Utracán fire, 15 December 2016 Utracán
The fire started on 15 December 2016 in Utracán, Argentina, and satellites saw it burning for 3 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,457 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 86th largest in La Pampa since 2016 (of 190 with a page). Number 68 in Argentina in 2016, of 255.
The power measured by the satellite is low (14.8 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
- Burnt area
- 3,457ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 3days
- 15 Dec 2016 – 17 Dec 2016
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- departments
- Started on
- 15 Dec
- 2016
- Heat detections
- 124
- in a single hotspot: 15 MW
- Danger at start
- 41
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 577MW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 10 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.5 mm on 25 Dec.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
What happened to each town
-
Utracán where it started3,470 ha reached on 15 Dec0.3 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Dec | 37.2 °C | 16 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 16 Dec | 37.2 °C | 19 % | 52 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 17 Dec | 32.3 °C | 19 % | 44 km/h | 0.7 mm | High 32 |
| 18 Dec after | 30.5 °C | 12 % | 44 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 36 |
| 19 Dec after | 34.6 °C | 11 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 20 Dec after | 39.4 °C | 12 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 21 Dec after | 27.8 °C | 11 % | 61 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 22 Dec after | 29.8 °C | 17 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 23 Dec after | 32.6 °C | 17 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 24 Dec after | 35.6 °C | 16 % | 54 km/h | 0.2 mm | Very high 47 |
| 25 Dec after | 31.9 °C | 12 % | 54 km/h | 1.5 mm | Very high 43 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 124Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 4,186 haUtracán23 December 2016 · 1 day · 18 km away
- 71,910 haUtracán27 January 2018 · 6 days · 19 km away
- 4,164 haUtracánDecember 2017 · 2 days · 28 km away
- 9,527 haUtracán21 December 2016 · 3 days · 30 km away
- 7,154 haUtracánAugust 2022 · 3 days · 34 km away
- 11,767 haUtracán21 December 2016 · 4 days · 40 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Utracán fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 15 December 2016 and 17 December 2016: 3 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,457 hectares (34.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Utracán (3,470 ha, 0.3 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 37.2 °C, humidity dropped to 16 % and gusts hit 54 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 44, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Argentina (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 911 · 100
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.