Skip to content
worldfires
UA · Ukraine · –

Zviahel fire, September 2023 Звягель · Zviahel

Out · last detection 23 Sept 2023, 10:10 UTC

The fire started on 22 September 2023 in Zviahel, Ukraine, and satellites saw it burning for 4 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 494 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 47th largest in Zhytomyr Oblast since 2016 (of 179 with a page). Number 72 in Ukraine in 2023, of 491.

The power measured by the satellite is low (7.6 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
494ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
4days
22 Sept 2023 – 25 Sept 2023
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
22 Sept
2023
Heat detections
10
in a single hotspot: 8 MW
Danger at start
31
High · FWI index
Average daily power
18MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 22 Sept25 Sept
23 Sept 2023

How it evolved, day by day

22 Sept 2023 · 11 MW · 3 23 Sept 2023 · 25 MW · 7
22 Sept 23 Sept

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

27°high
44km/h · peak gust
33%lowest humidity

It had gone 2 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

What happened to each town

  1. Zviahel Звягель 55,086 inhabitants · 9.7 km from the centre where it started
    492 ha reached on 22 Sept
    0.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Mixed forest66 %
  • Other natural land19 %
  • Agricultural areas13 %
  • Broadleaved forest2.2 %

Land cover inside the perimeter as reported by Copernicus EFFIS (outside the Corine Land Cover area).

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
22 Sept 27.0 °C 33 % 44 km/h 0.2 mm High 31
23 Sept 27.2 °C 52 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
24 Sept 25.8 °C 58 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
25 Sept 23.5 °C 60 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
26 Sept after 23.2 °C 60 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
27 Sept after 24.4 °C 53 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
28 Sept after 24.8 °C 37 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
29 Sept after 26.3 °C 27 % 19 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
30 Sept after 26.1 °C 31 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
1 Oct after 18.1 °C 46 % 40 km/h 0.7 mm High 25
2 Oct after 17.8 °C 44 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
3 Oct after 22.1 °C 41 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
4 Oct after 19.0 °C 45 % 47 km/h 0.5 mm High 36
5 Oct after 17.9 °C 45 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm High 28

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 31.3, a minimum humidity of 33% and 2 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2020: 22.

FWI at the start 31.3
Minimum humidity 33 %
Days without rain 2
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Zviahel fire, May 2025
612 ha 4 days FWI 29.8 Min. humidity 29 % 2 km away, in 2025

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 4.0 mm on 10 May.

What happened to them

4 days
median duration
236 ha
median area
18 %
went past 1,000 ha
3.5 mm
rain at the end (median; 21 of 22 had it)

It was 2.1 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 4 days, against 4 days.

Only 8 of its 22 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 1 of 22, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.5 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
44km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 25 Sept, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 21 of 22, with a median of 3.5 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2020.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 15 Sept 2023
After · 2 Oct 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 28 September 2023 the air beside the fire reached 23 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 17: 1.1 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak23 µg/m³
Days over the guideline1 day
PM1033 µg/m³
Optical depth0.37
20 Sept23 Sept26 Sept29 Sept2 Oct
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 10Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Ukraine

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Zviahel fire last?
Copernicus dates it between 22 September 2023 and 25 September 2023: 4 days between the first and last image with fire.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 494 hectares (4.9 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Zviahel (492 ha, 0.2 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire started in Zviahel and came within 9.7 km of its centre. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 27.2 °C, humidity dropped to 33 % and gusts hit 44 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 31, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Ukraine (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2020 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 22. Their median duration was 4 days and their median area 236 ha; 18 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 8 of its 22 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 1 of 22, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.5 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 101 · 112 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 101 · 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 10 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.