Skip to content
worldfires
KH · Cambodia · –

Veal Veaeng fire, 26 January 2021 Veal Veaeng

Out · last detection 11 Feb 2021, 06:21 UTC

The fire started on 26 January 2021 in Veal Veaeng, Cambodia, and satellites saw it burning for 17 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,059 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 31th largest in Pursat since 2016 (of 31 with a page). Number 65 in Cambodia in 2021, of 71.

The power measured by the satellite is low (19.9 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
2,059ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
17days
26 Jan 2021 – 11 Feb 2021
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
26 Jan
2021
Heat detections
60
in a single hotspot: 20 MW
Danger at start
18
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
22MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 26 Jan11 Feb
11 Feb 2021

How it evolved, day by day

26 Jan 2021 · 5 MW · 1 27 Jan 2021 · 3 MW · 1 28 Jan 2021 · 18 MW · 4 29 Jan 2021 · 30 MW · 5 30 Jan 2021 · 48 MW · 12 31 Jan 2021 · 40 MW · 8 1 Feb 2021 · 42 MW · 9 2 Feb 2021 · 2 MW · 1 3 Feb 2021 · 61 MW · 5 4 Feb 2021 · 2 MW · 2 5 Feb 2021 · 11 MW · 2 6 Feb 2021 · 10 MW · 4 7 Feb 2021 · 15 MW · 3 11 Feb 2021 · 20 MW · 3
26 Jan 29 Jan 3 Feb 7 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

34°high
37km/h · peak gust
41%lowest humidity

It had gone 31 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

66% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 880 ha in 2016, 825 ha in 2020. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 1,356 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.3% of the area of London (21 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Veal Veaeng where it started
    2,073 ha reached on 26 Jan
    0.5 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area0.12 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.12 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
26 Jan 32.3 °C 49 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 18
27 Jan 32.9 °C 44 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
28 Jan 32.5 °C 49 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
29 Jan 30.3 °C 43 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
30 Jan 30.5 °C 43 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
31 Jan 31.3 °C 42 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
1 Feb 31.5 °C 46 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 21
2 Feb 32.1 °C 43 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
3 Feb 31.6 °C 41 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
4 Feb 31.0 °C 42 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
5 Feb 31.5 °C 44 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
6 Feb 32.4 °C 42 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
7 Feb 31.7 °C 44 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
8 Feb 33.8 °C 46 % 25 km/h 0.2 mm High 22
9 Feb 26.9 °C 74 % 20 km/h 14.7 mm Very low 0
10 Feb 28.8 °C 61 % 22 km/h 2.0 mm Very low 2
11 Feb 29.8 °C 50 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Low 6
12 Feb after 30.6 °C 40 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 14
13 Feb after 31.1 °C 37 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
14 Feb after 32.0 °C 40 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 18
15 Feb after 32.9 °C 36 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
16 Feb after 32.9 °C 40 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 21
17 Feb after 31.6 °C 47 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
18 Feb after 30.6 °C 40 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
19 Feb after 30.3 °C 44 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
20 Feb after 30.5 °C 38 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
21 Feb after 31.3 °C 38 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm High 22

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 18.1, a minimum humidity of 49% and 31 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 34.

FWI at the start 18.1
Minimum humidity 49 %
Days without rain 31
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Rovieng fire, December 2019
2,194 ha 26 days FWI 18.5 Min. humidity 48 % 224 km away, in 2019

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

18 days
median duration
2,796 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
1.5 mm
rain at the end (median; 18 of 34 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (2,059 ha against a median of 2,796 ha) and lasted 17 days, against 18 days.

In 16 of 34, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.5 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
37km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 11 Feb, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 18 of 34, with a median of 1.5 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 19 Jan 2021
After · 18 Feb 2021

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 60Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Cambodia

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Veal Veaeng fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 26 January 2021 to 11 February 2021 (17 days). The perimeter dates it from 28 January 2021 to 4 February 2021.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,059 hectares (20.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Veal Veaeng (2,073 ha, 0.5 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 33.8 °C, humidity dropped to 41 % and gusts hit 37 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 24, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Cambodia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 34. Their median duration was 18 days and their median area 2,796 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 16 of 34, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.5 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 4 February 2021 → 11 February 2021.
  2. Start date: 28 January 2021 → 26 January 2021.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 28 January 2021 to 4 February 2021. 60 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.