Skip to content
worldfires
IQ · Iraq · –

Al-Chibayish fire, 9 August 2022 Al-Chibayish

Out · last detection 12 Aug 2022, 10:35 UTC

The fire started on 9 August 2022 in Al-Chibayish, Iraq, and satellites saw it burning for 4 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,085 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

Number 11 in Iraq in 2022, of 12.

Burnt area
1,085ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
4days
9 Aug 2022 – 12 Aug 2022
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
9 Aug
2022
Heat detections
79
in a single hotspot: 78 MW
Danger at start
167
Very extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
1.3GW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 9 Aug12 Aug
12 Aug 2022

How it evolved, day by day

11 Aug 2022 · 2,475 MW · 74 12 Aug 2022 · 96 MW · 5
11 Aug 12 Aug

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

49°high
69km/h · peak gust
9%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.7% of the area of London (11 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Al-Chibayish where it started
    1,089 ha reached on 11 Aug
    0.5 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Strong wind: 14 % of the area in Iraq Very dry air: 69 % of the area in Iraq 60 days without rain: 27 % of the area in Iraq

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
9 Aug 49.2 °C 9 % 69 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 167
10 Aug 49.0 °C 9 % 64 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 155
11 Aug 48.3 °C 11 % 68 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 167
12 Aug 48.2 °C 10 % 62 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 150
13 Aug after 47.8 °C 11 % 55 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 124
14 Aug after 47.3 °C 14 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 90
15 Aug after 48.2 °C 9 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 95
16 Aug after 48.5 °C 9 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 112
17 Aug after 47.7 °C 11 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 93
18 Aug after 49.0 °C 9 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 98
19 Aug after 48.7 °C 9 % 51 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 117
20 Aug after 49.4 °C 8 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 103
21 Aug after 48.6 °C 11 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 72
22 Aug after 45.7 °C 12 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 86

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 166.9, a minimum humidity of 9% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 1.

FWI at the start 166.9
Minimum humidity 9 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Dasht-e-Azadegan fire, July 2018
1,552 ha 1 day FWI 156.5 Min. humidity 7 % 133 km away, in 2018

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

Fires in the area that started in similar weather: 1. With fewer than 15 we give no figures: they would be more noise than signal.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
69km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 12 Aug, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 2 Aug 2022
After · 19 Aug 2022

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 11 August 2022 the air beside the fire reached 66 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 54: 3.6 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak66 µg/m³
Days over the guideline7 days
PM10398 µg/m³
Optical depth0.85
9 Aug11 Aug13 Aug15 Aug
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 79Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Iraq

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Al-Chibayish fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 9 August 2022 to 12 August 2022 (4 days). The perimeter dates it from 11 August 2022 to 12 August 2022.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,085 hectares (10.8 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Al-Chibayish (1,089 ha, 0.5 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 49.2 °C, humidity dropped to 9 % and gusts hit 69 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 167, class Very extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Iraq (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Start date: 11 August 2022 → 9 August 2022.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 11 August 2022 to 12 August 2022. 79 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.