Tsumkwe fire, October 2016 Tsumkwe
The fire started on 9 October 2016 in Tsumkwe, Namibia, and satellites saw it burning for 4 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,783 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 90th largest in Otjozondjupa since 2016 (of 214 with a page). Number 44 in Namibia in 2016, of 108.
- Burnt area
- 3,783ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 4days
- 9 Oct 2016 – 12 Oct 2016
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- constituencies
- Started on
- 9 Oct
- 2016
- Heat detections
- 119
- in a single hotspot: 103 MW
- Danger at start
- 58
- Extreme · FWI index
- Energy released
- 2.6GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
What happened to each town
-
Tsumkwe where it started3,811 ha reached on 9 Oct0.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct | 33.1 °C | 10 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 10 Oct | 35.8 °C | 6 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 11 Oct | 38.1 °C | 7 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 63 |
| 12 Oct | 38.1 °C | 11 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 13 Oct after | 38.3 °C | 9 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 65 |
| 14 Oct after | 38.1 °C | 10 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 70 |
| 15 Oct after | 37.7 °C | 10 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 72 |
| 16 Oct after | 37.9 °C | 8 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 17 Oct after | 38.2 °C | 8 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 68 |
| 18 Oct after | 37.9 °C | 9 % | 45 km/h | 0.2 mm | Extreme 66 |
| 19 Oct after | 36.0 °C | 14 % | 53 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very extreme 71 |
| 20 Oct after | 35.5 °C | 17 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 61 |
| 21 Oct after | 36.0 °C | 16 % | 23 km/h | 0.1 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 22 Oct after | 35.9 °C | 15 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 119Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 7,668 haTsumkwe25 October 2023 · 7 days · 5 km away
- 9,603 haTsumkwe11 October 2022 · 4 days · 14 km away
- 11,314 haTsumkwe10 September 2017 · 9 days · 19 km away
- 7,006 haTsumkwe20 August 2023 · 7 days · 25 km away
- 14,353 haTsumkwe23 September 2018 · 4 days · 28 km away
- 12,264 haTsumkwe17 August 2023 · 9 days · 38 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Tsumkwe fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 9 October 2016 and 12 October 2016: 4 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,783 hectares (37.8 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Tsumkwe (3,811 ha, 0.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 38.1 °C, humidity dropped to 6 % and gusts hit 38 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 63, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Namibia (OCHA COD-AB). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from OCHA COD-AB (Namibia Statistics Agency (NSA)) (Creative Commons Attribution for Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY-IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.