The fire started on 19 February 2025 in Vega de Pas, Spain, and satellites saw it burning for 5 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 1,745 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across 3 municipalities.
It is the 3th largest in Cantabria since 2016 (of 179 with a page). Number 34 in Spain in 2025, of 158.
The power measured by the satellite is low (21.0 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
Union of 2 EFFIS (Copernicus) perimeters: overlapping areas count once.
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
19 Feb 2025 to 23 Feb 2025: first and last day with fire on the page.
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 21 MW.
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
Total radiative power on 19 February 2025; hotspots that day: 36.
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 5.
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
High of 14.8 °C and minimum humidity of 56% on 20 February 2025; gusts of 66 km/h on 21 February 2025.
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-19 | 36 | 202 | 13.7 | 5.6 | 57 | 11 | 26.6 | 0 | 0.6 | muy_bajo | 1 |
| 2025-02-20 | 0 | 0 | 14.8 | 6.1 | 56 | 14.2 | 40 | 0 | 1.6 | muy_bajo | 1 |
| 2025-02-21 | 0 | 0 | 14.3 | 8.2 | 47 | 24.8 | 65.5 | 3 | 4 | muy_bajo | 1 |
| 2025-02-22 | 0 | 0 | 9.5 | 4.5 | 71 | 9.5 | 27.4 | 12.7 | 0 | muy_bajo | 1 |
| 2025-02-23 | 0 | 0 | 12.5 | 1.6 | 48 | 12.4 | 29.9 | 0 | 0 | muy_bajo | 1 |
| 2025-02-24 | 0 | 0 | 12.3 | 6.6 | 55 | 18.7 | 60.1 | 2 | 0.3 | muy_bajo | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: EFFIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
19 Feb 2025 · 202 MW · 36
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
It had gone 5 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 2.0 mm on 24 Feb.
94% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 77 ha in 2017, 174 ha in 2018, 904 ha in 2019, 617 ha in 2020, 997 ha in 2021, 1,068 ha in 2022, 756 ha in 2023, 559 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 1,632 ha that had burned before.
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
Natura 2000 protected area affected: 100 %
Natura 2000 sites (European Environment Agency, 2024 release) crossed by the perimeter.
Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.
Inside the perimeter there were about 0.15 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
We checked this page against 4 sources published once the fire was out. This is what they add:
Official figures are measured differently from satellite ones and sometimes cover only part of the fire.
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Feb | 13.7 °C | 57 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very low 1 |
| 20 Feb | 14.8 °C | 56 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very low 2 |
| 21 Feb | 14.3 °C | 47 % | 66 km/h | 3.0 mm | Very low 4 |
| 22 Feb | 9.5 °C | 71 % | 27 km/h | 12.7 mm | Very low 0 |
| 23 Feb | 12.5 °C | 48 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very low 0 |
| 24 Feb after | 12.3 °C | 55 % | 60 km/h | 2.0 mm | Very low 0 |
It started with an FWI of 0.6, a minimum humidity of 57% and 5 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 24.
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 2.7 mm on 31 Jan.
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 12.7 mm on 8 Apr.
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 12.7 mm on 8 Apr.
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.1 mm on 20 Oct.
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.1 mm on 20 Oct.
It was 13.0 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 5 days, against 1 day.
None of its 24 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 4.8 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
It was considered over on 23 Feb, and on 24 Feb 2.0 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 24 of 24, with a median of 4.8 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
On 19 February 2025 the air beside the fire reached 9 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but no daily average passed the WHO guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings
Satellite cross-check
No changes since 24 October 2026.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.