no daily average passed the WHO guideline (15).
PM2.5 peak16µg/m³
Days over the guideline0days
PM1028µg/m³
WHO 15
13 Jan15 Jan17 Jan19 Jan
GoodFairModeratePoorVery poorExtremely poor
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table· 24Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.›
⬇ Download CSVTimes in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Copernicus dates it between 15 January 2019 and 16 January 2019: 2 days between the first and last image with fire.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 129 hectares (1.3 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Casamaccioli (129 ha, 3.5 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire started in Casamaccioli and came within 2.5 km of its centre. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 5.2 °C, humidity dropped to 25 % and gusts hit 41 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 2, class Very low.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of France (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
⚑Report an errorHow we know this›
Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 24 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
Compared with BDIFF: 106 official ha against 129 ha of perimeter; they agree within 25%.
Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM5 (Open Data Commons Attribution License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.