Skip to content
worldfires
TH · Thailand · →

Pai fire, 28 March 2019 Pai, Chiang Dao

Out · last detection 3 Apr 2019, 19:43 UTC

The fire started on 28 March 2019 in Pai, Thailand, and satellites saw it burning for 7 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,629 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 344th largest in Mae Hong Son Province since 2016 (of 668 with a page). Number 216 in Thailand in 2019, of 503.

Burnt area
1,629ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
7days
28 Mar 2019 – 3 Apr 2019
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
28 Mar
2019
Heat detections
44
in a single hotspot: 67 MW
Danger at start
40
Very high · FWI index
Energy released
171MW
sum of detected power

Where it burned

3 Apr 2019
HOTSPOTS BY DAY 28 Mar3 Apr

How it evolved, day by day

28293031123

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

36°high
54km/h · peak gust
14%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

15% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 185 ha in 2016, 55 ha in 2018.

What happened to each town

  1. Pai where it started
    1,601 ha reached on 24 Mar
    0.7 %
  2. 37 ha
    0.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
17 Mar 34.8 °C 18 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
18 Mar 35.0 °C 18 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
19 Mar 33.1 °C 24 % 54 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
20 Mar 33.3 °C 23 % 50 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
21 Mar 33.9 °C 21 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
22 Mar 34.0 °C 21 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
23 Mar 34.9 °C 20 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
24 Mar 35.4 °C 19 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
25 Mar 35.9 °C 21 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
26 Mar 35.5 °C 20 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
27 Mar 34.0 °C 27 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
28 Mar 33.2 °C 24 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
29 Mar 35.4 °C 14 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
30 Mar 34.7 °C 22 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
31 Mar 35.1 °C 21 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
1 Apr 35.6 °C 18 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
2 Apr 35.7 °C 18 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
3 Apr 34.6 °C 25 % 37 km/h 0.2 mm Very high 41
4 Apr after 35.6 °C 20 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
5 Apr after 35.3 °C 21 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
6 Apr after 35.8 °C 21 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
7 Apr after 35.9 °C 22 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
8 Apr after 35.4 °C 22 % 46 km/h 0.2 mm Very high 45
9 Apr after 35.8 °C 22 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
10 Apr after 36.0 °C 19 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
11 Apr after 36.8 °C 20 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
12 Apr after 36.4 °C 21 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
13 Apr after 36.6 °C 23 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 21 Mar 2019
After · 10 Apr 2019

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 44Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Thailand ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Pai fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 28 March 2019 and 3 April 2019: 7 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,629 hectares (16.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Pai (1,601 ha, 0.7 %); Chiang Dao (37 ha, 0.0 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 35.9 °C, humidity dropped to 14 % and gusts hit 54 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 45, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Thailand (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 199 · 191

Satellite cross-check

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 199 · 191.

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.