Burned area
satellite only1,976ha
Perimeter published by GWIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 5 May 2018 – 12 May 2018
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
MX · Mexico · –
Tomatlán fire, May 2018 Tomatlán
Out · last detection 12 May 2018, 08:07 UTC
The fire started on 5 May 2018 in Tomatlán, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 8 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,976 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 184th largest in Jalisco since 2016 (of 267 with a page). Number 153 in Mexico in 2018, of 233.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-27matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only8days
5 May 2018 to 12 May 2018: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 12 May 2018, 08:07 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only5 May 2018
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 5 May 2018
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
The worst day
satellite only79MW
Total radiative power on 6 May 2018; hotspots that day: 24.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 6 May 2018
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model22.2FWI · high
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 60.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 5 May 2018, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model29.4°C · 42% RH
High of 29.4 °C and minimum humidity of 42% on 5 May 2018; gusts of 42 km/h on 10 May 2018.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 5 May 2018 – 12 May 2018
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
logLast day with fire: 15 May 2018 → 12 May 2018.
-
logStart date: 30 April 2018 → 5 May 2018.
-
logLast day with fire: 12 May 2018 → 15 May 2018.
-
logStart date: 5 May 2018 → 30 April 2018.
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
Area logged each night
Move the slider to see which area the page published each day.
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/tomatlan-jalisco-2018-05?v=2026-10-27A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire tomatlan-jalisco-2018-05.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-05 | 15 | 37 | 29.4 | 18.5 | 42 | 10.8 | 33.5 | 0 | 22.2 | alto | 1 |
| 2018-05-06 | 24 | 79 | 28.4 | 19.1 | 55 | 13.5 | 39.6 | 0.2 | 21.7 | alto | 1 |
| 2018-05-07 | 14 | 18 | 28.5 | 19.8 | 50 | 13.3 | 38.5 | 0 | 21.8 | alto | 1 |
| 2018-05-08 | 6 | 29 | 29 | 19.6 | 33 | 13.5 | 39.2 | 0.4 | 26.6 | alto | 1 |
| 2018-05-09 | 9 | 45 | 27.9 | 19.1 | 46 | 13.1 | 36.4 | 0 | 25.2 | alto | 1 |
| 2018-05-10 | 14 | 32 | 28.1 | 18.4 | 44 | 16.2 | 42.5 | 0 | 27.6 | alto | 1 |
| 2018-05-11 | 9 | 34 | 28.4 | 18.9 | 42 | 14.7 | 39.6 | 0 | 26.8 | alto | 1 |
| 2018-05-12 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | 19.1 | 43 | 15 | 40 | 0 | 27.3 | alto | 1 |
| 2018-05-13 | 0 | 0 | 29.1 | 20 | 44 | 13 | 37.8 | 0.3 | 26.2 | alto | 0 |
| 2018-05-14 | 0 | 0 | 29.6 | 19.9 | 39 | 15.1 | 41.4 | 0 | 27.9 | alto | 0 |
| 2018-05-15 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 18.9 | 42 | 14.5 | 40.3 | 0 | 27.7 | alto | 0 |
| 2018-05-16 | 0 | 0 | 29.3 | 19.9 | 44 | 15 | 39.2 | 0 | 28.3 | alto | 0 |
| 2018-05-17 | 0 | 0 | 28.6 | 20.5 | 41 | 14.4 | 39.2 | 0 | 28.1 | alto | 0 |
| 2018-05-18 | 0 | 0 | 28.4 | 19.1 | 41 | 14 | 37.4 | 0 | 28.1 | alto | 0 |
| 2018-05-19 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 17.9 | 42 | 14.1 | 39.2 | 0 | 28.4 | alto | 0 |
| 2018-05-20 | 0 | 0 | 29.4 | 18.5 | 35 | 16.3 | 42.1 | 0 | 30.3 | alto | 0 |
| 2018-05-21 | 0 | 0 | 28.7 | 17.7 | 48 | 15.1 | 40.3 | 0 | 27.4 | alto | 0 |
| 2018-05-22 | 0 | 0 | 29.6 | 18.2 | 35 | 15.5 | 40.7 | 0 | 29.6 | alto | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 1,976ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 8days
- 5 May 2018 – 12 May 2018
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- municipalities
- Started on
- 5 May
- 2018
- Heat detections
- 93
- in a single hotspot: 0 MW
- Danger at start
- 22
- High · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 35MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
5 May12 May
12 May 2018
How it evolved, day by day
6 May
9 May
11 May
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
29°high
42km/h · peak gust
33%lowest humidity
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Tomatlán where it started1,988 ha0.7 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Started with 60 days without rain: 24 % of the area in Mexico
