Skip to content
worldfires
ZW · Zimbabwe · –

Umguza fire, 4 September 2023 Umguza

Out · last detection 7 Sept 2023, 11:31 UTC

The fire started on 4 September 2023 in Umguza, Zimbabwe, and satellites saw it burning for 4 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,141 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 336th largest in Matabeleland North since 2016 (of 402 with a page). Number 129 in Zimbabwe in 2023, of 173.

Compare with…
Burnt area
1,141ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
4days
4 Sept 2023 – 7 Sept 2023
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
4 Sept
2023
Heat detections
39
in a single hotspot: 59 MW
Danger at start
48
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
158MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 4 Sept7 Sept
7 Sept 2023

How it evolved, day by day

4 Sept 2023 · 4 MW · 3 5 Sept 2023 · 224 MW · 12 6 Sept 2023 · 384 MW · 22 7 Sept 2023 · 22 MW · 2
4 Sept 5 Sept 6 Sept 7 Sept

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

35°high
35km/h · peak gust
9%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

66% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 557 ha in 2019, 487 ha in 2022. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 749 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.7% of the area of London (11 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Umguza where it started
    1,144 ha reached on 4 Sept
    0.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Very dry air: 23 % of the area in Zimbabwe 60 days without rain: 63 % of the area in Zimbabwe

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
4 Sept 32.7 °C 9 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
5 Sept 32.5 °C 20 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
6 Sept 35.1 °C 10 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
7 Sept 33.9 °C 17 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
8 Sept after 33.7 °C 18 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
9 Sept after 33.4 °C 9 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
10 Sept after 32.9 °C 16 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
11 Sept after 35.9 °C 14 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
12 Sept after 28.5 °C 13 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 61
13 Sept after 25.3 °C 43 % 51 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
14 Sept after 30.9 °C 21 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
15 Sept after 31.5 °C 25 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
16 Sept after 34.6 °C 17 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
17 Sept after 36.5 °C 11 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 60

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 48.1, a minimum humidity of 9% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 18.

FWI at the start 48.1
Minimum humidity 9 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Insiza fire, September 2018
1,100 ha 1 day FWI 48.3 Min. humidity 9 % 126 km away, in 2018

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

6 days
median duration
2,006 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
1.9 mm
rain at the end (median; 2 of 18 had it)

It stayed below its twins: 1,141 ha against a median of 2,006 ha. It lasted 4 days, against 6 days.

In 16 of 18, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.9 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
35km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 7 Sept, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 2 of 18, with a median of 1.9 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 28 Aug 2023
After · 14 Sept 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 6 September 2023 the air beside the fire reached 52 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 26: 1.7 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak52 µg/m³
Days over the guideline4 days
PM1074 µg/m³
Optical depth0.58
3 Sept5 Sept7 Sept9 Sept
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 39Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Zimbabwe

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Umguza fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 4 September 2023 to 7 September 2023 (4 days). The perimeter dates it from 5 September 2023 to 7 September 2023.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,141 hectares (11.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Umguza (1,144 ha, 0.2 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 35.1 °C, humidity dropped to 9 % and gusts hit 35 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 54, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Zimbabwe (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 18. Their median duration was 6 days and their median area 2,006 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 16 of 18, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.9 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Start date: 5 September 2023 → 4 September 2023.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 5 September 2023 to 7 September 2023. 39 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.