Skip to content
worldfires
CN · China · –

Anda City fire, 7 April 2024 安达市 · Anda City

Out · last measured on 10 Apr 2024

The fire started on 7 April 2024 in Anda City, China, and satellites saw it burning for 4 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,075 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 234th largest in Heilongjiang Province since 2016 (of 943 with a page). Number 48 in China in 2024, of 235.

We have the GWIS perimeter for this fire, but the VIIRS sensors did not capture it in enough detail: no day-by-day evolution, but the split by municipality is there.

Burnt area
2,075ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
4days
7 Apr 2024 – 10 Apr 2024
Municipalities hit
1
counties
Started on
7 Apr
2024
Danger at start
15
Moderate · FWI index

Where it burned

The weather it burned in

16°high
61km/h · peak gust
15%lowest humidity

It had gone 10 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 9.6 mm on 15 Apr.

This area had burned before

54% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 241 ha in 2020, 1,052 ha in 2022. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 1,129 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.3% of the area of London (21 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Anda City 安达市 where it started
    2,070 ha
    0.6 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area28 ha
Residents≈ 1,800

Inside the perimeter there were about 28 hectares of built-up land and about 1,800 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Strong wind: 24 % of the area in China

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
7 Apr 10.9 °C 21 % 61 km/h 0.1 mm Moderate 15
8 Apr 2.9 °C 27 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Low 10
9 Apr 9.9 °C 22 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Low 8
10 Apr 15.6 °C 15 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 13
11 Apr after 19.4 °C 38 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 12
12 Apr after 21.1 °C 38 % 64 km/h 0.2 mm Moderate 18
13 Apr after 23.9 °C 40 % 42 km/h 0.3 mm Moderate 15
14 Apr after 22.8 °C 42 % 62 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
15 Apr after 16.3 °C 59 % 46 km/h 9.6 mm Very low 0

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 15.2, a minimum humidity of 21% and 10 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 23.

FWI at the start 15.2
Minimum humidity 21 %
Days without rain 10
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Qinggang County fire, April 2020
2,419 ha 2 days FWI 15.7 Min. humidity 21 % 44 km away, in 2020

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 5.7 mm on 10 May.

What happened to them

3 days
median duration
1,694 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
3.7 mm
rain at the end (median; 23 of 23 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (2,075 ha against a median of 1,694 ha) and lasted 4 days, against 3 days.

All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 3.7 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

9.6 mmfirst rain
15 Apr5 days after it ended
61km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 10 Apr, and on 15 Apr 9.6 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 23 of 23, with a median of 3.7 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 31 Mar 2024
After · 17 Apr 2024

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 10 April 2024 the air beside the fire reached 77 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 58: 3.9 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak77 µg/m³
Days over the guideline6 days
PM10131 µg/m³
Optical depth1.21
5 Apr7 Apr9 Apr11 Apr13 Apr
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Other fires nearby

All fires in China

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Anda City fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 7 April 2024 and 10 April 2024: 4 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,075 hectares (20.8 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Anda City (2,070 ha, 0.6 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 15.6 °C, humidity dropped to 15 % and gusts hit 61 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 15, class Moderate.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of China (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 23. Their median duration was 3 days and their median area 1,694 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 3.7 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 119 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 119.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.