عين دراهم fire, August 2021 عين دراهم
The fire started on 10 August 2021 in عين دراهم, Tunisia, and satellites saw it burning for 3 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 631 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 4th largest in Jendouba since 2016 (of 32 with a page). Number 12 in Tunisia in 2021, of 37.
Compare with…
- Burnt area
- 631ha
- Copernicus perimeter
- Duration
- 3days
- 10 Aug 2021 – 12 Aug 2021
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- delegations
- Started on
- 10 Aug
- 2021
- Heat detections
- 54
- in a single hotspot: 170 MW
- Danger at start
- 52
- Extreme · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 792MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 51 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
55% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 344 ha in 2017, 6 ha in 2020.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
عين دراهم where it started560 ha reached on 10 Aug1.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
What burned
- Broadleaved forest85 %
- Agricultural areas10 %
- Scrub and transitional woodland4.3 %
- Other land cover0.6 %
Land cover inside the perimeter as reported by Copernicus EFFIS (outside the Corine Land Cover area).
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug | 41.6 °C | 16 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 11 Aug | 38.8 °C | 17 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 12 Aug | 37.2 °C | 21 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 13 Aug after | 35.8 °C | 29 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 14 Aug after | 31.9 °C | 43 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 15 Aug after | 33.3 °C | 38 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 16 Aug after | 35.3 °C | 31 % | 35 km/h | 0.6 mm | Very high 40 |
| 17 Aug after | 28.7 °C | 59 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 18 Aug after | 27.2 °C | 53 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 19 Aug after | 29.2 °C | 47 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 20 Aug after | 29.5 °C | 54 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 21 Aug after | 30.6 °C | 43 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 22 Aug after | 30.9 °C | 37 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 54Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 1,820 haSouarekh السوارخAugust 2022 · 1 day · 7 km away
- 2,599 haSouarekh السوارخJuly 2017 · 5 days · 8 km away
- 7,171 haBuqus بوقوس23 July 2017 · 13 days · 25 km away
- 6,415 haBouteldja بوثلجةAugust 2022 · 9 days · 26 km away
- 2,697 haBuqus بوقوسAugust 2021 · 4 days · 32 km away
- 6,376 haEl Tarf الطارف25 August 2026 · 4 days · 34 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the عين دراهم fire last?
- Copernicus dates it between 10 August 2021 and 12 August 2021: 3 days between the first and last image with fire.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 631 hectares (6.3 km²). Official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered عين دراهم (560 ha, 1.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 41.6 °C, humidity dropped to 16 % and gusts hit 38 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 52, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Tunisia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 198 · Emergency number and official warnings ›
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 54 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.