Skip to content
worldfires
MX · Mexico · –

Zirándaro fire, February 2025 Zirándaro

Out · last detection 6 Mar 2025, 08:20 UTC

The fire started on 21 February 2025 in Zirándaro, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 14 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,122 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 90th largest in Guerrero since 2016 (of 582 with a page). Number 30 in Mexico in 2025, of 163.

The power measured by the satellite is low (21.5 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
5,122ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
14days
21 Feb 2025 – 6 Mar 2025
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
21 Feb
2025
Heat detections
218
in a single hotspot: 22 MW
Danger at start
15
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
52MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 21 Feb6 Mar
6 Mar 2025

How it evolved, day by day

22 Feb 2025 · 56 MW · 17 23 Feb 2025 · 66 MW · 25 24 Feb 2025 · 43 MW · 19 25 Feb 2025 · 24 MW · 8 26 Feb 2025 · 37 MW · 9 27 Feb 2025 · 72 MW · 19 28 Feb 2025 · 88 MW · 28 1 Mar 2025 · 30 MW · 20 2 Mar 2025 · 53 MW · 17 3 Mar 2025 · 33 MW · 15 4 Mar 2025 · 145 MW · 33 5 Mar 2025 · 33 MW · 7 6 Mar 2025 · 0 MW · 1
22 Feb 25 Feb 28 Feb 4 Mar

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

31°high
49km/h · peak gust
21%lowest humidity

It had gone 0 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

98% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 4,522 ha in 2016, 13 ha in 2017, 4,594 ha in 2019, 347 ha in 2020, 1,274 ha in 2022, 29 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 4,996 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 3.2% of the area of London (51 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Zirándaro where it started
    5,149 ha reached on 22 Feb
    2.4 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
21 Feb 30.0 °C 35 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 15
22 Feb 30.4 °C 36 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
23 Feb 30.3 °C 33 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
24 Feb 30.1 °C 31 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
25 Feb 28.0 °C 44 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
26 Feb 28.8 °C 40 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
27 Feb 30.0 °C 23 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
28 Feb 28.9 °C 31 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
1 Mar 29.2 °C 23 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
2 Mar 29.5 °C 26 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
3 Mar 30.7 °C 21 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
4 Mar 29.7 °C 23 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
5 Mar 29.3 °C 32 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
6 Mar 28.9 °C 29 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
7 Mar after 30.7 °C 22 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
8 Mar after 29.8 °C 24 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
9 Mar after 28.5 °C 38 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
10 Mar after 28.1 °C 42 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
11 Mar after 28.2 °C 39 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
12 Mar after 29.5 °C 23 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
13 Mar after 28.6 °C 26 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
14 Mar after 27.3 °C 34 % 50 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
15 Mar after 27.3 °C 39 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
16 Mar after 27.2 °C 41 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm High 31

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 14.6, a minimum humidity of 35% and rain the day before. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 22.

FWI at the start 14.6
Minimum humidity 35 %
Days without rain 0
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

San Miguel Totolapan fire, April 2016
2,265 ha 9 days FWI 15.7 Min. humidity 35 % 122 km away, in 2016

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.0 mm on 7 May.

What happened to them

12 days
median duration
3,142 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
2.0 mm
rain at the end (median; 20 of 22 had it)

It was 1.6 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 14 days, against 12 days.

Only 5 of its 22 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 2 of 22, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.0 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
49km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 6 Mar, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 20 of 22, with a median of 2.0 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 14 Feb 2025
After · 13 Mar 2025

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 23 February 2025 the air beside the fire reached 26 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 17: 1.1 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak26 µg/m³
Days over the guideline1 day
PM1026 µg/m³
Optical depth0.65
19 Feb23 Feb27 Feb3 Mar7 Mar
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 218Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Mexico

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Zirándaro fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 21 February 2025 to 6 March 2025 (14 days). The perimeter dates it from 21 February 2025 to 5 March 2025.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,122 hectares (51.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Zirándaro (5,149 ha, 2.4 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 30.7 °C, humidity dropped to 21 % and gusts hit 49 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 40, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 22. Their median duration was 12 days and their median area 3,142 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 5 of its 22 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 2 of 22, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.0 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 911 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 911.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 21 February 2025 to 5 March 2025. 218 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.