Skip to content
worldfires
AR · Argentina · –

Rivadavia fire, December 2019 Rivadavia

Out · last detection 3 Jan 2020, 05:27 UTC

The fire started on 18 December 2019 in Rivadavia, Argentina, and satellites saw it burning for 17 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,616 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 69th largest in Salta since 2016 (of 215 with a page). Number 66 in Argentina in 2019, of 158.

Burnt area
2,616ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
17days
18 Dec 2019 – 3 Jan 2020
Municipalities hit
1
departments
Started on
18 Dec
2019
Heat detections
160
in a single hotspot: 47 MW
Danger at start
46
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
111MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 18 Dec3 Jan
3 Jan 2020

How it evolved, day by day

20 Dec 2019 · 170 MW · 17 21 Dec 2019 · 17 MW · 2 22 Dec 2019 · 64 MW · 7 23 Dec 2019 · 765 MW · 75 24 Dec 2019 · 191 MW · 29 25 Dec 2019 · 4 MW · 3 26 Dec 2019 · 129 MW · 12 27 Dec 2019 · 13 MW · 1 28 Dec 2019 · 26 MW · 2 31 Dec 2019 · 7 MW · 1 1 Jan 2020 · 32 MW · 5 2 Jan 2020 · 27 MW · 4 3 Jan 2020 · 2 MW · 2
20 Dec 23 Dec 26 Dec 31 Dec 3 Jan

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

44°high
67km/h · peak gust
10%lowest humidity

It had gone one day without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 3.7 mm on 10 Jan.

This area had burned before

92% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 3,217 ha in 2016. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 2,414 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.7% of the area of London (26 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Rivadavia where it started
    2,655 ha reached on 20 Dec
    0.1 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
18 Dec 39.1 °C 15 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
19 Dec 41.6 °C 17 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
20 Dec 42.7 °C 18 % 67 km/h 3.6 mm Extreme 50
21 Dec 32.2 °C 28 % 44 km/h 5.5 mm Low 7
22 Dec 32.3 °C 29 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
23 Dec 38.3 °C 10 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
24 Dec 41.2 °C 16 % 58 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 70
25 Dec 43.4 °C 16 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
26 Dec 39.5 °C 32 % 52 km/h 1.5 mm High 30
27 Dec 43.7 °C 18 % 57 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
28 Dec 41.6 °C 23 % 60 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 65
29 Dec 36.5 °C 44 % 47 km/h 6.9 mm Moderate 16
30 Dec 37.7 °C 38 % 47 km/h 5.0 mm Low 11
31 Dec 36.1 °C 41 % 33 km/h 1.5 mm Low 6
1 Jan 38.0 °C 25 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
2 Jan 35.4 °C 32 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
3 Jan 36.9 °C 22 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
4 Jan after 37.7 °C 23 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
5 Jan after 41.8 °C 17 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
6 Jan after 38.1 °C 25 % 53 km/h 0.9 mm High 30
7 Jan after 34.7 °C 39 % 38 km/h 0.8 mm High 26
8 Jan after 40.7 °C 22 % 47 km/h 0.4 mm Very high 47
9 Jan after 41.4 °C 25 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
10 Jan after 43.6 °C 23 % 37 km/h 3.7 mm High 27

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 46.4, a minimum humidity of 15% and 1 day without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 24.

FWI at the start 46.4
Minimum humidity 15 %
Days without rain 1
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Almirante Brown fire, September 2020
2,386 ha 8 days FWI 45.0 Min. humidity 14 % 175 km away, in 2020

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

4 days
median duration
2,047 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
12.0 mm
rain at the end (median; 21 of 24 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (2,616 ha against a median of 2,047 ha) and lasted 17 days, against 4 days.

In 3 of 24, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 12.0 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

3.7 mmfirst rain
10 Jan7 days after it ended
67km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 3 Jan, and on 10 Jan 3.7 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 21 of 24, with a median of 12.0 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 11 Dec 2019
After · 10 Jan 2020

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 160Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Argentina

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Rivadavia fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 18 December 2019 to 3 January 2020 (17 days). The perimeter dates it from 20 December 2019 to 27 December 2019.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,616 hectares (26.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Rivadavia (2,655 ha, 0.1 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 43.7 °C, humidity dropped to 10 % and gusts hit 67 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 70, class Very extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Argentina (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 24. Their median duration was 4 days and their median area 2,047 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 3 of 24, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 12.0 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 911 · 100 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 27 December 2019 → 3 January 2020.
  2. Start date: 20 December 2019 → 18 December 2019.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 911 · 100.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 20 December 2019 to 27 December 2019. 160 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.