Skip to content
worldfires
LA · Laos · →

Pak Xeng fire, March 2023 Pak Xeng, Park Ou, Phonxay

Out · last detection 16 Apr 2023, 19:08 UTC

The fire started on 21 March 2023 in Pak Xeng, Laos, and satellites saw it burning for 26 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 30,865 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.

It is the 4th largest in Luang Prabang since 2016 (of 295 with a page). Number 4 in Laos in 2023, of 239.

Compare with…
Burnt area
30,865ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
26days
21 Mar 2023 – 15 Apr 2023
Municipalities hit
3
districts
Started on
21 Mar
2023
Heat detections
1,512
in a single hotspot: 327 MW
Danger at start
25
High · FWI index
Average daily power
1.1GW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 21 Mar15 Apr
16 Apr 2023

How it evolved, day by day

21 Mar 2023 · 130 MW · 10 22 Mar 2023 · 625 MW · 40 23 Mar 2023 · 651 MW · 36 24 Mar 2023 · 1,657 MW · 59 25 Mar 2023 · 1,050 MW · 70 26 Mar 2023 · 2,654 MW · 140 27 Mar 2023 · 263 MW · 3 28 Mar 2023 · 1,421 MW · 44 29 Mar 2023 · 1,315 MW · 34 30 Mar 2023 · 6 MW · 1 31 Mar 2023 · 644 MW · 24 1 Apr 2023 · 606 MW · 39 2 Apr 2023 · 1,419 MW · 62 3 Apr 2023 · 5,567 MW · 197 4 Apr 2023 · 4,156 MW · 236 5 Apr 2023 · 2,908 MW · 251 6 Apr 2023 · 1,903 MW · 121 7 Apr 2023 · 207 MW · 16 8 Apr 2023 · 452 MW · 24 10 Apr 2023 · 150 MW · 14 11 Apr 2023 · 463 MW · 25 12 Apr 2023 · 1 MW · 1 13 Apr 2023 · 520 MW · 16 14 Apr 2023 · 387 MW · 19 15 Apr 2023 · 543 MW · 21 16 Apr 2023 · 191 MW · 9
21 Mar 25 Mar 29 Mar 2 Apr 3 Apr 6 Apr 11 Apr 15 Apr

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

38°high
44km/h · peak gust
26%lowest humidity

It had gone 4 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.2 mm on 25 Apr.

This area had burned before

75% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 4,377 ha in 2016, 5,439 ha in 2017, 3,700 ha in 2018, 8,178 ha in 2019, 16,132 ha in 2020, 6,368 ha in 2021, 2,202 ha in 2022. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 23,043 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 19% of the area of London (309 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Pak Xeng where it started
    19,996 ha reached on 21 Mar
    12 %
  2. 8,764 ha reached on 22 Mar
    9.9 %
  3. 2,264 ha reached on 22 Mar
    0.9 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area1.8 ha
Residents≈ 1,500

Inside the perimeter there were about 1.8 hectares of built-up land and about 1,500 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
21 Mar 34.2 °C 37 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
22 Mar 35.6 °C 29 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
23 Mar 36.3 °C 27 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
24 Mar 35.8 °C 28 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
25 Mar 36.4 °C 28 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
26 Mar 35.3 °C 29 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
27 Mar 34.8 °C 33 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
28 Mar 33.1 °C 46 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
29 Mar 32.0 °C 50 % 41 km/h 0.8 mm Moderate 15
30 Mar 32.7 °C 48 % 31 km/h 3.2 mm Low 6
31 Mar 33.5 °C 41 % 34 km/h 0.1 mm Moderate 16
1 Apr 35.3 °C 35 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
2 Apr 36.1 °C 31 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
3 Apr 35.9 °C 29 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
4 Apr 36.3 °C 28 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
5 Apr 36.3 °C 26 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
6 Apr 36.8 °C 28 % 21 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
7 Apr 35.9 °C 35 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
8 Apr 32.1 °C 53 % 31 km/h 0.6 mm Moderate 21
9 Apr 34.1 °C 50 % 36 km/h 0.9 mm Moderate 17
10 Apr 36.7 °C 35 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
11 Apr 38.1 °C 33 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
12 Apr 37.6 °C 33 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
13 Apr 37.4 °C 37 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
14 Apr 38.4 °C 36 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
15 Apr 38.2 °C 32 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
16 Apr after 35.9 °C 44 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
17 Apr after 36.6 °C 41 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
18 Apr after 39.7 °C 29 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
19 Apr after 39.9 °C 25 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
20 Apr after 39.1 °C 29 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
21 Apr after 38.6 °C 31 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
22 Apr after 37.2 °C 37 % 35 km/h 0.8 mm High 29
23 Apr after 39.2 °C 25 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
24 Apr after 36.7 °C 35 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
25 Apr after 37.4 °C 36 % 26 km/h 1.2 mm High 24

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 14 Mar 2023
After · 22 Apr 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 6 April 2023 the air beside the fire reached 542 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 281: 19 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak542 µg/m³
Days over the guideline31 days
PM10775 µg/m³
Optical depth3.67
19202122232425262728293031123456789101112131415161718
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 1,512Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Laos ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Pak Xeng fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 21 March 2023 to 15 April 2023 (26 days). The perimeter dates it from 21 March 2023 to 8 April 2023.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 30,865 hectares (308.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 3 municipalities: Pak Xeng (19,996 ha, 12 %); Park Ou (8,764 ha, 9.9 %); Phonxay (2,264 ha, 0.9 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 38.4 °C, humidity dropped to 26 % and gusts hit 44 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 33, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Laos (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

No changes since 24 October 2026.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 6 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 21 March 2023 to 8 April 2023. 1,512 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.