Ribaué fire, 9 September 2016 Gilé, Alto Molocue, Ribaué
The fire started on 9 September 2016 in Ribaué, Mozambique, and satellites saw it burning for 22 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 63,932 hectares from heat detections, spread across 4 municipalities.
It is the 2th largest in Nampula since 2016 (of 393 with a page). Number 5 in Mozambique in 2016, of 194.
- Burnt area
- 63,932ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 22days
- 9 Sept 2016 – 30 Sept 2016
- Municipalities hit
- 4
- districts
- Started on
- 9 Sept
- 2016
- Heat detections
- 3,609
- in a single hotspot: 177 MW
- Danger at start
- 27
- High · FWI index
- Energy released
- 46.5GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 9 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
What happened to each town
-
46,168 ha reached on 5 Sept5.1 %
-
7,836 ha reached on 14 Sept1.2 %
-
Ribaué where it started6,717 ha reached on 3 Sept1.1 %
-
3,494 ha reached on 6 Sept1.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept | 27.8 °C | 38 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 4 Sept | 28.4 °C | 32 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 5 Sept | 30.1 °C | 30 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 6 Sept | 30.0 °C | 34 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 7 Sept | 30.1 °C | 36 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 8 Sept | 31.7 °C | 33 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 9 Sept | 31.7 °C | 24 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 10 Sept | 32.9 °C | 30 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 11 Sept | 30.7 °C | 35 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 12 Sept | 29.8 °C | 36 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 13 Sept | 31.1 °C | 30 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 14 Sept | 30.8 °C | 38 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 15 Sept | 30.7 °C | 33 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 16 Sept | 32.8 °C | 26 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 17 Sept | 32.7 °C | 23 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 18 Sept | 31.6 °C | 29 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 19 Sept | 29.6 °C | 39 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 20 Sept | 27.9 °C | 45 % | 32 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 27 |
| 21 Sept | 29.5 °C | 36 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 22 Sept | 32.6 °C | 27 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 23 Sept | 33.0 °C | 27 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 24 Sept | 33.5 °C | 24 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 25 Sept | 34.3 °C | 22 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 26 Sept | 30.5 °C | 36 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 27 Sept | 31.6 °C | 34 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 28 Sept | 32.0 °C | 30 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 29 Sept | 32.4 °C | 36 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 30 Sept | 32.8 °C | 25 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 1 Oct after | 33.8 °C | 27 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 2 Oct after | 32.8 °C | 32 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 3 Oct after | 31.4 °C | 37 % | 44 km/h | 5.4 mm | Low 11 |
| 4 Oct after | 21.4 °C | 73 % | 34 km/h | 7.9 mm | Very low 0 |
| 5 Oct after | 28.6 °C | 36 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Low 8 |
| 6 Oct after | 30.9 °C | 32 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 19 |
| 7 Oct after | 32.3 °C | 35 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 8 Oct after | 32.6 °C | 30 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 9 Oct after | 32.4 °C | 35 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 10 Oct after | 34.0 °C | 29 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 11 Oct after | 34.5 °C | 24 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 12 Oct after | 34.5 °C | 27 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 13 Oct after | 34.1 °C | 26 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 14 Oct after | 31.3 °C | 34 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 15 Oct after | 30.6 °C | 43 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 3,609Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 90,638 haGilé27 September 2022 · 18 days · 13 km away
- 53,154 haRibaué6 September 2017 · 17 days · 15 km away
- 31,968 haGilé13 September 2018 · 17 days · 22 km away
- 70,839 haGilé8 September 2024 · 14 days · 25 km away
- 43,808 haMurrupula9 September 2025 · 22 days · 28 km away
- 32,621 haAlto Molocue29 September 2022 · 13 days · 37 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Ribaué fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 9 September 2016 and 30 September 2016: 22 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 63,932 hectares (639.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 4 municipalities: Gilé (46,168 ha, 5.1 %); Alto Molocue (7,836 ha, 1.2 %); Ribaué (6,717 ha, 1.1 %); Murrupula (3,494 ha, 1.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 34.3 °C, humidity dropped to 22 % and gusts hit 44 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 42, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mozambique (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.