Burned area
satellite only6,201ha
Perimeter published by GWIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 3 Sept 2020 – 7 Sept 2020
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
BR · Brazil · –
Babaçulândia fire, September 2020 Darcinópolis, Babaçulândia, Wanderlândia
Out · last detection 7 Sept 2020, 17:09 UTC
The fire started on 3 September 2020 in Babaçulândia, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 5 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 6,201 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.
It is the 365th largest in Tocantins since 2016 (of 1036 with a page). Number 387 in Brazil in 2020, of 957.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-24matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only5days
3 Sept 2020 to 7 Sept 2020: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 7 Sept 2020, 17:09 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only3 Sept 2020
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 3 Sept 2020
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Hotspots
satellite only187
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 219 MW.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP)
- Date
- 3 Sept 2020 – 7 Sept 2020
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only1,366MW
Total radiative power on 5 September 2020; hotspots that day: 59.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 5 Sept 2020
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model57.8FWI · extreme
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 60.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 3 Sept 2020, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model35.8°C · 22% RH
High of 35.8 °C and minimum humidity of 22% on 5 September 2020; gusts of 41 km/h on 3 September 2020.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 3 Sept 2020 – 7 Sept 2020
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
What was saved on 24 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 6,201 ha
- Dates
- 3 Sept 2020 – 7 Sept 2020
- Name
- Babaçulândia
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/babaculandia-2020-09?v=2026-10-24A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire babaculandia-2020-09.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-03 | 21 | 145 | 35.1 | 18.2 | 18 | 18.4 | 41.4 | 0 | 57.8 | extremo | 1 |
| 2020-09-04 | 24 | 577 | 34.6 | 17 | 22 | 17 | 39.2 | 0 | 56.7 | extremo | 1 |
| 2020-09-05 | 59 | 1,366 | 35.8 | 19.1 | 22 | 15.9 | 36 | 0 | 57.2 | extremo | 1 |
| 2020-09-06 | 75 | 739 | 35.2 | 21.4 | 23 | 17.4 | 37.8 | 0 | 52.3 | extremo | 1 |
| 2020-09-07 | 8 | 26 | 34.6 | 17.2 | 25 | 17.4 | 38.9 | 0 | 54.5 | extremo | 1 |
| 2020-09-08 | 0 | 0 | 35.6 | 19 | 24 | 16.1 | 37.8 | 0 | 56.1 | extremo | 0 |
| 2020-09-09 | 0 | 0 | 35.8 | 21.2 | 25 | 16.7 | 37.4 | 0 | 57.4 | extremo | 0 |
| 2020-09-10 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 22.2 | 21 | 15.7 | 36.4 | 0 | 56.9 | extremo | 0 |
| 2020-09-11 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 18.6 | 23 | 13.3 | 32.8 | 0 | 50.2 | extremo | 0 |
| 2020-09-12 | 0 | 0 | 36.1 | 21.3 | 20 | 14.4 | 33.8 | 0 | 52.9 | extremo | 0 |
| 2020-09-13 | 0 | 0 | 34.8 | 18.2 | 23 | 19 | 41.4 | 0 | 59 | extremo | 0 |
| 2020-09-14 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 18.8 | 24 | 15.8 | 35.3 | 0 | 55.3 | extremo | 0 |
| 2020-09-15 | 0 | 0 | 35.4 | 21.8 | 19 | 20.5 | 42.8 | 0 | 65.1 | extremo | 0 |
| 2020-09-16 | 0 | 0 | 36.2 | 20.1 | 22 | 17.8 | 39.2 | 0 | 62.4 | extremo | 0 |
| 2020-09-17 | 0 | 0 | 36.6 | 19 | 25 | 14.1 | 34.2 | 0 | 55.4 | extremo | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 6,201ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 5days
- 3 Sept 2020 – 7 Sept 2020
- Municipalities hit
- 3
- municipalities
- Started on
- 3 Sept
- 2020
- Heat detections
- 187
- in a single hotspot: 219 MW
- Danger at start
- 58
- Extreme · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 570MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
3 Sept7 Sept
7 Sept 2020
How it evolved, day by day
3 Sept
4 Sept
5 Sept
6 Sept
7 Sept
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
36°high
41km/h · peak gust
18%lowest humidity
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
24% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,097 ha in 2016, 741 ha in 2017. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 1,482 ha that had burned before.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Darcinópolis 5,827 inhabitants4,481 ha reached on 4 Sept2.7 %
-
1,666 ha reached on 3 Sept0.9 %
-
