Skip to content
worldfires
BR · Brazil · –

Araguacema fire, September 2025 Araguacema, Caseara

Out · last detection 17 Sept 2025, 16:47 UTC

The fire started on 5 September 2025 in Araguacema, Brazil, and satellites saw it burning for 14 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 7,781 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 262th largest in Tocantins since 2016 (of 1036 with a page). Number 147 in Brazil in 2025, of 526.

Burnt area
7,781ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
14days
5 Sept 2025 – 18 Sept 2025
Municipalities hit
2
municipalities
Started on
5 Sept
2025
Heat detections
307
in a single hotspot: 128 MW
Danger at start
55
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
384MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 5 Sept18 Sept
17 Sept 2025

How it evolved, day by day

5 Sept 2025 · 230 MW · 4 6 Sept 2025 · 112 MW · 10 7 Sept 2025 · 277 MW · 11 8 Sept 2025 · 67 MW · 8 9 Sept 2025 · 239 MW · 15 10 Sept 2025 · 2,200 MW · 141 11 Sept 2025 · 1,107 MW · 80 12 Sept 2025 · 290 MW · 24 14 Sept 2025 · 4 MW · 1 15 Sept 2025 · 16 MW · 4 16 Sept 2025 · 52 MW · 6 17 Sept 2025 · 13 MW · 3
5 Sept 10 Sept 15 Sept

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

39°high
37km/h · peak gust
18%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.5 mm on 20 Sept.

This area had burned before

61% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 2,059 ha in 2017, 2,283 ha in 2020, 1,674 ha in 2023. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 4,712 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 4.9% of the area of London (78 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Araguacema 5,927 inhabitants where it started
    5,819 ha reached on 5 Sept
    2.1 %
  2. Caseara 4,847 inhabitants
    2,013 ha reached on 10 Sept
    1.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area0.22 ha
Residents≈ 30

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.22 hectares of built-up land and about 30 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Extreme FWI: 46 % of the area in Brazil 60 days without rain: 55 % of the area in Brazil

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
5 Sept 37.3 °C 25 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
6 Sept 37.7 °C 20 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
7 Sept 38.4 °C 23 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
8 Sept 36.5 °C 29 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
9 Sept 37.4 °C 18 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
10 Sept 38.8 °C 18 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
11 Sept 39.3 °C 22 % 21 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
12 Sept 37.0 °C 32 % 31 km/h 0.2 mm Extreme 51
13 Sept 35.5 °C 41 % 32 km/h 0.3 mm Very high 40
14 Sept 35.6 °C 41 % 27 km/h 0.2 mm High 36
15 Sept 35.7 °C 35 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
16 Sept 35.2 °C 37 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
17 Sept 35.8 °C 38 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
18 Sept 34.4 °C 42 % 26 km/h 0.2 mm High 33
19 Sept after 33.0 °C 51 % 22 km/h 0.3 mm High 25
20 Sept after 33.7 °C 44 % 22 km/h 1.5 mm Moderate 15

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 55.2, a minimum humidity of 25% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 17.

FWI at the start 55.2
Minimum humidity 25 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Santa Terezinha fire, August 2016
5,126 ha 16 days FWI 55.1 Min. humidity 25 % 121 km away, in 2016

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.2 mm on 17 Sept.

What happened to them

12 days
median duration
5,927 ha
median area
24 %
went past 10,000 ha
2.3 mm
rain at the end (median; 6 of 17 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (7,781 ha against a median of 5,927 ha) and lasted 14 days, against 12 days.

In 11 of 17, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.3 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

1.5 mmfirst rain
20 Sept2 days after it ended
37km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 18 Sept, and on 20 Sept 1.5 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 6 of 17, with a median of 2.3 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 29 Aug 2025
After · 25 Sept 2025

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 11 September 2025 the air beside the fire reached 83 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 49: 3.3 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak83 µg/m³
Days over the guideline8 days
PM1084 µg/m³
Optical depth0.78
30 Aug4 Sept9 Sept14 Sept19 Sept
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 307Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Brazil

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Araguacema fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 5 September 2025 and 18 September 2025: 14 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 7,781 hectares (77.8 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Araguacema (5,819 ha, 2.1 %); Caseara (2,013 ha, 1.2 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 39.3 °C, humidity dropped to 18 % and gusts hit 37 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 58, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Brazil (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 17. Their median duration was 12 days and their median area 5,927 ha; 24 % went past 10,000 ha. In 11 of 17, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.3 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 193 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 193.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 307 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.