Skip to content
worldfires
CO · Colombia · –

Puerto Carreño fire, 17 December 2017 Puerto Carreño

Out · last detection 18 Dec 2017, 17:51 UTC

The fire started on 17 December 2017 in Puerto Carreño, Colombia, and satellites saw it burning for 2 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,534 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 318th largest in Vichada since 2016 (of 327 with a page). Number 65 in Colombia in 2017, of 68.

Burnt area
1,534ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
2days
17 Dec 2017 – 18 Dec 2017
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
17 Dec
2017
Heat detections
47
in a single hotspot: 64 MW
Danger at start
12
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
352MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 17 Dec18 Dec
18 Dec 2017

How it evolved, day by day

17 Dec 2017 · 7 MW · 2 18 Dec 2017 · 696 MW · 45
17 Dec 18 Dec

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

34°high
35km/h · peak gust
44%lowest humidity

It had gone 10 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.4 mm on 28 Dec.

This area had burned before

29% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 451 ha in 2016.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1% of the area of London (15 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Puerto Carreño where it started
    1,544 ha reached on 17 Dec
    0.1 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
17 Dec 33.1 °C 44 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 12
18 Dec 34.2 °C 45 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 13
19 Dec after 33.6 °C 42 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 14
20 Dec after 33.1 °C 43 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 14
21 Dec after 32.9 °C 48 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 15
22 Dec after 33.0 °C 50 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
23 Dec after 33.9 °C 45 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 15
24 Dec after 33.4 °C 44 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
25 Dec after 33.8 °C 40 % 37 km/h 0.1 mm Moderate 17
26 Dec after 33.2 °C 43 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 18
27 Dec after 33.1 °C 51 % 34 km/h 0.5 mm Moderate 16
28 Dec after 33.5 °C 49 % 30 km/h 1.4 mm Low 8

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 12.4, a minimum humidity of 44% and 10 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 35.

FWI at the start 12.4
Minimum humidity 44 %
Days without rain 10
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Cumaribo fire, January 2023
2,883 ha 6 days FWI 12.2 Min. humidity 44 % 158 km away, in 2023

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

4 days
median duration
2,349 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
2.6 mm
rain at the end (median; 24 of 35 had it)

It stayed below its twins: 1,534 ha against a median of 2,349 ha. It lasted 2 days, against 4 days.

In 11 of 35, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.6 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

1.4 mmfirst rain
28 Dec10 days after it ended
35km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 18 Dec, and on 28 Dec 1.4 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 24 of 35, with a median of 2.6 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 10 Dec 2017
After · 25 Dec 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 47Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Colombia

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Puerto Carreño fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 17 December 2017 and 18 December 2017: 2 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,534 hectares (15.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Puerto Carreño (1,544 ha, 0.1 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 34.2 °C, humidity dropped to 44 % and gusts hit 35 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 13, class Moderate.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Colombia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 35. Their median duration was 4 days and their median area 2,349 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 11 of 35, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.6 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 123 · 119 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 123 · 119.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 47 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.