The fire started on 24 February 2020 in Tineo, Spain, and satellites saw it burning for 4 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 301 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 48th largest in Asturias since 2016 (of 225 with a page). Number 36 in Spain in 2020, of 89.
matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Burned area
with caveats
301ha
Perimeter published by EFFIS (Copernicus).
This page301EGIF (MITECO)566
Source
EFFIS (Copernicus)
Date
perimeter revised on 26 January 2022
+− cross-check
EGIF (MITECO): 566 ha (matched records: 1). Difference between the page and the official record: −46.8%. Matched on 1 November 2026. The two figures differ a lot, so these may not be exactly the same fire: take them as nearby records.
Duration by satellite
satellite only
4days
24 Feb 2020 to 27 Feb 2020: first and last day with fire on the page.
Source
EFFIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
Date
last detection: 24 Feb 2020, 13:35 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only
24 Feb 2020
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
Source
EFFIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
Date
24 Feb 2020
+− cross-check
The two figures differ a lot, so these may not be exactly the same fire: take them as nearby records.
Hotspots
satellite only
12
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 112 MW.
Source
NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP)
Date
24 Feb 2020 – 27 Feb 2020
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only
669MW
Total radiative power on 24 February 2020; hotspots that day: 12.
Source
NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
Date
24 Feb 2020
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model
3.4FWI · very low
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 6.
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings ›
Weather during the fire
model
17.4°C · 27% RH
High of 17.4 °C and minimum humidity of 27% on 24 February 2020; gusts of 74 km/h on 27 February 2020.
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
ⓘThis page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
· reconstructedweather
Weather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
· reconstructedofficial
Matched with the official EGIF (MITECO) record
Nearby records with very different figures: 566 ha (records: 1).
A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
17°high
74km/h · peak gust
27%lowest humidity
It had gone 6 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 3.7 mm on 29 Feb.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
What happened to each town
Tineo8,679 inhabitants · 10.1 km from the centrewhere it started
301 hareached on 24 Feb
0.6 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
What burned
Other natural land90 %
Broadleaved forest10 %
Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.
Official record
According to EGIF (MITECO), this fire started on 23 February 2020 and burned 566 ha (the satellite measured 301 ha). The two figures differ a lot, so these may not be exactly the same fire: take them as nearby records.
TineoLa Chana Cimera y Praos de la Sapera23 February 2020 · 19:53566 ha· extinguished on 29 February 2020· cause: arson
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Day
High
Min. humidity
Peak gust
Rain
Danger (FWI)
24 Feb
17.4 °C
27 %
40 km/h
0.0 mm
Very low 3
25 Feb
10.0 °C
55 %
43 km/h
3.6 mm
Very low 0
26 Feb
8.3 °C
64 %
48 km/h
1.6 mm
Very low 0
27 Feb
13.7 °C
55 %
74 km/h
0.0 mm
Very low 2
28 Feb after
15.8 °C
25 %
63 km/h
0.0 mm
Very low 3
29 Feb after
12.0 °C
34 %
105 km/h
3.7 mm
Very low 1
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 3.4, a minimum humidity of 27% and 6 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 25.
FWI at the start3.4
Minimum humidity27 %
Days without rain6
this firechosen twinsrest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Tineo fire, 24 February 2020
301 ha4 daysFWI 3.4Min. humidity 27 %
Cangas del Narcea fire, February 2026
193 ha3 daysFWI 0.6Min. humidity 27 %28 km away, in 2026
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 2.3 mm on 27 Feb.
It was 1.6 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 4 days, against 2 days.
Only 6 of its 25 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 2 of 25, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 4.1 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
3.7 mmfirst rain
29 Feb2 days after it ended
74km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 27 Feb, and on 29 Feb 3.7 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 23 of 25, with a median of 4.1 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 17 Feb 2020
After · 5 Mar 2020
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · Copernicus
On 28 February 2020 the air beside the fire reached 41 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 23: 1.6 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
PM2.5 peak41µg/m³
Days over the guideline2days
PM1096µg/m³
WHO 15
22 Feb24 Feb26 Feb28 Feb1 Mar
GoodFairModeratePoorVery poorExtremely poor
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table· 12Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.›
⬇ Download CSVTimes in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Copernicus dates it between 24 February 2020 and 27 February 2020: 4 days between the first and last image with fire.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 301 hectares (3.0 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Tineo (301 ha, 0.6 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire started in Tineo and came within 10.1 km of its centre. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 17.4 °C, humidity dropped to 27 % and gusts hit 74 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 3, class Very low.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Spain (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 25. Their median duration was 2 days and their median area 189 ha; 8 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 6 of its 25 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 2 of 25, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 4.1 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
⚑Report an errorHow we know this›
Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 12 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
Compared with EGIF (MITECO): 566 official ha against 301 ha of perimeter; similar, but with reservations.
Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.