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 May | 29.4 °C | 42 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 6 May | 28.4 °C | 55 % | 40 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 22 |
| 7 May | 28.5 °C | 50 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 22 |
| 8 May | 29.0 °C | 33 % | 39 km/h | 0.4 mm | High 27 |
| 9 May | 27.9 °C | 46 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 10 May | 28.1 °C | 44 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 11 May | 28.4 °C | 42 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 12 May | 28.6 °C | 43 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 13 May after | 29.1 °C | 44 % | 38 km/h | 0.3 mm | High 26 |
| 14 May after | 29.6 °C | 39 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 15 May after | 29.0 °C | 42 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 16 May after | 29.3 °C | 44 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 17 May after | 28.6 °C | 41 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 18 May after | 28.4 °C | 41 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 19 May after | 29.0 °C | 42 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 20 May after | 29.4 °C | 35 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 21 May after | 28.7 °C | 48 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 22 May after | 29.6 °C | 35 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 22.2, a minimum humidity of 42% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 21.
FWI at the start
22.2
Minimum humidity
42 %
Days without rain
60+
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Tomatlán fire, May 2018
1,976 ha
8 days
FWI 22.2
Min. humidity 42 %
Cabo Corrientes fire, April 2025
1,689 ha
3 days
FWI 22.0
Min. humidity 43 %
36 km away, in 2025
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Tomatlán fire, May 2023
2,397 ha
14 days
FWI 21.9
Min. humidity 40 %
27 km away, in 2023
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Cabo Corrientes fire, March 2025
3,804 ha
16 days
FWI 20.7
Min. humidity 43 %
39 km away, in 2025
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Compostela fire, May 2024
2,170 ha
19 days
FWI 23.2
Min. humidity 43 %
102 km away, in 2024
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.6 mm on 10 Jun.
Cuautitlán de García Barragán fire, May 2020
2,327 ha
21 days
FWI 22.7
Min. humidity 40 %
130 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
What happened to them
- 14 days
- median duration
- 2,333 ha
- median area
- 100 %
- went past 1,000 ha
- 1.6 mm
- rain at the end (median; 7 of 21 had it)
It burned an area similar to its twins (1,976 ha against a median of 2,333 ha) and lasted 8 days, against 14 days.
In 14 of 21, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.6 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
—first rain
—no rain in ten days
42km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 12 May, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 7 of 21, with a median of 1.6 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 28 Apr 2018
After · 19 May 2018
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 0Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 6,579 haTomatlánApril 2026 · 50 days · 7 km away
- 11,252 haTalpa de AllendeMarch 2023 · 37 days · 24 km away
- 6,135 haCabo CorrientesApril 2023 · 13 days · 25 km away
- 7,719 haTomatlánApril 2025 · 15 days · 26 km away
- 14,196 haTalpa de Allende7 May 2019 · 25 days · 27 km away
- 12,266 haTalpa de Allende19 April 2023 · 26 days · 31 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Tomatlán fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 5 May 2018 and 12 May 2018: 8 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,976 hectares (19.8 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Tomatlán (1,988 ha, 0.7 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 29.4 °C, humidity dropped to 33 % and gusts hit 42 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 28, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 21. Their median duration was 14 days and their median area 2,333 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 14 of 21, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.6 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 911 · Emergency number and official warnings
Satellite cross-check
History of this page · 4 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
- Last day with fire: 15 May 2018 → 12 May 2018.
- Start date: 30 April 2018 → 5 May 2018.
- Last day with fire: 12 May 2018 → 15 May 2018.
- Start date: 5 May 2018 → 30 April 2018.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.