Burned area
satellite only3,369ha
Perimeter published by GWIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 11 Mar 2017 – 26 Mar 2017
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
MX · Mexico · –
Santo Domingo Zanatepec fire, March 2017 Santo Domingo Zanatepec, Reforma de Pineda, San Francisco del Mar
Out · last detection 26 Mar 2017, 19:41 UTC
The fire started on 11 March 2017 in Santo Domingo Zanatepec, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 16 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,369 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.
It is the 43th largest in Oaxaca since 2016 (of 185 with a page). Number 116 in Mexico in 2017, of 374.
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-24matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only16days
11 Mar 2017 to 26 Mar 2017: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 26 Mar 2017, 19:41 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only11 Mar 2017
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 11 Mar 2017
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Hotspots
satellite only166
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 42 MW.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP)
- Date
- 11 Mar 2017 – 26 Mar 2017
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only315MW
Total radiative power on 15 March 2017; hotspots that day: 28.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 15 Mar 2017
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model22.9FWI · high
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 7.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 11 Mar 2017, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model36.2°C · 28% RH
High of 36.2 °C and minimum humidity of 28% on 26 March 2017; gusts of 67 km/h on 14 March 2017.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 11 Mar 2017 – 26 Mar 2017
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
What was saved on 24 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 3,369 ha
- Dates
- 11 Mar 2017 – 26 Mar 2017
- Name
- Santo Domingo Zanatepec
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/santo-domingo-zanatepec-2017-03?v=2026-10-24A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire santo-domingo-zanatepec-2017-03.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-11 | 11 | 48 | 35.1 | 22.1 | 39 | 9.7 | 28.1 | 0 | 22.9 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-12 | 1 | 1 | 35.3 | 23.5 | 40 | 8 | 28.8 | 0.2 | 23.8 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-13 | 1 | 2 | 34.1 | 24.3 | 41 | 12.6 | 32.8 | 0 | 25.4 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-14 | 0 | 0 | 30.7 | 22.8 | 45 | 24.9 | 67 | 0 | 45.8 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-15 | 28 | 315 | 32.7 | 21.7 | 41 | 19.8 | 54 | 0 | 38.8 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-16 | 19 | 183 | 32.6 | 21.3 | 42 | 20.5 | 56.5 | 0 | 38.8 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-17 | 25 | 160 | 33.3 | 21.3 | 41 | 18.4 | 51.1 | 0 | 37 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-18 | 14 | 47 | 32.3 | 21.3 | 40 | 22 | 60.1 | 0 | 40 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-19 | 16 | 67 | 32.1 | 22 | 42 | 23 | 61.9 | 0 | 43.7 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-20 | 20 | 248 | 32.6 | 20 | 34 | 17.8 | 48.6 | 0 | 40.6 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-21 | 15 | 151 | 34.5 | 20.8 | 32 | 15.9 | 45.4 | 0 | 38.2 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-22 | 4 | 13 | 34.6 | 20.6 | 32 | 17 | 48.2 | 0 | 36 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-23 | 3 | 5 | 34.7 | 21.7 | 34 | 12.4 | 36.7 | 0 | 35.3 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-24 | 1 | 2 | 34.4 | 21.2 | 34 | 15.1 | 43.6 | 0 | 36.8 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-25 | 1 | 5 | 33.9 | 20.7 | 34 | 14.5 | 42.8 | 0 | 38.1 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-26 | 7 | 93 | 36.2 | 21.5 | 28 | 15.7 | 45.4 | 0 | 36.2 | alto | 1 |
| 2017-03-27 | 0 | 0 | 32.7 | 22.1 | 45 | 14.1 | 44.3 | 0 | 39.7 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2017-03-28 | 0 | 0 | 30.5 | 23.2 | 64 | 15.9 | 45.4 | 1.9 | 29 | alto | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 3,369ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 16days
- 11 Mar 2017 – 26 Mar 2017
- Municipalities hit
- 3
- municipalities
- Started on
- 11 Mar
- 2017
- Heat detections
- 166
- in a single hotspot: 42 MW
- Danger at start
- 23
- High · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 89MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
11 Mar26 Mar
26 Mar 2017
How it evolved, day by day
11 Mar
15 Mar
18 Mar
21 Mar
24 Mar
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
36°high
67km/h · peak gust
28%lowest humidity
It had gone 7 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.9 mm on 28 Mar.
