Skip to content
worldfires
SL · Sierra Leone · –

Tambakha fire, 21 January 2019 Tambakha

Out · last detection 5 Feb 2019, 02:21 UTC

The fire started on 21 January 2019 in Tambakha, Sierra Leone, and satellites saw it burning for 18 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,099 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 159th largest in Northern since 2016 (of 937 with a page). Number 40 in Sierra Leone in 2019, of 180.

Burnt area
2,099ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
18days
21 Jan 2019 – 7 Feb 2019
Municipalities hit
1
chiefdoms
Started on
21 Jan
2019
Heat detections
63
in a single hotspot: 56 MW
Danger at start
42
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
72MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 21 Jan7 Feb
5 Feb 2019

How it evolved, day by day

24 Jan 2019 · 12 MW · 1 25 Jan 2019 · 10 MW · 4 26 Jan 2019 · 1 MW · 1 27 Jan 2019 · 144 MW · 17 28 Jan 2019 · 230 MW · 14 29 Jan 2019 · 132 MW · 14 30 Jan 2019 · 39 MW · 8 3 Feb 2019 · 79 MW · 3 5 Feb 2019 · 1 MW · 1
24 Jan 26 Jan 28 Jan 30 Jan 5 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

39°high
36km/h · peak gust
12%lowest humidity

It had gone 38 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

25% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 392 ha in 2016, 125 ha in 2017.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.3% of the area of London (21 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Tambakha where it started
    2,113 ha reached on 24 Jan
    0.8 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
21 Jan 36.4 °C 27 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
22 Jan 37.7 °C 13 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
23 Jan 36.7 °C 15 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
24 Jan 36.3 °C 31 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
25 Jan 37.8 °C 18 % 21 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
26 Jan 37.9 °C 17 % 21 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
27 Jan 38.0 °C 12 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
28 Jan 36.4 °C 14 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
29 Jan 36.0 °C 27 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
30 Jan 35.2 °C 28 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
31 Jan 37.0 °C 24 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
1 Feb 38.6 °C 21 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
2 Feb 36.1 °C 30 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
3 Feb 36.5 °C 27 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
4 Feb 37.5 °C 24 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
5 Feb 37.9 °C 26 % 21 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
6 Feb 37.3 °C 30 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
7 Feb 37.6 °C 26 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
8 Feb after 37.0 °C 26 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
9 Feb after 37.1 °C 28 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
10 Feb after 37.6 °C 27 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
11 Feb after 38.4 °C 16 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
12 Feb after 38.6 °C 8 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
13 Feb after 38.6 °C 9 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
14 Feb after 37.5 °C 25 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
15 Feb after 38.8 °C 18 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
16 Feb after 38.9 °C 23 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
17 Feb after 37.6 °C 23 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 42.2, a minimum humidity of 27% and 38 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 55.

FWI at the start 42.2
Minimum humidity 27 %
Days without rain 38
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Libeisaygahun fire, January 2020
1,166 ha 5 days FWI 44.7 Min. humidity 26 % 92 km away, in 2020

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

10 days
median duration
1,370 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
3.3 mm
rain at the end (median; 36 of 55 had it)

It was 1.5 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 18 days, against 10 days.

Only 16 of its 55 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 19 of 55, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.3 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
36km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 7 Feb, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 36 of 55, with a median of 3.3 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 14 Jan 2019
After · 14 Feb 2019

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 63Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Sierra Leone

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Tambakha fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 21 January 2019 to 7 February 2019 (18 days). The perimeter dates it from 26 January 2019 to 31 January 2019.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,099 hectares (21.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Tambakha (2,113 ha, 0.8 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 38.6 °C, humidity dropped to 12 % and gusts hit 36 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 46, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Sierra Leone (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 55. Their median duration was 10 days and their median area 1,370 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 16 of its 55 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 19 of 55, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.3 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 31 January 2019 → 7 February 2019.
  2. Start date: 26 January 2019 → 21 January 2019.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 26 January 2019 to 31 January 2019. 63 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.