Skip to content
worldfires
IQ · Iraq · –

Al-Kahla fire, May 2022 Al-Kahla

Out · last detection 25 Jun 2022, 08:54 UTC

The fire started on 29 May 2022 in Al-Kahla, Iraq, and satellites saw it burning for 35 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 8,615 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 2th largest in Maysan since 2016 (of 29 with a page). The largest in Iraq in 2022, of 12.

Burnt area
8,615ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
35days
29 May 2022 – 2 Jul 2022
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
29 May
2022
Heat detections
181
in a single hotspot: 153 MW
Danger at start
68
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
436MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 29 May2 Jul
25 Jun 2022

How it evolved, day by day

31 May 2022 · 20 MW · 1 12 Jun 2022 · 234 MW · 9 14 Jun 2022 · 2,124 MW · 46 15 Jun 2022 · 441 MW · 20 16 Jun 2022 · 565 MW · 28 17 Jun 2022 · 126 MW · 15 18 Jun 2022 · 545 MW · 28 19 Jun 2022 · 137 MW · 10 20 Jun 2022 · 3 MW · 2 21 Jun 2022 · 558 MW · 19 25 Jun 2022 · 45 MW · 3
14 Jun 18 Jun 21 Jun

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

50°high
70km/h · peak gust
5%lowest humidity

It had gone 28 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

98% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 2,574 ha in 2016, 94 ha in 2017, 5,767 ha in 2018, 237 ha in 2020, 8,976 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 8,452 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 5.4% of the area of London (86 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Al-Kahla where it started
    8,997 ha reached on 31 May
    2.5 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Very dry air: 69 % of the area in Iraq

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
29 May 42.7 °C 7 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 68
30 May 44.5 °C 8 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 74
31 May 45.7 °C 8 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
1 Jun 46.4 °C 7 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 63
2 Jun 46.9 °C 7 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 64
3 Jun 48.1 °C 6 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 62
4 Jun 48.7 °C 7 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 64
5 Jun 49.3 °C 6 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 70
6 Jun 49.2 °C 8 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 67
7 Jun 50.2 °C 6 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66
8 Jun 49.4 °C 8 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 75
9 Jun 48.2 °C 8 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 92
10 Jun 45.0 °C 5 % 59 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 110
11 Jun 44.5 °C 8 % 59 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 110
12 Jun 45.5 °C 9 % 50 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 98
13 Jun 46.2 °C 9 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 74
14 Jun 45.5 °C 9 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 84
15 Jun 45.8 °C 9 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 87
16 Jun 45.8 °C 7 % 58 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 106
17 Jun 48.1 °C 6 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 93
18 Jun 49.9 °C 7 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 70
19 Jun 50.1 °C 8 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 67
20 Jun 49.7 °C 9 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 90
21 Jun 49.6 °C 7 % 65 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 118
22 Jun 45.8 °C 10 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 89
23 Jun 42.0 °C 14 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 72
24 Jun 44.0 °C 12 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 59
25 Jun 46.8 °C 9 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 60
26 Jun 43.3 °C 12 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 85
27 Jun 43.6 °C 10 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 82
28 Jun 45.7 °C 8 % 50 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 91
29 Jun 49.0 °C 6 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 84
30 Jun 50.0 °C 6 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 89
1 Jul 49.4 °C 7 % 58 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 109
2 Jul 46.5 °C 9 % 70 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 124
3 Jul after 45.2 °C 12 % 50 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 94
4 Jul after 46.3 °C 12 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 69
5 Jul after 47.1 °C 10 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 76
6 Jul after 47.2 °C 11 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 73
7 Jul after 47.0 °C 9 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 69
8 Jul after 47.4 °C 8 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 88
9 Jul after 46.5 °C 10 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 75
10 Jul after 48.3 °C 11 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 81
11 Jul after 45.9 °C 13 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 79
12 Jul after 45.6 °C 14 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 75

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 68.2, a minimum humidity of 7% and 28 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 25.

FWI at the start 68.2
Minimum humidity 7 %
Days without rain 28
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Andimeshk fire, June 2019
1,488 ha 2 days FWI 66.9 Min. humidity 8 % 134 km away, in 2019

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

5 days
median duration
1,411 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
1.7 mm
rain at the end (median; 3 of 25 had it)

It was 6.1 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 35 days, against 5 days.

None of its 25 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 22 of 25, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.7 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
70km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 2 Jul, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 3 of 25, with a median of 1.7 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 22 May 2022
After · 9 Jul 2022

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 181Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Iraq

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Al-Kahla fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 29 May 2022 and 2 July 2022: 35 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 8,615 hectares (86.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Al-Kahla (8,997 ha, 2.5 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 50.2 °C, humidity dropped to 5 % and gusts hit 70 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 124, class Very extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Iraq (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 25. Their median duration was 5 days and their median area 1,411 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. None of its 25 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 22 of 25, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.7 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Area: 9,182 → 8,615 ha.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 3 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 181 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.