Burned area
satellite only32,942ha
Perimeter published by GWIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 11 Feb 2022 – 20 Feb 2022
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
AR · Argentina · –
Santo Tomé fire, 11 February 2022 Santo Tomé
Out · last detection 20 Feb 2022, 05:22 UTC
The fire started on 11 February 2022 in Santo Tomé, Argentina, and satellites saw it burning for 10 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 32,942 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 3th largest in Corrientes since 2016 (of 198 with a page). Number 7 in Argentina in 2022, of 441.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-24matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only10days
11 Feb 2022 to 20 Feb 2022: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 20 Feb 2022, 05:22 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only11 Feb 2022
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 11 Feb 2022
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Hotspots
satellite only1,218
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 545 MW.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP)
- Date
- 11 Feb 2022 – 20 Feb 2022
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only9,064MW
Total radiative power on 16 February 2022; hotspots that day: 350.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 16 Feb 2022
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model50.1FWI · extreme
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 5.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 11 Feb 2022, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model39.1°C · 17% RH
High of 39.1 °C and minimum humidity of 17% on 16 February 2022; gusts of 45 km/h on 20 February 2022.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 11 Feb 2022 – 20 Feb 2022
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
Living inside
model≈ 90people
Estimated residents inside the perimeter and 1.5 ha of built-up area (100 m grid, epoch 2020).
- Source
- GHSL R2023A · JRC
- Date
- calculated on 24 October 2026
+− cross-check
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
What was saved on 24 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 32,942 ha
- Dates
- 11 Feb 2022 – 20 Feb 2022
- Name
- Santo Tomé
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/santo-tome-2022-02?v=2026-10-24A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire santo-tome-2022-02.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-11 | 86 | 2,086 | 38.8 | 25.2 | 25 | 18.6 | 42.5 | 0 | 50.1 | extremo | 1 |
| 2022-02-12 | 4 | 28 | 32.8 | 22 | 44 | 24.1 | 41.8 | 3.8 | 35.6 | alto | 1 |
| 2022-02-13 | 32 | 345 | 30 | 18.3 | 32 | 18.7 | 34.9 | 1.3 | 6.2 | bajo | 1 |
| 2022-02-14 | 34 | 692 | 33.2 | 15.6 | 18 | 13.4 | 26.6 | 0 | 27.7 | alto | 1 |
| 2022-02-15 | 193 | 4,570 | 36.8 | 18.4 | 15 | 14.2 | 29.9 | 0 | 38.6 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2022-02-16 | 350 | 9,064 | 39.1 | 21.7 | 17 | 14.8 | 29.2 | 0 | 32.7 | alto | 1 |
| 2022-02-17 | 316 | 6,593 | 37 | 23.5 | 25 | 18 | 36.7 | 0 | 42.2 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2022-02-18 | 91 | 1,471 | 37.2 | 21.9 | 21 | 16.8 | 33.1 | 0 | 39.8 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2022-02-19 | 84 | 2,254 | 37.4 | 21.6 | 21 | 16.2 | 31 | 0 | 33.5 | alto | 1 |
| 2022-02-20 | 28 | 149 | 35.5 | 23.5 | 34 | 24.1 | 44.6 | 1.3 | 58.8 | extremo | 1 |
| 2022-02-21 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 20.5 | 40 | 14.3 | 28.1 | 1.3 | 11.6 | moderado | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 32,942ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 10days
- 11 Feb 2022 – 20 Feb 2022
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- departments
- Started on
- 11 Feb
- 2022
- Heat detections
- 1,218
- in a single hotspot: 545 MW
- Danger at start
- 50
- Extreme · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 2.7GW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
11 Feb20 Feb
20 Feb 2022
How it evolved, day by day
11 Feb
13 Feb
16 Feb
19 Feb
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
39°high
45km/h · peak gust
15%lowest humidity
It had gone 5 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.3 mm on 21 Feb.
This area had burned before
17% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 678 ha in 2016, 488 ha in 2017, 1,123 ha in 2018, 711 ha in 2019, 2,285 ha in 2020, 1,681 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 5,443 ha that had burned before.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Santo Tomé where it started33,012 ha reached on 11 Feb4.7 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Built-up area1.5 ha
Residents≈ 90
Inside the perimeter there were about 1.5 hectares of built-up land and about 90 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Feb | 38.8 °C | 25 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 12 Feb | 32.8 °C | 44 % | 42 km/h | 3.8 mm | High 36 |
| 13 Feb | 30.0 °C | 32 % | 35 km/h | 1.3 mm | Low 6 |
| 14 Feb | 33.2 °C | 18 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 15 Feb | 36.8 °C | 15 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 16 Feb | 39.1 °C | 17 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 17 Feb | 37.0 °C | 25 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 18 Feb | 37.2 °C | 21 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 19 Feb | 37.4 °C | 21 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 20 Feb | 35.5 °C | 34 % | 45 km/h | 1.3 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 21 Feb after | 34.0 °C | 40 % | 28 km/h | 1.3 mm | Moderate 12 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 50.1, a minimum humidity of 25% and 5 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 23.
FWI at the start
50.1
Minimum humidity
25 %
Days without rain
5
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Santo Tomé fire, 11 February 2022
32,942 ha
10 days
FWI 50.1
Min. humidity 25 %
Caapucu fire, September 2020
2,532 ha
8 days
FWI 50.6
Min. humidity 24 %
234 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 5.0 mm on 8 Oct.
Tavai fire, January 2022
2,754 ha
11 days
FWI 48.9
Min. humidity 26 %
216 km away, in 2022
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 39.9 mm on 27 Jan.
Villa Franca fire, September 2020
2,716 ha
3 days
FWI 50.2
Min. humidity 23 %
234 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 5.5 mm on 8 Oct.
Santo Tomé fire, November 2020
5,029 ha
2 days
FWI 55.2
Min. humidity 22 %
24 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 31.9 mm on 26 Nov.
Bermejo fire, August 2020
1,814 ha
8 days
FWI 51.1
Min. humidity 28 %
224 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 7.4 mm on 6 Sept.
What happened to them
- 4 days
- median duration
- 2,385 ha
- median area
- 100 %
- went past 1,000 ha
- 5.5 mm
- rain at the end (median; 21 of 23 had it)
It was 13.8 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 10 days, against 4 days.
None of its 23 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 2 of 23, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.5 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
1.3 mmfirst rain
21 Febthe day after it ended
45km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 20 Feb, and on 21 Feb 1.3 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 21 of 23, with a median of 5.5 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 4 Feb 2022
After · 27 Feb 2022
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 1,218Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 12,927 haSanto Tomé31 January 2022 · 4 days · 20 km away
- 4,994 haSanto Tomé14 January 2022 · 3 days · 21 km away
- 7,356 haSan Martín13 February 2022 · 4 days · 22 km away
- 5,029 haSanto Tomé24 November 2020 · 2 days · 24 km away
- 9,387 haItuzaingó20 November 2020 · 6 days · 33 km away
- 4,321 haSanto ToméAugust 2020 · 8 days · 39 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Santo Tomé fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 11 February 2022 and 20 February 2022: 10 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 32,942 hectares (329.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Santo Tomé (33,012 ha, 4.7 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 39.1 °C, humidity dropped to 15 % and gusts hit 45 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 59, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Argentina (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 23. Their median duration was 4 days and their median area 2,385 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. None of its 23 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 2 of 23, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 5.5 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 911 · 100 · Emergency number and official warnings
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 1,218 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.