Burned area
satellite only3,222ha
Perimeter published by GWIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 11 Feb 2023 – 12 Feb 2023
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
VE · Venezuela · –
Pedro Camejo fire, 11 February 2023 Pedro Camejo
Out · last detection 12 Feb 2023, 18:06 UTC
The fire started on 11 February 2023 in Pedro Camejo, Venezuela, and satellites saw it burning for 2 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,222 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 175th largest in Apure since 2016 (of 761 with a page). Number 39 in Venezuela in 2023, of 193.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-24matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only2days
11 Feb 2023 to 12 Feb 2023: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 12 Feb 2023, 18:06 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only11 Feb 2023
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 11 Feb 2023
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Hotspots
satellite only75
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 145 MW.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP)
- Date
- 11 Feb 2023 – 12 Feb 2023
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only611MW
Total radiative power on 11 February 2023; hotspots that day: 27.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 11 Feb 2023
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model40.2FWI · very high
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 32.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 11 Feb 2023, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model34.6°C · 40% RH
High of 34.6 °C and minimum humidity of 40% on 12 February 2023; gusts of 44 km/h on 11 February 2023.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 11 Feb 2023 – 12 Feb 2023
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
What was saved on 24 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 3,222 ha
- Dates
- 11 Feb 2023 – 12 Feb 2023
- Name
- Pedro Camejo
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/pedro-camejo-2023-02?v=2026-10-24A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire pedro-camejo-2023-02.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-11 | 27 | 611 | 34.3 | 25.9 | 42 | 23.5 | 43.6 | 0 | 40.2 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2023-02-12 | 48 | 194 | 34.6 | 26.3 | 40 | 23 | 43.2 | 0 | 39.9 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2023-02-13 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | 26.1 | 47 | 19.7 | 40 | 0 | 36.7 | alto | 0 |
| 2023-02-14 | 0 | 0 | 33.8 | 26.1 | 48 | 19.5 | 38.5 | 0.1 | 37.4 | alto | 0 |
| 2023-02-15 | 0 | 0 | 33.4 | 27 | 49 | 23.3 | 46.4 | 0.1 | 43.2 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2023-02-16 | 0 | 0 | 32.7 | 25.8 | 44 | 25.6 | 49.7 | 0 | 46.8 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2023-02-17 | 0 | 0 | 33.5 | 24 | 34 | 26.5 | 49 | 0 | 48.6 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2023-02-18 | 0 | 0 | 33.8 | 23.9 | 29 | 24.4 | 48.2 | 0 | 52.7 | extremo | 0 |
| 2023-02-19 | 0 | 0 | 33.8 | 24.5 | 37 | 24.2 | 47.2 | 0 | 51 | extremo | 0 |
| 2023-02-20 | 0 | 0 | 33.5 | 24 | 38 | 23.9 | 46.4 | 0 | 51.3 | extremo | 0 |
| 2023-02-21 | 0 | 0 | 33.1 | 24.1 | 40 | 23.2 | 45 | 0 | 47.4 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2023-02-22 | 0 | 0 | 33.8 | 23.9 | 36 | 25.7 | 48.6 | 0 | 50.6 | extremo | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 3,222ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 2days
- 11 Feb 2023 – 12 Feb 2023
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- municipalities
- Started on
- 11 Feb
- 2023
- Heat detections
- 75
- in a single hotspot: 145 MW
- Danger at start
- 40
- Very high · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 403MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
11 Feb12 Feb
12 Feb 2023
How it evolved, day by day
11 Feb
12 Feb
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
35°high
44km/h · peak gust
40%lowest humidity
It had gone 32 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
44% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 12 ha in 2016, 355 ha in 2018, 1,059 ha in 2020, 236 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 1,404 ha that had burned before.
- 321 ha Pedro Camejo fire, December 2018 4,121 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 236 ha Pedro Camejo fire, December 2021 5,234 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 15 ha Pedro Camejo fire, February 2020 1,623 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 12 ha Pedro Camejo fire, January 2016 2,512 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Pedro Camejo where it started3,241 ha reached on 11 Feb0.2 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2025Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Feb | 34.3 °C | 42 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 12 Feb | 34.6 °C | 40 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 13 Feb after | 33.3 °C | 47 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 14 Feb after | 33.8 °C | 48 % | 38 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 37 |
| 15 Feb after | 33.4 °C | 49 % | 46 km/h | 0.1 mm | Very high 43 |
| 16 Feb after | 32.7 °C | 44 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 17 Feb after | 33.5 °C | 34 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 18 Feb after | 33.8 °C | 29 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 19 Feb after | 33.8 °C | 37 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 20 Feb after | 33.5 °C | 38 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 21 Feb after | 33.1 °C | 40 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 22 Feb after | 33.8 °C | 36 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 40.2, a minimum humidity of 42% and 32 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 19.
FWI at the start
40.2
Minimum humidity
42 %
Days without rain
32
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Pedro Camejo fire, 11 February 2023
3,222 ha
2 days
FWI 40.2
Min. humidity 42 %
Pedro Camejo fire, March 2017
1,515 ha
5 days
FWI 39.1
Min. humidity 40 %
18 km away, in 2017
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 4.1 mm on 11 Mar.
Achaguas fire, February 2017
1,696 ha
2 days
FWI 40.3
Min. humidity 41 %
38 km away, in 2017
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
La Primavera fire, January 2022
2,637 ha
5 days
FWI 39.3
Min. humidity 44 %
101 km away, in 2022
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 2.4 mm on 17 Jan.
Pedro Camejo fire, January 2024
2,246 ha
2 days
FWI 41.3
Min. humidity 42 %
164 km away, in 2024
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.2 mm on 2 Feb.
Puerto Carreño fire, February 2019
2,195 ha
3 days
FWI 40.8
Min. humidity 39 %
61 km away, in 2019
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
What happened to them
- 3 days
- median duration
- 2,085 ha
- median area
- 100 %
- went past 1,000 ha
- 1.8 mm
- rain at the end (median; 8 of 19 had it)
It was 1.5 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 2 days, against 3 days.
Only 2 of its 19 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 11 of 19, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.8 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
—first rain
—no rain in ten days
44km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 12 Feb, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 8 of 19, with a median of 1.8 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 4 Feb 2023
After · 19 Feb 2023
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 14 February 2023 the air beside the fire reached 33 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 16: 1.1 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
PM2.5 peak33 µg/m³
Days over the guideline1 day
PM1047 µg/m³
Optical depth0.42
WHO 15
9 Feb11 Feb13 Feb15 Feb
Good
Fair
Moderate
Poor
Very poor
Extremely poor
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 75Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Pedro Camejo fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 11 February 2023 and 12 February 2023: 2 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,222 hectares (32.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Pedro Camejo (3,241 ha, 0.2 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 34.6 °C, humidity dropped to 40 % and gusts hit 44 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 40, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Venezuela (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 19. Their median duration was 3 days and their median area 2,085 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 2 of its 19 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 11 of 19, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.8 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 911 · Emergency number and official warnings
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 75 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.