Skip to content
worldfires
LA · Laos · –

Viengkham fire, 10 April 2019 Pak Xeng, Viengkham

Out · last detection 21 Apr 2019, 06:36 UTC

The fire started on 10 April 2019 in Viengkham, Laos, and satellites saw it burning for 12 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 8,338 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 15th largest in Luang Prabang since 2016 (of 257 with a page). Number 7 in Laos in 2019, of 126.

Burnt area
8,338ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
12days
10 Apr 2019 – 21 Apr 2019
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
10 Apr
2019
Heat detections
372
in a single hotspot: 369 MW
Danger at start
18
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
1.6GW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 10 Apr21 Apr
21 Apr 2019

How it evolved, day by day

10 Apr 2019 · 90 MW · 9 11 Apr 2019 · 3,302 MW · 69 12 Apr 2019 · 5,376 MW · 51 13 Apr 2019 · 2,037 MW · 82 14 Apr 2019 · 5,174 MW · 67 15 Apr 2019 · 1,013 MW · 41 16 Apr 2019 · 37 MW · 7 17 Apr 2019 · 1,146 MW · 13 18 Apr 2019 · 268 MW · 8 19 Apr 2019 · 46 MW · 5 20 Apr 2019 · 325 MW · 12 21 Apr 2019 · 66 MW · 8
12 Apr 16 Apr 19 Apr

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

36°high
46km/h · peak gust
24%lowest humidity

It had gone 3 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.3 mm on 27 Apr.

This area had burned before

41% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 324 ha in 2016, 865 ha in 2017, 2,265 ha in 2018.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 5.3% of the area of London (83 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. 5,715 ha reached on 10 Apr
    3.4 %
  2. Viengkham where it started
    2,661 ha reached on 10 Apr
    1.3 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area4.6 ha
Residents≈ 1,900

Inside the perimeter there were about 4.6 hectares of built-up land and about 1,900 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
10 Apr 32.5 °C 37 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 18
11 Apr 33.0 °C 32 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
12 Apr 33.4 °C 35 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
13 Apr 34.1 °C 32 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
14 Apr 33.7 °C 38 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
15 Apr 34.6 °C 37 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
16 Apr 35.5 °C 33 % 37 km/h 0.2 mm High 23
17 Apr 34.4 °C 38 % 43 km/h 1.7 mm Moderate 15
18 Apr 35.6 °C 29 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
19 Apr 36.5 °C 26 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
20 Apr 36.5 °C 24 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
21 Apr 35.8 °C 33 % 39 km/h 0.9 mm High 24
22 Apr after 34.4 °C 35 % 36 km/h 0.9 mm High 21
23 Apr after 34.6 °C 36 % 35 km/h 0.4 mm High 22
24 Apr after 34.2 °C 39 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
25 Apr after 34.7 °C 36 % 31 km/h 0.6 mm High 23
26 Apr after 35.5 °C 31 % 30 km/h 0.3 mm High 28
27 Apr after 32.4 °C 37 % 42 km/h 1.3 mm Moderate 17

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 17.9, a minimum humidity of 37% and 3 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 41.

FWI at the start 17.9
Minimum humidity 37 %
Days without rain 3
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Phonxay fire, March 2023
3,282 ha 15 days FWI 17.3 Min. humidity 37 % 48 km away, in 2023

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 2.6 mm on 30 Mar.

What happened to them

9 days
median duration
2,837 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
3.4 mm
rain at the end (median; 38 of 41 had it)

It was 2.9 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 12 days, against 9 days.

Only 3 of its 41 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 3 of 41, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.4 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

1.3 mmfirst rain
27 Apr6 days after it ended
46km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 21 Apr, and on 27 Apr 1.3 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 38 of 41, with a median of 3.4 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 3 Apr 2019
After · 28 Apr 2019

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 372Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Laos

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Viengkham fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 10 April 2019 to 21 April 2019 (12 days). The perimeter dates it from 10 April 2019 to 18 April 2019.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 8,338 hectares (83.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Pak Xeng (5,715 ha, 3.4 %); Viengkham (2,661 ha, 1.3 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 36.5 °C, humidity dropped to 24 % and gusts hit 46 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 31, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Laos (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 41. Their median duration was 9 days and their median area 2,837 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 3 of its 41 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 3 of 41, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.4 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 10 April 2019 to 18 April 2019. 372 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.