Skip to content
worldfires
CL · Chile ·

Santa Juana fire, January 2021 Santa Juana, Nacimiento

Out · last detection 19 Jan 2021, 18:29 UTC

The fire started on 19 January 2021 in Santa Juana, Chile, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,428 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 41th largest in Región del Bío-Bío since 2016 (of 62 with a page). Number 11 in Chile in 2021, of 21.

The power measured by the satellite is low (19.1 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
1,428ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
1day
19 Jan 2021 – 19 Jan 2021
Municipalities hit
2
communes
Started on
19 Jan
2021
Heat detections
41
in a single hotspot: 19 MW
Danger at start
29
High · FWI index
Average daily power
248MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 19 Jan19 Jan

How it evolved, day by day

19 Jan 2021 · 248 MW · 41

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

34°high
27km/h · peak gust
27%lowest humidity

It had gone 20 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 5.4 mm on 28 Jan.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.9% of the area of London (14 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Santa Juana where it started
    930 ha reached on 19 Jan
    1.2 %
  2. 501 ha reached on 19 Jan
    0.6 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area2.3 ha
Residents≈ 100

Inside the perimeter there were about 2.3 hectares of built-up land and about 100 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
19 Jan 34.0 °C 27 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
20 Jan after 35.2 °C 26 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
21 Jan after 32.6 °C 27 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
22 Jan after 35.1 °C 26 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
23 Jan after 33.4 °C 29 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
24 Jan after 30.4 °C 34 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
25 Jan after 27.4 °C 26 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
26 Jan after 26.0 °C 31 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
27 Jan after 24.9 °C 32 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
28 Jan after 20.9 °C 62 % 43 km/h 5.4 mm Very low 4

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 29.0, a minimum humidity of 27% and 20 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 32.

FWI at the start 29.0
Minimum humidity 27 %
Days without rain 20
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Hualqui fire, March 2025
3,202 ha 2 days FWI 25.0 Min. humidity 26 % 25 km away, in 2025

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 15.0 mm on 29 Mar.

What happened to them

4 days
median duration
1,805 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
8.4 mm
rain at the end (median; 19 of 32 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (1,428 ha against a median of 1,805 ha) and lasted 1 day, against 4 days.

In 13 of 32, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 8.4 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

5.4 mmfirst rain
28 Jan9 days after it ended
27km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 19 Jan, and on 28 Jan 5.4 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 19 of 32, with a median of 8.4 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 12 Jan 2021
After · 26 Jan 2021

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 41Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Chile

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Santa Juana fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 19 January 2021 and 19 January 2021: 1 day between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,428 hectares (14.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Santa Juana (930 ha, 1.2 %); Nacimiento (501 ha, 0.6 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 34.0 °C, humidity dropped to 27 % and gusts hit 27 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 29, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Chile (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 32. Their median duration was 4 days and their median area 1,805 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 13 of 32, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 8.4 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 130 (CONAF) · 132 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 130 (CONAF) · 132.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 41 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.