Skip to content
worldfires
en
KG · Kyrgyzstan

Districts that have burned most often in Kyrgyzstan

Districts of Kyrgyzstan with at least one fire larger than 300 hectares with a perimeter since 2016: 10. With two or more: 4. Top of the list is Toktogul, which has burned 3 times in 3 years, with 1,581 hectares burned inside its boundaries.

By number of fires

  1. 1ToktogulJalal-Abad Region3×3 years · 1,581 ha
  2. 2UzgenOsh Region3×3 years · 1,467 ha
  3. 3Toguz-ToroNaryn Region2×2 years · 760 ha
  4. 4PanfilovChuy Region2×1 year · 680 ha
  5. 5MoskvaChuy Region1×1 year · 1,804 ha
  6. 6Kara-KuljaOsh Region1×1 year · 1,193 ha
  7. 7BatkenBatken Region1×1 year · 668 ha
  8. 8SokulukChuy Region1×1 year · 524 ha
  9. 9Ysyk-AtaChuy Region1×1 year · 346 ha
  10. 10JayylChuy Region1×1 year · 32 ha

By hectares burned

  1. 1MoskvaChuy Region1,804 ha1× · 1.2 %
  2. 2ToktogulJalal-Abad Region1,581 ha3× · 0.2 %
  3. 3UzgenOsh Region1,467 ha3× · 0.4 %
  4. 4Kara-KuljaOsh Region1,193 ha1× · 0.2 %
  5. 5Toguz-ToroNaryn Region760 ha2× · 0.2 %
  6. 6PanfilovChuy Region680 ha2× · 0.1 %
  7. 7BatkenBatken Region668 ha1× · 0.1 %
  8. 8SokulukChuy Region524 ha1× · 0.3 %
  9. 9Ysyk-AtaChuy Region346 ha1× · 0.2 %
  10. 10JayylChuy Region32 ha1× · 0.0 %

By share of the municipality (10 km² or more)

  1. 1MoskvaChuy Region1.2 %1,804 ha · 1,531 km²
  2. 2UzgenOsh Region0.4 %1,467 ha · 3,262 km²
  3. 3SokulukChuy Region0.3 %524 ha · 2,016 km²
  4. 4Kara-KuljaOsh Region0.2 %1,193 ha · 5,368 km²
  5. 5Toguz-ToroNaryn Region0.2 %760 ha · 4,047 km²
  6. 6Ysyk-AtaChuy Region0.2 %346 ha · 1,936 km²
  7. 7ToktogulJalal-Abad Region0.2 %1,581 ha · 8,963 km²
  8. 8PanfilovChuy Region0.1 %680 ha · 5,353 km²
  9. 9BatkenBatken Region0.1 %668 ha · 6,766 km²
  10. 10JayylChuy Region0.0 %32 ha · 1,619 km²

How it is calculated

We count fires larger than 300 hectares with a perimeter since 2016 that reached each municipality, even partly. Hectares are those burned inside the municipality and are added fire by fire, so land that burned twice counts twice; that is why the share, given only for municipalities of 10 km² or more, can exceed 100 % (it is then shown as a multiple). It describes what happened: it does not measure risk or say anything about causes.