Towong fire, January 2026 Towong, Greater Hume
The fire started on 5 January 2026 in Towong, Australia, and satellites saw it burning for 30 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 126,624 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
This page is probably a fire complex, not a single fire. GWIS merges into one perimeter the fires that touch over weeks, which in large burning seasons can join dozens of separate fires. The total area is reliable; the origin and dates refer to the whole complex.
It is the 3th largest in Victoria since 2016 (of 37 with a page). Number 5 in Australia in 2026, of 886.
Compare with…
Suggestions: Towong · 2019Greater Hume · 2019
- Burnt area
- 126,624ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 30days
- 5 Jan 2026 – 3 Feb 2026
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- local government areas
- Started on
- 5 Jan
- 2026
- Heat detections
- 6,702
- in a single hotspot: 1,335 MW
- Danger at start
- 23
- High · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 3.6GW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 4 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 3.1 mm on 8 Feb.
This area had burned before
37% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 2,709 ha in 2016, 1,448 ha in 2017, 4,273 ha in 2018, 31,239 ha in 2019, 801 ha in 2020, 1,768 ha in 2021, 339 ha in 2022, 594 ha in 2023, 5,453 ha in 2024, 4,167 ha in 2025. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 47,038 ha that had burned before.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Towong where it started126,180 ha reached on 5 Jan19 %
-
468 ha reached on 8 Jan0.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2025Inside the perimeter there were about 16 hectares of built-up land and about 200 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Jan | 30.0 °C | 20 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 23 |
| 6 Jan | 31.9 °C | 25 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 7 Jan | 35.3 °C | 16 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 8 Jan | 36.6 °C | 18 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 9 Jan | 36.4 °C | 14 % | 59 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 10 Jan | 25.4 °C | 21 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 11 Jan | 26.9 °C | 22 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 12 Jan | 27.7 °C | 27 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 13 Jan | 30.1 °C | 25 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 14 Jan | 30.5 °C | 25 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 15 Jan | 28.8 °C | 30 % | 44 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 32 |
| 16 Jan | 24.3 °C | 35 % | 54 km/h | 0.4 mm | High 32 |
| 17 Jan | 25.3 °C | 34 % | 44 km/h | 0.6 mm | High 23 |
| 18 Jan | 25.4 °C | 33 % | 32 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 24 |
| 19 Jan | 28.5 °C | 25 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 20 Jan | 27.5 °C | 35 % | 31 km/h | 1.1 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 21 Jan | 27.5 °C | 31 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 22 Jan | 24.0 °C | 21 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 23 Jan | 27.8 °C | 22 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 24 Jan | 32.4 °C | 14 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 25 Jan | 36.4 °C | 12 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 26 Jan | 36.6 °C | 15 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 27 Jan | 36.8 °C | 13 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 28 Jan | 38.6 °C | 17 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 29 Jan | 35.8 °C | 26 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 30 Jan | 38.0 °C | 17 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 31 Jan | 37.8 °C | 18 % | 59 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 1 Feb | 26.9 °C | 23 % | 49 km/h | 0.9 mm | High 34 |
| 2 Feb | 24.0 °C | 18 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 3 Feb | 25.1 °C | 22 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 4 Feb after | 30.6 °C | 17 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 5 Feb after | 33.7 °C | 12 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 6 Feb after | 32.4 °C | 10 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 7 Feb after | 32.6 °C | 16 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 8 Feb after | 24.8 °C | 44 % | 32 km/h | 3.1 mm | Low 8 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 12 January 2026 the air beside the fire reached 331 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 136: 9.1 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 6,702Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Towong fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 5 January 2026 to 3 February 2026 (30 days). The perimeter dates it from 5 January 2026 to 31 January 2026.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 126,624 hectares (1,266.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Towong (126,180 ha, 19 %); Greater Hume (468 ha, 0.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 38.6 °C, humidity dropped to 12 % and gusts hit 59 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 49, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Australia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 000 · Emergency number and official warnings ›
Satellite cross-check
History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
- Last day with fire: 31 January 2026 → 3 February 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 5 January 2026 to 31 January 2026. 6,702 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.