Wanderlândia 10,522 inhabitants95 ha0.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Built-up area0.40 ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there were about 0.40 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Started with Extreme FWI: 46 % of the area in Brazil 60 days without rain: 55 % of the area in Brazil
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept | 35.1 °C | 18 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 4 Sept | 34.6 °C | 22 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 5 Sept | 35.8 °C | 22 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 6 Sept | 35.2 °C | 23 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 7 Sept | 34.6 °C | 25 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 8 Sept after | 35.6 °C | 24 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 9 Sept after | 35.8 °C | 25 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 10 Sept after | 36.0 °C | 21 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 11 Sept after | 36.0 °C | 23 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 12 Sept after | 36.1 °C | 20 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 13 Sept after | 34.8 °C | 23 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 14 Sept after | 35.0 °C | 24 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 15 Sept after | 35.4 °C | 19 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 65 |
| 16 Sept after | 36.2 °C | 22 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 62 |
| 17 Sept after | 36.6 °C | 25 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 57.8, a minimum humidity of 18% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 28.
FWI at the start
57.8
Minimum humidity
18 %
Days without rain
60+
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Babaçulândia fire, September 2020
6,201 ha
5 days
FWI 57.8
Min. humidity 18 %
Tupiratins fire, August 2025
5,914 ha
15 days
FWI 57.0
Min. humidity 18 %
176 km away, in 2025
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Babaçulândia fire, September 2024
11,398 ha
23 days
FWI 60.1
Min. humidity 20 %
20 km away, in 2024
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 3.6 mm on 30 Sept.
Araguaína fire, August 2023
7,077 ha
5 days
FWI 59.2
Min. humidity 20 %
68 km away, in 2023
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Balsas fire, August 2025
3,883 ha
10 days
FWI 55.8
Min. humidity 18 %
184 km away, in 2025
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Goiatins fire, August 2023
4,159 ha
10 days
FWI 59.1
Min. humidity 20 %
128 km away, in 2023
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 5.4 mm on 29 Aug.
What happened to them
- 10 days
- median duration
- 4,021 ha
- median area
- 11 %
- went past 10,000 ha
- 4.4 mm
- rain at the end (median; 8 of 28 had it)
It was 1.5 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 5 days, against 10 days.
Only 6 of its 28 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 20 of 28, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 4.4 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
—first rain
—no rain in ten days
41km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 7 Sept, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 8 of 28, with a median of 4.4 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 27 Aug 2020
After · 14 Sept 2020
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 187Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 7,896 haWanderlândiaSeptember 2025 · 13 days · 16 km away
- 5,675 haWanderlândiaAugust 2022 · 13 days · 19 km away
- 11,398 haBabaçulândiaSeptember 2024 · 23 days · 20 km away
- 5,989 haDarcinópolisAugust 2024 · 11 days · 25 km away
- 6,358 haDarcinópolisSeptember 2017 · 12 days · 26 km away
- 5,326 haCarolina29 August 2024 · 9 days · 35 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Babaçulândia fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 3 September 2020 and 7 September 2020: 5 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 6,201 hectares (62.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 3 municipalities: Darcinópolis (4,481 ha, 2.7 %); Babaçulândia (1,666 ha, 0.9 %); Wanderlândia (95 ha, 0.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 35.8 °C, humidity dropped to 18 % and gusts hit 41 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 58, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 28. Their median duration was 10 days and their median area 4,021 ha; 11 % went past 10,000 ha. Only 6 of its 28 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 20 of 28, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 4.4 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 193 · Emergency number and official warnings
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 187 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.