This area had burned before
8% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 285 ha in 2016.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Santo Domingo Zanatepec where it started2,878 ha reached on 11 Mar4.4 %
-
507 ha reached on 15 Mar15 %
-
2 ha0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2015Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Mar | 35.1 °C | 39 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 23 |
| 12 Mar | 35.3 °C | 40 % | 29 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 24 |
| 13 Mar | 34.1 °C | 41 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 14 Mar | 30.7 °C | 45 % | 67 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 15 Mar | 32.7 °C | 41 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 16 Mar | 32.6 °C | 42 % | 56 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 17 Mar | 33.3 °C | 41 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 18 Mar | 32.3 °C | 40 % | 60 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 19 Mar | 32.1 °C | 42 % | 62 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 20 Mar | 32.6 °C | 34 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 21 Mar | 34.5 °C | 32 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 22 Mar | 34.6 °C | 32 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 23 Mar | 34.7 °C | 34 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 24 Mar | 34.4 °C | 34 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 25 Mar | 33.9 °C | 34 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 26 Mar | 36.2 °C | 28 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 27 Mar after | 32.7 °C | 45 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 28 Mar after | 30.5 °C | 64 % | 45 km/h | 1.9 mm | High 29 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 22.9, a minimum humidity of 39% and 7 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 15.
FWI at the start
22.9
Minimum humidity
39 %
Days without rain
7
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Santo Domingo Zanatepec fire, March 2017
3,369 ha
16 days
FWI 22.9
Min. humidity 39 %
Santa María Chimalapa fire, May 2024
1,763 ha
10 days
FWI 23.4
Min. humidity 39 %
68 km away, in 2024
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Santiago Niltepec fire, February 2022
2,794 ha
7 days
FWI 21.1
Min. humidity 41 %
26 km away, in 2022
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
San Miguel Chimalapa fire, May 2016
2,967 ha
9 days
FWI 19.6
Min. humidity 38 %
43 km away, in 2016
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 3.3 mm on 11 May.
San Miguel Chimalapa fire, April 2016
1,799 ha
15 days
FWI 23.2
Min. humidity 36 %
37 km away, in 2016
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 5.0 mm on 3 May.
La Concordia fire, April 2023
3,044 ha
9 days
FWI 22.8
Min. humidity 41 %
163 km away, in 2023
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 4.4 mm on 2 May.
What happened to them
- 10 days
- median duration
- 2,923 ha
- median area
- 100 %
- went past 1,000 ha
- 2.7 mm
- rain at the end (median; 12 of 15 had it)
It burned an area similar to its twins (3,369 ha against a median of 2,923 ha) and lasted 16 days, against 10 days.
In 3 of 15, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.7 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
1.9 mmfirst rain
28 Mar2 days after it ended
67km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 26 Mar, and on 28 Mar 1.9 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 12 of 15, with a median of 2.7 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 4 Mar 2017
After · 2 Apr 2017
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 166Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 7,074 haSanto Domingo ZanatepecFebruary 2026 · 12 days · 3 km away
- 5,821 haSan Pedro TapanatepecFebruary 2016 · 16 days · 15 km away
- 6,068 haSan Miguel ChimalapaApril 2021 · 11 days · 27 km away
- 5,694 haSan Miguel ChimalapaMarch 2017 · 17 days · 28 km away
- 19,875 haSan Miguel ChimalapaMarch 2024 · 26 days · 31 km away
- 5,881 haSan Miguel ChimalapaFebruary 2016 · 8 days · 31 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Santo Domingo Zanatepec fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 11 March 2017 and 26 March 2017: 16 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,369 hectares (33.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 3 municipalities: Santo Domingo Zanatepec (2,878 ha, 4.4 %); Reforma de Pineda (507 ha, 15 %); San Francisco del Mar (2 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 36.2 °C, humidity dropped to 28 % and gusts hit 67 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 46, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 15. Their median duration was 10 days and their median area 2,923 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 3 of 15, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.7 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 911 · Emergency number and official warnings
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 166 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.