Skip to content
worldfires
ES · Spain · –

Penàguila fire, July 2024 Penàguila, Alcoleja, Benasau

Out · last detection 31 Jul 2024, 02:56 UTC

The fire started on 30 July 2024 in Penàguila, Spain, and satellites saw it burning for 2 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 275 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across 3 municipalities.

It is the 6th largest in Alacant / Alicante since 2016 (of 10 with a page). Number 33 in Spain in 2024, of 82.

The power measured by the satellite is low (3.3 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
275ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
2days
30 Jul 2024 – 31 Jul 2024
Municipalities hit
3
municipalities
Started on
30 Jul
2024
Heat detections
11
in a single hotspot: 3 MW
Danger at start
33
High · FWI index
Average daily power
28MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 30 Jul31 Jul

How it evolved, day by day

31 Jul 2024 · 28 MW · 11

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

34°high
36km/h · peak gust
27%lowest humidity

It had gone 16 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.1 mm on 2 Aug.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

What happened to each town

  1. Penàguila 305 inhabitants · fire reached the centre where it started
    193 ha reached on 31 Jul
    3.8 %
  2. Alcoleja 184 inhabitants · fire reached the centre
    42 ha
    2.9 %
  3. Benasau 174 inhabitants · fire reached the centre
    41 ha
    4.5 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Agricultural areas40 %
  • Other natural land27 %
  • Broadleaved forest26 %
  • Scrub and transitional woodland6.6 %

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area0.53 ha
Residents≈ 20

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.53 hectares of built-up land and about 20 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
30 Jul 32.3 °C 29 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
31 Jul 34.2 °C 27 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
1 Aug after 32.6 °C 43 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
2 Aug after 31.2 °C 45 % 28 km/h 1.1 mm Moderate 17

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 33.2, a minimum humidity of 29% and 16 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 16.

FWI at the start 33.2
Minimum humidity 29 %
Days without rain 16
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Jávea/Xàbia fire, September 2016
631 ha 3 days FWI 35.0 Min. humidity 29 % 47 km away, in 2016

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.2 mm on 10 Sept.

What happened to them

2 days
median duration
353 ha
median area
19 %
went past 1,000 ha
2.9 mm
rain at the end (median; 9 of 16 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (275 ha against a median of 353 ha) and lasted 2 days, against 2 days.

In 7 of 16, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.9 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

1.1 mmfirst rain
2 Aug2 days after it ended
36km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 31 Jul, and on 2 Aug 1.1 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 9 of 16, with a median of 2.9 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 23 Jul 2024
After · 7 Aug 2024

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 2 August 2024 the air beside the fire reached 34 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 18: 1.2 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak34 µg/m³
Days over the guideline1 day
PM1070 µg/m³
Optical depth0.50
28 Jul30 Jul1 Aug3 Aug
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 11Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Spain

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Penàguila fire last?
Copernicus dates it between 30 July 2024 and 31 July 2024: 2 days between the first and last image with fire.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 275 hectares (2.8 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 3 municipalities: Penàguila (193 ha, 3.8 %); Alcoleja (42 ha, 2.9 %); Benasau (41 ha, 4.5 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire started in Penàguila and reached its centre: the point marking it was inside the burnt area or less than 500 metres from it. That does not mean houses burned.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 34.2 °C, humidity dropped to 27 % and gusts hit 36 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 34, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Spain (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 16. Their median duration was 2 days and their median area 353 ha; 19 % went past 1,000 ha. In 7 of 16, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.9 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 11 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.