Skip to content
worldfires
LA · Laos · →

Pak Xeng fire, 10 April 2019 Pak Xeng, Viengkham

Out · last detection 21 Apr 2019, 06:36 UTC

The fire started on 10 April 2019 in Pak Xeng, Laos, and satellites saw it burning for 12 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,405 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 101th largest in Luang Prabang since 2016 (of 295 with a page). Number 43 in Laos in 2019, of 126.

Compare with…

Suggestions: Pak Xeng · 2023Pak Xeng · 2026

Burnt area
3,405ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
12days
10 Apr 2019 – 21 Apr 2019
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
10 Apr
2019
Heat detections
131
in a single hotspot: 353 MW
Danger at start
21
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
697MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 10 Apr21 Apr
21 Apr 2019

How it evolved, day by day

11 Apr 2019 · 37 MW · 4 12 Apr 2019 · 618 MW · 4 13 Apr 2019 · 331 MW · 9 14 Apr 2019 · 1,164 MW · 27 15 Apr 2019 · 76 MW · 6 16 Apr 2019 · 2,799 MW · 40 17 Apr 2019 · 1,577 MW · 7 18 Apr 2019 · 901 MW · 21 19 Apr 2019 · 6 MW · 3 20 Apr 2019 · 137 MW · 8 21 Apr 2019 · 15 MW · 2
11 Apr 13 Apr 15 Apr 16 Apr 17 Apr 19 Apr 21 Apr

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

37°high
48km/h · peak gust
24%lowest humidity

It had gone 4 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.2 mm on 26 Apr.

This area had burned before

15% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 509 ha in 2016.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2.2% of the area of London (34 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Pak Xeng where it started
    1,711 ha reached on 11 Apr
    1.0 %
  2. 1,709 ha reached on 12 Apr
    0.8 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area1.3 ha
Residents≈ 1,200

Inside the perimeter there were about 1.3 hectares of built-up land and about 1,200 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
11 Apr 32.8 °C 33 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
12 Apr 33.2 °C 36 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
13 Apr 33.9 °C 33 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
14 Apr 33.3 °C 38 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
15 Apr 34.6 °C 39 % 41 km/h 0.1 mm High 24
16 Apr 35.5 °C 34 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
17 Apr 34.9 °C 37 % 44 km/h 0.7 mm High 24
18 Apr 35.6 °C 28 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
19 Apr 36.6 °C 25 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
20 Apr 36.3 °C 24 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
21 Apr 35.5 °C 34 % 35 km/h 1.3 mm High 23
22 Apr after 34.2 °C 36 % 36 km/h 0.4 mm High 24
23 Apr after 34.2 °C 36 % 36 km/h 0.2 mm High 24
24 Apr after 33.9 °C 40 % 38 km/h 0.1 mm High 26
25 Apr after 34.2 °C 35 % 32 km/h 0.1 mm High 25
26 Apr after 34.9 °C 32 % 30 km/h 1.2 mm High 22

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 3 Apr 2019
After · 28 Apr 2019

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 131Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Laos ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Pak Xeng fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 10 April 2019 to 21 April 2019 (12 days). The perimeter dates it from 12 April 2019 to 20 April 2019.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,405 hectares (34.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Pak Xeng (1,711 ha, 1.0 %); Viengkham (1,709 ha, 0.8 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 36.6 °C, humidity dropped to 24 % and gusts hit 48 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 34, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Laos (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Start date: 11 April 2019 → 10 April 2019.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 12 April 2019 to 20 April 2019. 131 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.