Skip to content
worldfires
VE · Venezuela · –

Achaguas fire, 5 February 2020 Achaguas

Out · last detection 12 Feb 2020, 17:13 UTC

The fire started on 5 February 2020 in Achaguas, Venezuela, and satellites saw it burning for 13 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,568 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 150th largest in Apure since 2016 (of 761 with a page). Number 76 in Venezuela in 2020, of 401.

Burnt area
3,568ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
13days
5 Feb 2020 – 17 Feb 2020
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
5 Feb
2020
Heat detections
123
in a single hotspot: 64 MW
Danger at start
50
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
128MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 5 Feb17 Feb
12 Feb 2020

How it evolved, day by day

5 Feb 2020 · 242 MW · 22 6 Feb 2020 · 282 MW · 18 7 Feb 2020 · 220 MW · 28 8 Feb 2020 · 87 MW · 28 9 Feb 2020 · 135 MW · 18 10 Feb 2020 · 26 MW · 3 11 Feb 2020 · 15 MW · 1 12 Feb 2020 · 14 MW · 5
6 Feb 9 Feb 11 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

38°high
49km/h · peak gust
23%lowest humidity

It had gone 20 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2.3% of the area of London (36 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Achaguas 28,966 inhabitants where it started
    3,593 ha reached on 5 Feb
    0.3 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
5 Feb 37.2 °C 24 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
6 Feb 37.3 °C 24 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
7 Feb 37.2 °C 23 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
8 Feb 36.6 °C 24 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
9 Feb 36.3 °C 26 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
10 Feb 36.8 °C 25 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
11 Feb 37.1 °C 25 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
12 Feb 37.7 °C 26 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
13 Feb 37.4 °C 25 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
14 Feb 36.6 °C 30 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
15 Feb 36.5 °C 25 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
16 Feb 37.9 °C 25 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
17 Feb 37.0 °C 28 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
18 Feb after 37.2 °C 36 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
19 Feb after 39.2 °C 23 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
20 Feb after 38.4 °C 24 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
21 Feb after 37.6 °C 30 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
22 Feb after 38.5 °C 25 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
23 Feb after 37.7 °C 29 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
24 Feb after 37.9 °C 31 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
25 Feb after 37.4 °C 31 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
26 Feb after 37.6 °C 28 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
27 Feb after 38.5 °C 25 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 49.9, a minimum humidity of 24% and 20 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 56.

FWI at the start 49.9
Minimum humidity 24 %
Days without rain 20
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Achaguas fire, April 2023
4,349 ha 6 days FWI 47.9 Min. humidity 24 % 15 km away, in 2023

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 3.0 mm on 17 Apr.

What happened to them

7 days
median duration
2,198 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
3.1 mm
rain at the end (median; 30 of 56 had it)

It was 1.6 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 13 days, against 7 days.

Only 8 of its 56 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 26 of 56, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.1 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
49km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 17 Feb, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 30 of 56, with a median of 3.1 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 29 Jan 2020
After · 24 Feb 2020

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 123Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Venezuela

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Achaguas fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 5 February 2020 to 17 February 2020 (13 days). The perimeter dates it from 5 February 2020 to 11 February 2020.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,568 hectares (35.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Achaguas (3,593 ha, 0.3 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 37.9 °C, humidity dropped to 23 % and gusts hit 49 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 53, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Venezuela (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 56. Their median duration was 7 days and their median area 2,198 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 8 of its 56 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 26 of 56, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.1 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 911 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 11 February 2020 → 17 February 2020.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 911.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 5 February 2020 to 11 February 2020. 123 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.