Tenterfield fire, February 2017 Tenterfield
The fire started on 3 February 2017 in Tenterfield, Australia, and satellites saw it burning for 10 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,732 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 106th largest in New South Wales since 2016 (of 130 with a page). Number 721 in Australia in 2017, of 862.
- Burnt area
- 5,732ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 10days
- 3 Feb 2017 – 12 Feb 2017
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- local government areas
- Started on
- 3 Feb
- 2017
- Heat detections
- 326
- in a single hotspot: 164 MW
- Danger at start
- 9
- Low · FWI index
- Energy released
- 3.3GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 5 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 19.4 mm on 13 Feb.
This area had burned before
0% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 9 ha in 2016.
What happened to each town
-
Tenterfield where it started5,745 ha reached on 3 Feb0.8 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Feb | 32.4 °C | 51 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Low 9 |
| 4 Feb | 32.7 °C | 34 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Low 11 |
| 5 Feb | 33.1 °C | 32 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 12 |
| 6 Feb | 34.7 °C | 30 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 14 |
| 7 Feb | 32.1 °C | 41 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 8 Feb | 27.5 °C | 49 % | 57 km/h | 2.1 mm | Low 6 |
| 9 Feb | 27.9 °C | 49 % | 49 km/h | 1.1 mm | Low 6 |
| 10 Feb | 33.9 °C | 27 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 15 |
| 11 Feb | 38.4 °C | 23 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 12 Feb | 37.6 °C | 28 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 13 Feb after | 29.0 °C | 48 % | 42 km/h | 19.4 mm | Very low 1 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 326Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 64,913 haTenterfield4 December 2019 · 20 days · 15 km away
- 8,347 haTenterfield13 February 2019 · 8 days · 19 km away
- 23,426 haTenterfield12 February 2019 · 9 days · 30 km away
- 6,397 haTenterfield5 December 2019 · 6 days · 30 km away
- 9,246 haSouthern Downs31 October 2023 · 3 days · 37 km away
- 8,324 haTenterfield12 February 2019 · 8 days · 38 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Tenterfield fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 3 February 2017 and 12 February 2017: 10 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,732 hectares (57.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Tenterfield (5,745 ha, 0.8 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 38.4 °C, humidity dropped to 23 % and gusts hit 57 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 21, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Australia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 000
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.